should_continue_reclaim() for reclaim/compaction allows scanning to
continue even if pages are not being reclaimed until the full list is
scanned.  In terms of allocation success, this makes sense but potentially
it introduces unwanted latency for high-order allocations such as
transparent hugepages and network jumbo frames that would prefer to fail
the allocation attempt and fallback to order-0 pages.  Worse, there is a
potential that the full LRU scan will clear all the young bits, distort
page aging information and potentially push pages into swap that would
have otherwise remained resident.

This patch will stop reclaim/compaction if no pages were reclaimed in the
last SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages that were considered.  For allocations such as
hugetlbfs that use __GFP_REPEAT and have fewer fallback options, the full
LRU list may still be scanned.

Order-0 allocation should not be affected because RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION
is not set so the following avoids the gfp_mask being examined:

        if (!(sc->reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION))
                return false;

A tool was developed based on ftrace that tracked the latency of
high-order allocations while transparent hugepage support was enabled and
three benchmarks were run.  The "fix-infinite" figures are 2.6.38-rc4 with
Johannes's patch "vmscan: fix zone shrinking exit when scan work is done"
applied.

  STREAM Highorder Allocation Latency Statistics
                 fix-infinite     break-early
  1 :: Count            10298           10229
  1 :: Min             0.4560          0.4640
  1 :: Mean            1.0589          1.0183
  1 :: Max            14.5990         11.7510
  1 :: Stddev          0.5208          0.4719
  2 :: Count                2               1
  2 :: Min             1.8610          3.7240
  2 :: Mean            3.4325          3.7240
  2 :: Max             5.0040          3.7240
  2 :: Stddev          1.5715          0.0000
  9 :: Count           111696          111694
  9 :: Min             0.5230          0.4110
  9 :: Mean           10.5831         10.5718
  9 :: Max            38.4480         43.2900
  9 :: Stddev          1.1147          1.1325

Mean time for order-1 allocations is reduced.  order-2 looks increased but
with so few allocations, it's not particularly significant.  THP mean
allocation latency is also reduced.  That said, allocation time varies so
significantly that the reductions are within noise.

Max allocation time is reduced by a significant amount for low-order
allocations but reduced for THP allocations which presumably are now
breaking before reclaim has done enough work.

  SysBench Highorder Allocation Latency Statistics
                 fix-infinite     break-early
  1 :: Count            15745           15677
  1 :: Min             0.4250          0.4550
  1 :: Mean            1.1023          1.0810
  1 :: Max            14.4590         10.8220
  1 :: Stddev          0.5117          0.5100
  2 :: Count                1               1
  2 :: Min             3.0040          2.1530
  2 :: Mean            3.0040          2.1530
  2 :: Max             3.0040          2.1530
  2 :: Stddev          0.0000          0.0000
  9 :: Count             2017            1931
  9 :: Min             0.4980          0.7480
  9 :: Mean           10.4717         10.3840
  9 :: Max            24.9460         26.2500
  9 :: Stddev          1.1726          1.1966

Again, mean time for order-1 allocations is reduced while order-2
allocations are too few to draw conclusions from.  The mean time for THP
allocations is also slightly reduced albeit the reductions are within
varianes.

Once again, our maximum allocation time is significantly reduced for
low-order allocations and slightly increased for THP allocations.

  Anon stream mmap reference Highorder Allocation Latency Statistics
  1 :: Count             1376            1790
  1 :: Min             0.4940          0.5010
  1 :: Mean            1.0289          0.9732
  1 :: Max             6.2670          4.2540
  1 :: Stddev          0.4142          0.2785
  2 :: Count                1               -
  2 :: Min             1.9060               -
  2 :: Mean            1.9060               -
  2 :: Max             1.9060               -
  2 :: Stddev          0.0000               -
  9 :: Count            11266           11257
  9 :: Min             0.4990          0.4940
  9 :: Mean        27250.4669      24256.1919
  9 :: Max      11439211.0000    6008885.0000
  9 :: Stddev     226427.4624     186298.1430

This benchmark creates one thread per CPU which references an amount of
anonymous memory 1.5 times the size of physical RAM.  This pounds swap
quite heavily and is intended to exercise THP a bit.

Mean allocation time for order-1 is reduced as before.  It's also reduced
for THP allocations but the variations here are pretty massive due to
swap.  As before, maximum allocation times are significantly reduced.

Overall, the patch reduces the mean and maximum allocation latencies for
the smaller high-order allocations.  This was with Slab configured so it
would be expected to be more significant with Slub which uses these size
allocations more aggressively.

The mean allocation times for THP allocations are also slightly reduced.
The maximum latency was slightly increased as predicted by the comments
due to reclaim/compaction breaking early.  However, workloads care more
about the latency of lower-order allocations than THP so it's an
acceptable trade-off.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Acked-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>