-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
If updating journal superblock fails after journal data has been flushed, the error is omitted and this will mislead the caller as a normal case. In ocfs2, the checkpoint will be treated successfully and the other node can get the lock to update. Since the sb_start is still pointing to the old log block, it will rewrite the journal data during journal recovery by the other node. Thus the new updates will be overwritten and ocfs2 corrupts. So in above case we have to return the error, and ocfs2_commit_cache will take care of the error and prevent the other node to do update first. And only after recovering journal it can do the new updates. The issue discussion mail can be found at: https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2015-June/010856.html http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/48841 [ Fixed bug in patch which allowed a non-negative error return from jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() to leak out of jbd2_fjournal_flush(); this was causing xfstests ext4/306 to fail. -- Ted ] Reported-by: NYiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Tested-by: NYiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
6f6a6fda