-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
After changing INIT_UDATA_BUF_OR_NULL() to an inline function, this does the same change to INIT_UDATA for consistency. I'm keeping it separate as this part is much larger and we wouldn't want to backport this to stable kernels if we ever want to address the gcc warnings by backporting the first patch. Again, using an inline function gives us better type safety here among other issues with macros. I'm using u64_to_user_ptr() to convert the user pointer to simplify the logic rather than adding lots of new type casts. Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
40a20339