-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Trace events can be defined from a template using DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS/DEFINE_EVENT or directly with TRACE_EVENT. In both cases we have a template tracepoint handler, used to record the trace, to which we pass our ftrace event instance. In the function level, if the class is named "foo" and the event is named "blah", we have the following chain of calls: perf_trace_blah() -> perf_trace_templ_foo() In the case we have several events sharing the class "blah", we'll have multiple users of perf_trace_templ_foo(), and it won't be inlined by the compiler. This is usually what happens with the DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS/DEFINE_EVENT based definition. But if perf_trace_blah() is the only caller of perf_trace_templ_foo() there are fair chances that it will be inlined. The problem is that we fetch the regs from perf_trace_templ_foo() after we rewinded the frame pointer to the second caller, we want to reach the caller of perf_trace_blah() to get the right source of the event. And we do this by always assuming that perf_trace_templ_foo() is not inlined. But as shown above this is not always true. And if it is inlined we miss the first caller, losing the most important level of precision. We get: 61.31% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] do_softirq | --- do_softirq irq_exit do_IRQ common_interrupt | |--25.00%-- tty_buffer_request_room Instead of: 61.31% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __do_softirq | --- __do_softirq do_softirq irq_exit do_IRQ common_interrupt | |--25.00%-- tty_buffer_request_room To fix this, we fetch the regs from perf_trace_blah() rather than perf_trace_templ_foo() so that we don't have to deal with inlining surprises. That also bring us the advantage of having the true source of the event even if we don't have frame pointers. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
6cc8a7c1