When cpu/task clock events are initialized, their sampling
frequencies are converted to have a fixed value.  However it
missed to update the hwc->last_period which was set to 1 for
initial sampling frequency calibration.

Because this hwc->last_period value is used as a period in
perf_swevent_ hrtime(), every recorded sample will have an
incorrected period of 1.

  $ perf record -e task-clock noploop 1
  [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.158 MB perf.data (~6919 samples) ]

  $ perf report -n --show-total-period  --stdio
  # Samples: 4K of event 'task-clock'
  # Event count (approx.): 4000
  #
  # Overhead       Samples        Period  Command  Shared Object              Symbol
  # ........  ............  ............  .......  .............  ..................
  #
      99.95%          3998          3998  noploop  noploop        [.] main
       0.03%             1             1  noploop  libc-2.15.so   [.] init_cacheinfo
       0.03%             1             1  noploop  ld-2.15.so     [.] open_verify

Note that it doesn't affect the non-sampling event so that the
perf stat still gets correct value with or without this patch.

  $ perf stat -e task-clock noploop 1

   Performance counter stats for 'noploop 1':

         1000.272525 task-clock                #    1.000 CPUs utilized

         1.000560605 seconds time elapsed
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1363574507-18808-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>