1. 16 10月, 2016 6 次提交
  2. 14 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 13 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 21 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 24 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 08 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • B
      Fix a null reference in BaseFormattingRule... · 9ea3dde4
      Balaji Krishnan 提交于
      ... that was introduced with PR #4644
      
      Method `SomeParentHasMissingCloseBrace` expects a fully formed node that
      has a compilation unit, which a roslyn document would have, but this
      code is also in a formatter public api path, that can possibly `an
      arbitrary` syntax node that may not be associated with a syntaxtree or a
      compilation unit.
      
      The fix is simple, it adds a missing null check to this method.
      9ea3dde4
  7. 27 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 30 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 03 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  10. 04 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 26 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  12. 16 1月, 2016 5 次提交
  13. 21 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  14. 19 11月, 2015 2 次提交
  15. 16 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  16. 10 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 19 8月, 2015 4 次提交
    • C
      Adding test for Tomas · 01b802d8
      Cyrus Najmabadi 提交于
      01b802d8
    • C
      Add a few additional tests. · c91cb3ff
      Cyrus Najmabadi 提交于
      c91cb3ff
    • C
      Be more conservative about formatting braces across multiple lines when the... · af61dddf
      Cyrus Najmabadi 提交于
      Be more conservative about formatting braces across multiple lines when the tree has missing curlies.
      
      This is to ensure that if you have
      
      ```cs
      class C
      {
          int Foo { get { return
      }
      ```
      
      And you type ```;``` after ```return``` that we don't place the get-accessor on multiple lines.
      In this case the parser thinks the last curly brace belongs to the get-accessor (and thus we
      used to naively think the get-accessor was on multiple lines).
      
      Note: we customize our behavior here depending on which token you're typing.  If you're actually
      typeing the close curly, then we assume the curly belongs to the nearest construct (and thus in
      the above example the 'get-accessor' *would* be on multiple lines).  This is because it's unlikely
      that you would have left the accessor in this unfinished state to go work on some other construct.
      
      However, if you're not actually typing the close curly (and there are misisng close curlies), then
      we'll conservatively assume that the close curly might not belong to us when determining if we
      were written on a single line.
      
      Note: most of the change here is simply due to having to pass along the information about what
      token was being edited.
      af61dddf
    • C
      Add failing test. · 60d39c7a
      Cyrus Najmabadi 提交于
      60d39c7a
  18. 07 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 01 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  20. 30 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 25 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  22. 20 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  23. 18 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  24. 29 1月, 2015 1 次提交