-
由 Ramachandra K 提交于
There has been a change in the format of port identifiers between revision 10 of the SRP specification and the current revision 16A. Revision 10 specifies port identifier format as lower 8 bytes : GUID upper 8 bytes : Extension Whereas revision 16A specifies it as lower 8 bytes : Extension upper 8 bytes : GUID There are older targets (e.g. SilverStorm Virtual Fibre Channel Bridge) which conform to revision 10 of the SRP specification. The I/O class of revision 10 is 0xFF00 and the I/O class of revision 16A is 0x0100. For supporting older targets, this patch: 1) Adds a new optional target creation parameter "io_class". Default value of io_class is 0x0100 (i.e. revision 16A) 2) Uses the correct port identifier format for targets with IO class of 0xFF00 (i.e. conforming to revision 10) Signed-off-by: NRamachandra K <rkuchimanchi@silverstorm.com> Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
0c0450db