1. 06 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  2. 05 2月, 2020 2 次提交
  3. 04 2月, 2020 2 次提交
  4. 23 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 22 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  6. 17 1月, 2020 2 次提交
  7. 14 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  8. 03 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  9. 19 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  10. 17 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 16 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  12. 12 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 11 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  14. 10 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 07 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  16. 19 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  17. 18 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  18. 16 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 10 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  20. 02 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 30 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  22. 28 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  23. 24 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  24. 18 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  25. 10 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  26. 07 9月, 2019 1 次提交
    • J
      Use delete_all for deleting events · f2754e41
      Jan Provaznik 提交于
      Because we don't have any destroy callbacks (or other logic
      triggered on event destroy), there is no reason for deleting events
      inefficiently one by one, instead we can use :delete_all.
      f2754e41
  27. 28 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  28. 27 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  29. 21 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  30. 05 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 25 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  32. 23 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  33. 16 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  34. 10 7月, 2019 1 次提交
    • B
      Set the name of a user-namespace to the user name · 5f088300
      Bob Van Landuyt 提交于
      Instead of setting the name of the namespace to the user's username,
      set it to the user's name.
      
      This is more consistent with how we name the routes:
      The route-name of a namespace is the human name of the routable. In
      the case of a user-namespace, this is the owner's name.
      
      When we change a user's name (both on create and update), we now also
      update the namespace-name to the user's name. This will make sure that
      if we also correctly update all the nested routes.
      5f088300
  35. 02 7月, 2019 2 次提交
    • S
      Fix failing spec/models/user_spec.rb · 618fbde2
      Stan Hu 提交于
      618fbde2
    • S
      Use an uncached application setting for usage ping checks · 7db32c40
      Stan Hu 提交于
      The introduction of the in-memory cache for application settings had a
      side effect of making it harder to invalidate changes when the settings
      occur. We now bypass the cache because it's possible the admin enabled
      the usage ping, and we don't want to annoy the user again if they
      already set the value.
      
      To avoid causing significant load on the system, we add an extra check
      to ensure the user is an admin. and we don't want to annoy the user
      again if they already set the value. This is a bit of hack, but the
      alternative would be to put in a more complex cache invalidation
      step. Since this call only gets called in the uncommon situation where
      the user is an admin and the only user in the instance, this shouldn't
      cause too much load on the system.
      7db32c40
  36. 19 6月, 2019 1 次提交