- 06 10月, 2016 39 次提交
-
-
由 Kamil Trzcinski 提交于
-
由 Kamil Trzcinski 提交于
-
由 Kamil Trzcinski 提交于
-
由 Kamil Trzcinski 提交于
-
由 Filipa Lacerda 提交于
-
由 Filipa Lacerda 提交于
-
由 Filipa Lacerda 提交于
-
由 Filipa Lacerda 提交于
-
由 Filipa Lacerda 提交于
-
由 Filipa Lacerda 提交于
-
由 Filipa Lacerda 提交于
-
由 Filipa Lacerda 提交于
-
由 Filipa Lacerda 提交于
-
由 Rémy Coutable 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
由 Yorick Peterse 提交于
Gitlab::Redis bigger connection pool on sidekiq workers See merge request !6657
-
由 Achilleas Pipinellis 提交于
Document GIT_STRATEGY=none ## What does this MR do? Adds documentation for the new `GIT_STRATEGY=none` option in GitLab Runner v1.7 ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Speling and grammar, of course. I'm using the term 'project workspace' to refer to the build directory, which is a Jenkins-ism. Is there preferred alternative wording? ## Why was this MR needed? Discoverability of new feature ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - <strike>[ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added</strike> - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - <strike>[ ] API support added</strike> - <strike>Tests</strike> - <strike>[ ] Added for this feature/bug</strike> - <strike>[ ] All builds are passing</strike> - <strike>[ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)</strike> - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21337 Depends on http://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner/merge_requests/332 See merge request !6577
-
由 Achilleas Pipinellis 提交于
Add more info in Cycle Analytics docs - Clarify the Plan to Code stages in Cycle Analytics docs based on feedback https://about.gitlab.com/2016/09/21/cycle-analytics-feature-highlight/#comment-2915715168 - Add a workflow example See merge request !6562
-
由 Paco Guzman 提交于
-
由 Achilleas Pipinellis 提交于
[ci skip]
-
由 Kamil Trzciński 提交于
Improve asynchronous pipeline processing ## What does this MR do? This MR improves asynchronous processing of pipeline. ## Why was this MR needed? It eliminates some race conditions and improves performance. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing ## What are the relevant issue / merge request numbers? Related merge request: !6410 Extracted from !6411 See merge request !6650
-
由 Rémy Coutable 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
由 Rémy Coutable 提交于
Don't allow flay to fail. It's passing now so there's no reason to have it set to allow failure anymore. See merge request !6707
-
由 Rémy Coutable 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
由 Rémy Coutable 提交于
-
由 Rémy Coutable 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
由 Connor Shea 提交于
-
由 Nick Thomas 提交于
[ci skip]
-
由 Fatih Acet 提交于
Prevent flash alert text from being obscured when container is fluid ## What does this MR do? Fixes [a regression](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/a2af7790) that causes the text within server-initiated flash *alerts* (not flash *notices*) to be obscured when `.container-fluid` is applied. It was reported in relation to a cherry-picking flash alert, but the problem occurs with all server-initiated flash alerts contained by a fluid container. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Note that as part of this fix, I combined some duplicate code and removed `.flash-text` & `.content-wrapper` selectors as they didn't seem to be necessary. I manually tested JS-initiated Flash alerts to make sure this doesn't affect their appearance. I also grepped around for anything else that might depend on these styles. Everything checked out. But... can *you* see something this is going to break? ## Why was this MR needed? Affected users can't read flash alerts. ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.38_PM](/uploads/af258585e428d82dc2b293434661790b/Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.38_PM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.47_PM](/uploads/75a93235440e2b83088e66bbe53d6cee/Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.47_PM.png) JS-initiated flash alert (unaffected): ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.39.57_PM](/uploads/ba678cfaeb09c639499059712a33abe8/Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.39.57_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22915 cc: @jschatz1 See merge request !6694
-
由 Fatih Acet 提交于
Updated issuable form with GL dropdowns ## What does this MR do? This adds back in the GL dropdowns into the issuable form but fixes a lot of usability issues & bugs. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19879, #19882, #19881, #19883, #19880 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.09](/uploads/f1df758b3fb59958b4e6b62960b81bfb/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.09.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.13](/uploads/6e4fd8f4d874b14eaab6b10752a19df4/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.13.png) See merge request !5293
-
由 Fatih Acet 提交于
fix group links 404 ### What does this MR do? This MR should fix the 404 page, when creating a new group links without selecting any group from the group dropdown list. ### What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20766 See merge request !6155
-
由 Fatih Acet 提交于
-
由 Fatih Acet 提交于
-
由 Fatih Acet 提交于
Correctly parse the date of artifact expiring ## What does this MR do? Previously the JS was just replacing `-` with `/` however this was breaking when there is a timezone offset. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19600 See merge request !6697
-
由 Dmitriy Zaporozhets 提交于
Cleanup config/routes.rb even further by extracting more routes into separate files Next step after https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6692 See merge request !6698
-
由 Fatih Acet 提交于
# Conflicts: # app/assets/javascripts/dispatcher.js
-
由 Fatih Acet 提交于
-
由 Rémy Coutable 提交于
See !6474.
-
由 Fatih Acet 提交于
added 245px max height and overflow scroll-y to .grouped-pipeline-dropdown ## What does this MR do? It restricts the sub builds popup in the pipeline graph and makes it scrollable ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? none that I know of ## Why was this MR needed? To restrict crazy CI configurations from messing with the viewport scrolling. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![2016-10-05_16.29.35](/uploads/0ce1d8e4d46ec45e181919dd968a80cf/2016-10-05_16.29.35.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22295 See merge request !6696
-
由 Annabel Dunstone Gray 提交于
19499 Update project dropdowns ## What does this MR do? Separates dropdowns on project homepage and makes caret icon consistent. ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-04_at_6.20.27_PM](/uploads/76823e3836db43a60cfcabd67940659f/Screen_Shot_2016-10-04_at_6.20.27_PM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-04_at_6.19.52_PM](/uploads/164e40e1788b1d6a8aed29ab3348370a/Screen_Shot_2016-10-04_at_6.19.52_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19499 See merge request !6687
-
- 05 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitriy Zaporozhets 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-