1. 09 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 18 11月, 2015 2 次提交
    • Y
      Added Event.limit_recent · 01620dd7
      Yorick Peterse 提交于
      This will be used to move some querying logic from the users controller
      to the Event model (where it belongs).
      01620dd7
    • Y
      Faster way of obtaining latest event update time · 054f2f98
      Yorick Peterse 提交于
      Instead of using MAX(events.updated_at) we can simply sort the events in
      descending order by the "id" column and grab the first row. In other
      words, instead of this:
      
          SELECT max(events.updated_at) AS max_id
          FROM events
          LEFT OUTER JOIN projects   ON projects.id   = events.project_id
          LEFT OUTER JOIN namespaces ON namespaces.id = projects.namespace_id
          WHERE events.author_id IS NOT NULL
          AND events.project_id IN (13083);
      
      we can use this:
      
          SELECT events.updated_at AS max_id
          FROM events
          LEFT OUTER JOIN projects   ON projects.id   = events.project_id
          LEFT OUTER JOIN namespaces ON namespaces.id = projects.namespace_id
          WHERE events.author_id IS NOT NULL
          AND events.project_id IN (13083)
          ORDER BY events.id DESC
          LIMIT 1;
      
      This has the benefit that on PostgreSQL a backwards index scan can be
      used, which due to the "LIMIT 1" will at most process only a single row.
      This in turn greatly speeds up the process of grabbing the latest update
      time. This can be confirmed by looking at the query plans. The first
      query produces the following plan:
      
          Aggregate  (cost=43779.84..43779.85 rows=1 width=12) (actual time=2142.462..2142.462 rows=1 loops=1)
            ->  Index Scan using index_events_on_project_id on events  (cost=0.43..43704.69 rows=30060 width=12) (actual time=0.033..2138.086 rows=32769 loops=1)
                  Index Cond: (project_id = 13083)
                  Filter: (author_id IS NOT NULL)
          Planning time: 1.248 ms
          Execution time: 2142.548 ms
      
      The second query in turn produces the following plan:
      
          Limit  (cost=0.43..41.65 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=1.394..1.394 rows=1 loops=1)
            ->  Index Scan Backward using events_pkey on events  (cost=0.43..1238907.96 rows=30060 width=16) (actual time=1.394..1.394 rows=1 loops=1)
                  Filter: ((author_id IS NOT NULL) AND (project_id = 13083))
                  Rows Removed by Filter: 2104
          Planning time: 0.166 ms
          Execution time: 1.408 ms
      
      According to the above plans the 2nd query is around 1500 times faster.
      However, re-running the first query produces timings of around 80 ms,
      making the 2nd query "only" around 55 times faster.
      054f2f98
  3. 13 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  4. 04 11月, 2014 2 次提交
  5. 18 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 09 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 15 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 27 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 13 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 15 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 20 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  12. 13 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  13. 09 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  14. 15 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 10 9月, 2012 2 次提交
  16. 03 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 29 8月, 2012 3 次提交
  18. 11 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 27 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  20. 02 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  21. 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  22. 29 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  23. 28 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  24. 16 2月, 2012 1 次提交