-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
Calling cancel_delayed_work() from inside spin_lock_irqsave, introduces a potential deadlock. As explained by Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> A - lock T - timer phase CPU 1 CPU 2 --------------------------------------------- some place that calls cancel_timer_sync() (which is the | code) lock-irq(A) | "lock-irq"(T) | "unlock"(T) | wait(T) unlock(A) timer softirq "lock"(T) run(T) "unlock"(T) irq handler lock(A) unlock(A) Now all that again, interleaved, leading to deadlock: lock-irq(A) "lock"(T) run(T) IRQ during or maybe before run(T) --> lock(A) "lock-irq"(T) wait(T) We fix this by moving the call to cancel_delayed_work() into workqueue. There are cases where the work may not actually be queued or running at the time we are trying to cancel it, but cancel_delayed_work() is able to deal with this. Also cleanup iwl_set_mode related to this call. This function (iwl_set_mode) is only called when bringing interface up and there will thus not be any scanning done. No need to try to cancel scanning. Fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13224, which was also reported at http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=124081921903223&w=2 . Tested-by: NMiles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Acked-by: NZhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
fbc9f97b