• T
    ext4: refactor punch hole code · 26a4c0c6
    Theodore Ts'o 提交于
    Move common code in ext4_ind_punch_hole() and ext4_ext_punch_hole()
    into ext4_punch_hole().  This saves over 150 lines of code.
    
    This also fixes a potential bug when the punch_hole() code is racing
    against indirect-to-extents or extents-to-indirect migation.  We are
    currently using i_mutex to protect against changes to the inode flag;
    specifically, the append-only, immutable, and extents inode flags.  So
    we need to take i_mutex before deciding whether to use the
    extents-specific or indirect-specific punch_hole code.
    
    Also, there was a missing call to ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio() in
    the indirect punch codepath.  This was added in commit 02d262df
    to block DIO readers racing against the punch operation in the
    codepath for extent-mapped inodes, but it was missing for
    indirect-block mapped inodes.  One of the advantages of refactoring
    the code is that it makes such oversights much less likely.
    Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
    26a4c0c6
extents.c 127.5 KB