-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The shared fence array is not autopruning and may continue to grow as an object is shared between new timelines. Take the opportunity when we think the object is idle (we have to confirm that any external fence is also signaled) to decouple all the fences. We apply a similar trick after waiting on an object, see commit e54ca977 ("drm/i915: Remove completed fences after a wait") v2: No longer need to handle the batch pool as a special case. v3: Need to trylock from within i915_vma_retire as this may be called form the shrinker - and we may later try to allocate underneath the reservation lock, so a deadlock is possible. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102936 Fixes: d07f0e59 ("drm/i915: Move GEM activity tracking into a common struct reservation_object") Fixes: 80b204bc ("drm/i915: Enable multiple timelines") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171107220656.5020-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 1ab22356) Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
398c13b9