-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
The ironlake_irq_handler and ivybridge_irq_handler functions do basically the same thing, but they have different implementation styles. With this patch we reorganize ironlake_irq_handler in a way that makes it look very similar to ivybridge_irq_handler. One of the advantages of this new function style is that we don't write 0 to the IIR registers anymore. v2: - Rebase due to changes on previous patches - Move pm_iir to a tighter scope (Chris) Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
27b9188e