destroy_workqueue() performs several sanity checks before proceeding
with destruction of a workqueue.  One of the checks verifies that
refcnt of each pwq (pool_workqueue) is over 1 as at that point there
should be no in-flight work items and the only holder of pwq refs is
the workqueue itself.

This worked fine as a workqueue used to hold only one reference to its
pwqs; however, since 4c16bd32 ("workqueue: implement NUMA affinity
for unbound workqueues"), a workqueue may hold multiple references to
its default pwq triggering this sanity check spuriously.

Fix it by not triggering the pwq->refcnt assertion on default pwqs.

An example spurious WARN trigger follows.

 WARNING: at kernel/workqueue.c:4201 destroy_workqueue+0x6a/0x13e()
 Hardware name: 4286C12
 Modules linked in: sdhci_pci sdhci mmc_core usb_storage i915 drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core video
 Pid: 361, comm: umount Not tainted 3.9.0-rc5+ #29
 Call Trace:
  [<c04314a7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0x93
  [<c04314e0>] warn_slowpath_null+0x22/0x24
  [<c044796a>] destroy_workqueue+0x6a/0x13e
  [<c056dc01>] ext4_put_super+0x43/0x2c4
  [<c04fb7b8>] generic_shutdown_super+0x4b/0xb9
  [<c04fb848>] kill_block_super+0x22/0x60
  [<c04fb960>] deactivate_locked_super+0x2f/0x56
  [<c04fc41b>] deactivate_super+0x2e/0x31
  [<c050f1e6>] mntput_no_expire+0x103/0x108
  [<c050fdce>] sys_umount+0x2a2/0x2c4
  [<c050fe0e>] sys_oldumount+0x1e/0x20
  [<c085ba4d>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38

tj: Rewrote description.
Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>