未验证 提交 95a1db61 编写于 作者: B Bernard Xiong 提交者: GitHub

Update PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

上级 207a43e3
### Summary of this Pull Request (PR) 拉取/合并请求的简述
## 拉取/合并请求描述:(PR description)
**Add description here.** **请在这里加入描述**
请仔细阅读以下文字。请在这里填写您的PR描述,可以包括以下之一的内容:为什么提交这份PR;解决的问题是什么,你的解决方案是什么;
Please read the following carefully. Please fill in your PR description here, which can include one of the following items: why to submit this PR; what is the problem solved and what is your solution;
### Intent for your PR 拉取/合并请求的目的
并确认已经在什么情况或板卡上进行了测试。
And confirm in which case or board have been tested.
Choose one (Mandatory): 必须选择一项
以下的内容请在提交PR后,一项项进行check,没问题后逐条在页面上打钩。
The following contents should be checked item by item after submitted PR, and ticked on the browser one by one after no problem.
- [ ] This PR is for a code-review and is intended to get feedback 本拉取/合并请求是一个草稿版本
- [ ] This PR is mature, and ready to be integrated into the repo 本拉取/合并请求是一个成熟版本
### 当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR
### Reviewers (Mandatory): 代码审阅者(必须指定)
必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):
(@<github.com username(s)> Ex: @user1, @user2)
- [ ] 本拉取/合并请求是一个草稿版本 This PR is for a code-review and is intended to get feedback
- [ ] 本拉取/合并请求是一个成熟版本 This PR is mature, and ready to be integrated into the repo
### Code Quality: 代码质量
### 代码质量 Code Quality:
As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:
我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了:
我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:
- [ ] Already check the difference between PR and old code 已经仔细查看过代码改动的对比
- [ ] Style guide is adhered to, including spacing, naming and other style 代码风格正确,包括缩进空格,命名及其他风格
- [ ] All redundant code is removed and cleaned up 没有垃圾代码,代码尽量精简,不包含`#if 0`代码,不包含已经被注释了的代码
- [ ] All modifications are justified and not affect other components or BSP 所有变更均有原因及合理的,并且不会影响到其他软件组件代码或BSP
- [ ] I've commented appropriately where code is tricky 对难懂代码均提供对应的注释
- [ ] Code in this PR is of high quality 本拉取/合并请求代码是高质量的
### Testing:代码测试
I've tested the code using the following test programs (provide list here):
我已经在如下场合跑过对应的测试:
- [ ] application 1
- [ ] application 2
- [ ] ...(add others here)
- [ ] 已经仔细查看过代码改动的对比 Already check the difference between PR and old code
- [ ] 代码风格正确,包括缩进空格,命名及其他风格 Style guide is adhered to, including spacing, naming and other style
- [ ] 没有垃圾代码,代码尽量精简,不包含`#if 0`代码,不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up
- [ ] 所有变更均有原因及合理的,并且不会影响到其他软件组件代码或BSP All modifications are justified and not affect other components or BSP
- [ ] 对难懂代码均提供对应的注释 I've commented appropriately where code is tricky
- [ ] 本拉取/合并请求代码是高质量的 Code in this PR is of high quality
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册