-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Instead of having a giant if cascade to figure this out according to the passed-in register. We could do quite a bit more cleaning up and all by using the port at more places, but I think this should be part of a bigger rework to introduce a struct intel_digital_port which would keep track of all these things. I guess this will be part of some haswell-DP-induced refactoring. For now this rips out the big cascade, which is what annoyed me so much. v2: Add port variable name back for the func decl (I've tried to trick myself below the 80 char limit). Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-Off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
08d644ad