- 23 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
The dependency projects were added as a way to help unify our project.json references. Instead of every project referencing the NuGet package, we had a dependency project which referenced it and everyone referenced that dependency project. Due to the transitive nature of NuGet it would be roughly equivalent. This system had a number of downsides: 1. There was no enforcement. Even though dependency projects existed, there was no mechanism to force developers to use them. 2. Getting the granularity correct was tricky. 3. The projects themselves have special props / targets to get them to produce no output. This can trip up MSBuild up to date checks. Since then though we've begun using RepoUtil to verify our NuGet reference correctness. This removed the need for these projects and hence I'm removing them from our build.
-
- 11 11月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Julien Couvreur 提交于
-
由 Charles Stoner 提交于
-
由 Matt Warren 提交于
-
- 05 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
-
- 04 11月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
-
- 02 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
The NuSpec file for the compiler is missing a number of facades. This flaw's been around for some time in a few forms but it's gone un-noticed due to our reflection magic around facades. Now that the magic is gone we're finding places where the NuSpec is incorrect. This change both fixes the NuSpec and adds verification that it is correct. The strategy for correctness is to build a deployment project which contains all of the deliverables in the NuSpec. Namely: - csc.exe - vbc.exe - csi.exe - Microsoft.Build.Tasks.CodeAnalysis.dll The MSBuild process will deploy all facades necessary for execution to the output directory. That makes it possible to do a simple check that the output and NuSpec are consistent with each other.
-
- 25 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Warren 提交于
-
- 24 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
-
- 22 10月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
TLDR: artifacts are going to move around in Binaries\Debug and the directory is going to get a lot bigger. At a high level build projects can be classified into three categories based on how they write output: - incorrect: a given output path is written to more than once with different contents - less correct: a given output path is written to more than once but always with the same content - correct: a given output path is written to exactly once Today the roslyn build is decidedly “incorrect” as pretty much every file is written directly into Binaries\Debug. This means it ends up writing pretty much every Visual Studio SDK DLL twice: once for Dev14 and once for Dev15. For example at various points in the build Binaries\Debug\Microsoft.VisualStudio.Text.Data.dll may refer to Dev14 and at others it’s Dev15. If this seems like a scary proposition for a build that’s because it is indeed scary and it has real consequences. By now pretty much everyone on the team has hit the build race condition that is dragging down our PRs. The general fix here is to move build outputs into separate directories. Instead of building to $(Configuration) projects now build into say $(Configuration)\Exes\$(MSBuildProjectFileName). This will have a substantial increase in the size of Binaries. We will be looking into ways to reduce that. In the short term though build stability far outweighs the size increase. This change takes us most of the way to "correct". There are several places I had to compromise in order to get this initial change in: - UnitTests still build to a common output folder (one for Dev14, another for Dev15). Pulling unit tests apart is going to take a bit of work. - Every project has a <RoslynProjectType> entry. This will go away in the future for most projects. It's temporarily needed so I can fix roslyn-internal in parallel without taking down the build. - VSL.Imports.targets is messy. Unavoidable for now due to the above. It will get cleaner as I iterate on this. None of these are relevant to the underlying race condition. Hence it's okay to push them off.
-
由 Matt Warren 提交于
-
- 11 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tomas Matousek 提交于
-
- 08 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tomáš Matoušek 提交于
-
- 29 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Gocke 提交于
-
- 27 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heejae Chang 提交于
-
- 24 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Heejae Chang 提交于
-
由 Heejae Chang 提交于
-
- 13 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heejae Chang 提交于
-
- 08 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heejae Chang 提交于
this is to make develop - debug cycle easiler when adding new features to service hub. to enable this, turn on Roslyn/FeatureManager/Features/RemoteHost and RemoteHostInProc once enabled, InProcRemoteHostClient will be used instead of ServiceHubRemoteHostClient except concrete type of RemoteHostClient, all other parts, exactly same code will be used. InProcRemoteHostClient can be used in unit test to test client and server side as they are.
-
- 03 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tomáš Matoušek 提交于
-
- 25 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Gocke 提交于
-
- 17 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marco Goertz 提交于
-
- 16 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
The tool now lives under dotnet/roslyn-tools.
-
- 05 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heejae Chang 提交于
This reverts commit 720f5c5e, reversing changes made to 6a6043c3.
-
- 02 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
The dependency projects serve a few purposes: - Help ensure package unity by serving as a single place for a NuGet reference. - Make NuGet updates simple by having a single place to change. - Grouping together related packages to make it easy to take a dependency on say Visual Studio editor. The first two points are largely obsolete now that our project.json references are strictly validated on every build and have a single update mechanism. This meant a lot of our depnedency projects were just making Roslyn.sln bigger. As such I went through and deleted all of them which had only 1 or 2 project.json entries. I left the VS ones which tend to group 10+ references together. They are still serving a valid "reference VS" purpose.
-
- 30 7月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Heejae Chang 提交于
changes include make SourceText::GetChecksum and AnalyzerTelemetry contructor public. added MustRunInProc in IBuiltInAnalyzer and some clean up around serializing Solution/Project/DocumentId and how DocumentState is exposed. simplified temporary storage service's temporary storage management and added ability to attach to existing temporary storage solution checksum and serialization service. added remote host client - this gives an ability for host (vs) to talk to remote host (service hub) rename and moving files between feature/workspace layers - only real change is having ICompilerDiagnosticAnalyzer interface which can either have inproc implementation or out of proc implementation. - inproc is needed since diagnostics are in feature layer and one who uses feature layer out side of VS host need an implementation. added RemoteWorkspace - RemoteWorkspace has host agnostic implementation of roslyn features/services/workspace that will run in remote host added service hub component and setup project for service hub - service hub component is basically thin layer that deals with converting data to pass in to RemoteWorkspace made devdiv insertion tool to ignore servicehub related files support byte and char array natively in ObjectReader/Writer
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
-
由 Jared Parsons 提交于
-
- 27 7月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Heejae Chang 提交于
service hub component is basically thin layer that deals with converting data to pass in to RemoteWorkspace
-
由 Kevin Halverson 提交于
This reverts commit f88047f5, reversing changes made to b9438f7c.
-
- 23 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 CyrusNajmabadi 提交于
-
- 21 7月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Tomas Matousek 提交于
-
由 CyrusNajmabadi 提交于
-
由 Kevin Pilch-Bisson 提交于
Now that the telemetry API is consumable from OSS and the code is there, no need to have a dedicated binary + vsix for it.
-
- 14 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kevin Halverson 提交于
We need to consume the VSSDK nugets for these assemblies in order to build/run on a machine without VS 2015.
-