• J
    cifs: try to handle the MUST SecurityFlags sanely · 52dfb446
    Jeff Layton 提交于
    The cifs.ko SecurityFlags interface wins my award for worst-designed
    interface ever, but we're sort of stuck with it since it's documented
    and people do use it (even if it doesn't work correctly).
    
    Case in point -- you can specify multiple sets of "MUST" flags. It makes
    absolutely no sense, but you can do it.
    
    What should the effect be in such a case? No one knows or seems to have
    considered this so far, so let's define it now. If you try to specify
    multiple MUST flags, clear any other MAY or MUST bits except for the
    ones that involve signing.
    Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
    Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
    Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
    52dfb446
cifs_debug.c 18.6 KB