time_after (as opposed to time_after_equal) already ensures that the
cache lifetime is at least as much as requested. There is no point in
manually adding another jiffy to that value, and this can confuse the
reader into wrong interpretation.
Signed-off-by: NJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>