Skip to content
体验新版
项目
组织
正在加载...
登录
切换导航
打开侧边栏
lwm1986
roslyn
提交
68e1fbf5
R
roslyn
项目概览
lwm1986
/
roslyn
与 Fork 源项目一致
从无法访问的项目Fork
通知
1
Star
0
Fork
0
代码
文件
提交
分支
Tags
贡献者
分支图
Diff
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
DevOps
流水线
流水线任务
计划
Wiki
0
Wiki
分析
仓库
DevOps
项目成员
Pages
R
roslyn
项目概览
项目概览
详情
发布
仓库
仓库
文件
提交
分支
标签
贡献者
分支图
比较
Issue
0
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
合并请求
0
Pages
DevOps
DevOps
流水线
流水线任务
计划
分析
分析
仓库分析
DevOps
Wiki
0
Wiki
成员
成员
收起侧边栏
关闭侧边栏
动态
分支图
创建新Issue
流水线任务
提交
Issue看板
体验新版 GitCode,发现更多精彩内容 >>
提交
68e1fbf5
编写于
4月 13, 2017
作者:
K
Kevin Pilch
浏览文件
操作
浏览文件
下载
电子邮件补丁
差异文件
Add back the PR template.
上级
78f5f501
变更
1
隐藏空白更改
内联
并排
Showing
1 changed file
with
33 addition
and
0 deletion
+33
-0
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
+33
-0
未找到文件。
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
0 → 100644
浏览文件 @
68e1fbf5
**Customer scenario**
What does the customer do to get into this situation, and why do we think this
is common enough to address in Escrow. (Granted, sometimes this will be
obvious "Open project, VS crashes" but in general, I need to understand how
common a scenario is)
**Bugs this fixes:**
(either VSO or GitHub links)
**Workarounds, if any**
Also, why we think they are insufficient for RC vs. RC2, RC3, or RTW
**Risk**
This is generally a measure our how central the affected code is to adjacent
scenarios and thus how likely your fix is to destabilize a broader area of code
**Performance impact**
(with a brief justification for that assessment (e.g. "Low perf impact because no extra allocations/no complexity changes" vs. "Low")
**Is this a regression from a previous update?**
**Root cause analysis:**
How did we miss it? What tests are we adding to guard against it in the future?
**How was the bug found?**
(E.g. customer reported it vs. ad hoc testing)
编辑
预览
Markdown
is supported
0%
请重试
或
添加新附件
.
添加附件
取消
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
取消
想要评论请
注册
或
登录