-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Extract the "use_eager_fpu()" code from drop_init_fpu() into a new, simple helper restore_init_xstate(). The next patch adds another user. - It is not clear why we do not check use_fxsr() like fpu_restore_checking() does. eager_fpu_init_bp() calls setup_init_fpu_buf() too, and we have the "eagerfpu=on" kernel option. - Ignoring the fact that init_xstate_buf is "struct xsave_struct *", not "union thread_xstate *", it is not clear why we can not simply use fpu_restore_checking() and avoid the code duplication. - It is not clear why we can't call setup_init_fpu_buf() unconditionally to always create init_xstate_buf(). Then do_device_not_available() path (at least) could use restore_init_xstate() too. It doesn't need to init fpu->state, its content doesn't matter until unlazy_fpu()/__switch_to()/etc which overwrites this memory anyway. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150311173429.GD5032@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
8f4d8186