- 28 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
When t7063 starts, it runs "update-index --untracked-cache" to see if we support the untracked cache. Its output goes straight to stderr, even if the test is not run with "-v". Let's wrap it in a prereq that will hide the output by default, but show it with "-v". Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 13 3月, 2015 24 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
When a good user sees the "too long, consider -uno" advice when running `git status`, they should check out the man page to find out more. This change suggests they try untracked cache before -uno. Helped-by: Nbrian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
If the user enables untracked cache, then - move worktree to an unsupported filesystem - or simply upgrade OS - or move the whole (portable) disk from one machine to another - or access a shared fs from another machine there's no guarantee that untracked cache can still function properly. Record the worktree location and OS footprint in the cache. If it changes, err on the safe side and disable the cache. The user can 'update-index --untracked-cache' again to make sure all conditions are met. This adds a new requirement that setup_git_directory* must be called before read_cache() because we need worktree location by then, or the cache is dropped. This change does not cover all bases, you can fool it if you try hard. The point is to stop accidents. Helped-by: NEric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Helped-by: Nbrian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Helped-by: NTorsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Helped-by: NEric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Helped-by: NEric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Helped-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Overall time saving on "git status" is about 40% in the best case scenario, removing ..collect_untracked() as the most time consuming function. read and refresh index operations are now at the top (which should drop when index-helper and/or watchman support is added). More numbers and analysis below. webkit.git ========== 169k files. 6k dirs. Lots of test data (i.e. not touched most of the time) Base status ----------- Index version 4 in split index mode and cache-tree populated. No untracked cache. It shows how time is consumed by "git status". The same settings are used for other repos below. 18:28:10.199679 builtin/commit.c:1394 performance: 0.000000451 s: cmd_status:setup 18:28:10.474847 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.274873831 s: read_index 18:28:10.475295 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.000000656 s: read_index 18:28:10.728443 preload-index.c:131 performance: 0.253147487 s: read_index_preload 18:28:10.741422 read-cache.c:1254 performance: 0.012868340 s: refresh_index 18:28:10.752300 wt-status.c:623 performance: 0.010421357 s: wt_status_collect_changes_worktree 18:28:10.762069 wt-status.c:629 performance: 0.009644748 s: wt_status_collect_changes_index 18:28:11.601019 wt-status.c:632 performance: 0.838859547 s: wt_status_collect_untracked 18:28:11.605939 builtin/commit.c:1421 performance: 0.004835004 s: cmd_status:update_index 18:28:11.606580 trace.c:415 performance: 1.407878388 s: git command: 'git' 'status' Populating status ----------------- This is after enabling untracked cache and the cache is still empty. We see a slight increase in .._collect_untracked() and update_index (because new cache has to be written to $GIT_DIR/index). 18:28:18.915213 builtin/commit.c:1394 performance: 0.000000326 s: cmd_status:setup 18:28:19.197364 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.281901416 s: read_index 18:28:19.197754 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.000000546 s: read_index 18:28:19.451355 preload-index.c:131 performance: 0.253599607 s: read_index_preload 18:28:19.464400 read-cache.c:1254 performance: 0.012935336 s: refresh_index 18:28:19.475115 wt-status.c:623 performance: 0.010236920 s: wt_status_collect_changes_worktree 18:28:19.486022 wt-status.c:629 performance: 0.010801685 s: wt_status_collect_changes_index 18:28:20.362660 wt-status.c:632 performance: 0.876551366 s: wt_status_collect_untracked 18:28:20.396199 builtin/commit.c:1421 performance: 0.033447969 s: cmd_status:update_index 18:28:20.396939 trace.c:415 performance: 1.482695902 s: git command: 'git' 'status' Populated status ---------------- After the cache is populated, wt_status_collect_untracked() drops 82% from 0.838s to 0.144s. Overall time drops 45%. Top offenders are now read_index() and read_index_preload(). 18:28:20.408605 builtin/commit.c:1394 performance: 0.000000457 s: cmd_status:setup 18:28:20.692864 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.283980458 s: read_index 18:28:20.693273 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.000000661 s: read_index 18:28:20.958814 preload-index.c:131 performance: 0.265540254 s: read_index_preload 18:28:20.972375 read-cache.c:1254 performance: 0.013437429 s: refresh_index 18:28:20.983959 wt-status.c:623 performance: 0.011146646 s: wt_status_collect_changes_worktree 18:28:20.993948 wt-status.c:629 performance: 0.009879094 s: wt_status_collect_changes_index 18:28:21.138125 wt-status.c:632 performance: 0.144084737 s: wt_status_collect_untracked 18:28:21.173678 builtin/commit.c:1421 performance: 0.035463949 s: cmd_status:update_index 18:28:21.174251 trace.c:415 performance: 0.766707355 s: git command: 'git' 'status' gentoo-x86.git ============== This repository is a strange one with a balanced, wide and shallow worktree (about 100k files and 23k dirs) and no .gitignore in worktree. .._collect_untracked() time drops 88%, total time drops 56%. Base status ----------- 18:20:40.828642 builtin/commit.c:1394 performance: 0.000000496 s: cmd_status:setup 18:20:41.027233 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.198130532 s: read_index 18:20:41.027670 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.000000581 s: read_index 18:20:41.171716 preload-index.c:131 performance: 0.144045594 s: read_index_preload 18:20:41.179171 read-cache.c:1254 performance: 0.007320424 s: refresh_index 18:20:41.185785 wt-status.c:623 performance: 0.006144638 s: wt_status_collect_changes_worktree 18:20:41.192701 wt-status.c:629 performance: 0.006780184 s: wt_status_collect_changes_index 18:20:41.991723 wt-status.c:632 performance: 0.798927029 s: wt_status_collect_untracked 18:20:41.994664 builtin/commit.c:1421 performance: 0.002852772 s: cmd_status:update_index 18:20:41.995458 trace.c:415 performance: 1.168427502 s: git command: 'git' 'status' Populating status ----------------- 18:20:48.968848 builtin/commit.c:1394 performance: 0.000000380 s: cmd_status:setup 18:20:49.172918 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.203734214 s: read_index 18:20:49.173341 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.000000562 s: read_index 18:20:49.320013 preload-index.c:131 performance: 0.146671391 s: read_index_preload 18:20:49.328039 read-cache.c:1254 performance: 0.007921957 s: refresh_index 18:20:49.334680 wt-status.c:623 performance: 0.006172020 s: wt_status_collect_changes_worktree 18:20:49.342526 wt-status.c:629 performance: 0.007731746 s: wt_status_collect_changes_index 18:20:50.257510 wt-status.c:632 performance: 0.914864222 s: wt_status_collect_untracked 18:20:50.338371 builtin/commit.c:1421 performance: 0.080776477 s: cmd_status:update_index 18:20:50.338900 trace.c:415 performance: 1.371462446 s: git command: 'git' 'status' Populated status ---------------- 18:20:50.351160 builtin/commit.c:1394 performance: 0.000000571 s: cmd_status:setup 18:20:50.577358 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.225917338 s: read_index 18:20:50.577794 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.000000617 s: read_index 18:20:50.734140 preload-index.c:131 performance: 0.156345564 s: read_index_preload 18:20:50.745717 read-cache.c:1254 performance: 0.011463075 s: refresh_index 18:20:50.755176 wt-status.c:623 performance: 0.008877929 s: wt_status_collect_changes_worktree 18:20:50.763768 wt-status.c:629 performance: 0.008471633 s: wt_status_collect_changes_index 18:20:50.854885 wt-status.c:632 performance: 0.090988721 s: wt_status_collect_untracked 18:20:50.857765 builtin/commit.c:1421 performance: 0.002789097 s: cmd_status:update_index 18:20:50.858411 trace.c:415 performance: 0.508647673 s: git command: 'git' 'status' linux-2.6 ========= Reference repo. Not too big. .._collect_status() drops 84%. Total time drops 42%. Base status ----------- 18:34:09.870122 builtin/commit.c:1394 performance: 0.000000385 s: cmd_status:setup 18:34:09.943218 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.072871177 s: read_index 18:34:09.943614 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.000000491 s: read_index 18:34:10.004364 preload-index.c:131 performance: 0.060748102 s: read_index_preload 18:34:10.008190 read-cache.c:1254 performance: 0.003714285 s: refresh_index 18:34:10.012087 wt-status.c:623 performance: 0.002775446 s: wt_status_collect_changes_worktree 18:34:10.016054 wt-status.c:629 performance: 0.003862140 s: wt_status_collect_changes_index 18:34:10.214747 wt-status.c:632 performance: 0.198604837 s: wt_status_collect_untracked 18:34:10.216102 builtin/commit.c:1421 performance: 0.001244166 s: cmd_status:update_index 18:34:10.216817 trace.c:415 performance: 0.347670735 s: git command: 'git' 'status' Populating status ----------------- 18:34:16.595102 builtin/commit.c:1394 performance: 0.000000456 s: cmd_status:setup 18:34:16.666600 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.070992413 s: read_index 18:34:16.667012 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.000000606 s: read_index 18:34:16.729375 preload-index.c:131 performance: 0.062362492 s: read_index_preload 18:34:16.732565 read-cache.c:1254 performance: 0.003075517 s: refresh_index 18:34:16.736148 wt-status.c:623 performance: 0.002422201 s: wt_status_collect_changes_worktree 18:34:16.739990 wt-status.c:629 performance: 0.003746618 s: wt_status_collect_changes_index 18:34:16.948505 wt-status.c:632 performance: 0.208426710 s: wt_status_collect_untracked 18:34:16.961744 builtin/commit.c:1421 performance: 0.013151887 s: cmd_status:update_index 18:34:16.962233 trace.c:415 performance: 0.368537535 s: git command: 'git' 'status' Populated status ---------------- 18:34:16.970026 builtin/commit.c:1394 performance: 0.000000631 s: cmd_status:setup 18:34:17.046235 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.075904673 s: read_index 18:34:17.046644 read-cache.c:1407 performance: 0.000000681 s: read_index 18:34:17.113564 preload-index.c:131 performance: 0.066920253 s: read_index_preload 18:34:17.117281 read-cache.c:1254 performance: 0.003604055 s: refresh_index 18:34:17.121115 wt-status.c:623 performance: 0.002508345 s: wt_status_collect_changes_worktree 18:34:17.125089 wt-status.c:629 performance: 0.003871636 s: wt_status_collect_changes_index 18:34:17.156089 wt-status.c:632 performance: 0.030895703 s: wt_status_collect_untracked 18:34:17.169861 builtin/commit.c:1421 performance: 0.013686404 s: cmd_status:update_index 18:34:17.170391 trace.c:415 performance: 0.201474531 s: git command: 'git' 'status' Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
update_index_if_able() is moved down so that the updated untracked cache could be written out. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
This can be used to double check if results with untracked cache are correctly, compared to vanilla version. Untracked cache remains in index, but not used. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
This could be used to verify correct behavior in tests Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
When a directory is updated within the same second that its timestamp is last saved, we cannot realize the directory has been updated by checking timestamps. Assume the worst (something is update). See 29e4d363 (Racy GIT - 2005-12-20) for more information. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Ideally we should implement untracked_cache_remove_from_index() and untracked_cache_add_to_index() so that they update untracked cache right away instead of invalidating it and wait for read_directory() next time to deal with it. But that may need some more work in unpack-trees.c. So stay simple as the first step. The new call in add_index_entry_with_check() may look strange because new calls usually stay close to cache_tree_invalidate_path(). We do it a bit later than c_t_i_p() in this function because if it's about replacing the entry with the same name, we don't care (but cache-tree does). Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Helped-by: NStefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
This cuts down a signficant number of open(.gitignore) because most directories usually don't have .gitignore files. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
If we redo this thing in a functional style, we would have one struct untracked_dir as input tree and another as output. The input is used for verification. The output is a brand new tree, reflecting current worktree. But that means recreate a lot of dir nodes even if a lot could be shared between input and output trees in good cases. So we go with the messy but efficient way, combining both input and output trees into one. We need a way to know which node in this combined tree belongs to the output. This is the purpose of this "recurse" flag. "valid" bit can't be used for this because it's about data of the node except the subdirs. When we invalidate a directory, we want to keep cached data of the subdirs intact even though we don't really know what subdir still exists (yet). Then we check worktree to see what actual subdir remains on disk. Those will have 'recurse' bit set again. If cached data for those are still valid, we may be able to avoid computing exclude files for them. Those subdirs that are deleted will have 'recurse' remained clear and their 'valid' bits do not matter. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
The main readdir loop in read_directory_recursive() is replaced with a new one that checks if cached results of a directory is still valid. If a file is added or removed from the index, the containing directory is invalidated (but not its subdirs). If directory's mtime is changed, the same happens. If a .gitignore is updated, the containing directory and all subdirs are invalidated recursively. If dir_struct#flags or other conditions change, the cache is ignored. If a directory is invalidated, we opendir/readdir/closedir and run the exclude machinery on that directory listing as usual. If untracked cache is also enabled, we'll update the cache along the way. If a directory is validated, we simply pull the untracked listing out from the cache. The cache also records the list of direct subdirs that we have to recurse in. Fully excluded directories are seen as "untracked files". In the best case when no dirs are invalidated, read_directory() becomes a series of stat(dir), open(.gitignore), fstat(), read(), close() and optionally hash_sha1_file() For comparison, standard read_directory() is a sequence of opendir(), readdir(), open(.gitignore), fstat(), read(), close(), the expensive last_exclude_matching() and closedir(). We already try not to open(.gitignore) if we know it does not exist, so open/fstat/read/close sequence does not apply to every directory. The sequence could be reduced further, as noted in prep_exclude() in another patch. So in theory, the entire best-case read_directory sequence could be reduced to a series of stat() and nothing else. This is not a silver bullet approach. When you compile a C file, for example, the old .o file is removed and a new one with the same name created, effectively invalidating the containing directory's cache (but not its subdirectories). If your build process touches every directory, this cache adds extra overhead for nothing, so it's a good idea to separate generated files from tracked files.. Editors may use the same strategy for saving files. And of course you're out of luck running your repo on an unsupported filesystem and/or operating system. Helped-by: NEric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
This allows us to feed different info to read_directory_recursive() based on untracked cache in the next patch. Helped-by: NRamsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
It's easy to see that if an existing .gitignore changes, its SHA-1 would be different and invalidate_gitignore() is called. If .gitignore is removed, add_excludes() will treat it like an empty .gitignore, which again should invalidate the cached directory data. if .gitignore is added, lookup_untracked() already fills initial .gitignore SHA-1 as "empty file", so again invalidate_gitignore() is called. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Make sure the starting conditions and all global exclude files are good to go. If not, either disable untracked cache completely, or wipe out the cache and start fresh. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
The idea is if we can capture all input and (non-rescursive) output of read_directory_recursive(), and can verify later that all the input is the same, then the second r_d_r() should produce the same output as in the first run. The requirement for this to work is stat info of a directory MUST change if an entry is added to or removed from that directory (and should not change often otherwise). If your OS and filesystem do not meet this requirement, untracked cache is not for you. Most file systems on *nix should be fine. On Windows, NTFS is fine while FAT may not be [1] even though FAT on Linux seems to be fine. The list of input of r_d_r() is in the big comment block in dir.h. In short, the output of a directory (not counting subdirs) mainly depends on stat info of the directory in question, all .gitignore leading to it and the check_only flag when r_d_r() is called recursively. This patch records all this info (and the output) as r_d_r() runs. Two hash_sha1_file() are required for $GIT_DIR/info/exclude and core.excludesfile unless their stat data matches. hash_sha1_file() is only needed when .gitignore files in the worktree are modified, otherwise their SHA-1 in index is used (see the previous patch). We could store stat data for .gitignore files so we don't have to rehash them if their content is different from index, but I think .gitignore files are rarely modified, so not worth extra cache data (and hashing penalty read-cache.c:verify_hdr(), as we will be storing this as an index extension). The implication is, if you change .gitignore, you better add it to the index soon or you lose all the benefit of untracked cache because a modified .gitignore invalidates all subdirs recursively. This is especially bad for .gitignore at root. This cached output is about untracked files only, not ignored files because the number of tracked files is usually small, so small cache overhead, while the number of ignored files could go really high (e.g. *.o files mixing with source code). [1] "Description of NTFS date and time stamps for files and folders" http://support.microsoft.com/kb/299648Helped-by: NTorsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> Helped-by: NDavid Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
This is not used anywhere yet. But the goal is to compare quickly if a .gitignore file has changed when we have the SHA-1 of both old (cached somewhere) and new (from index or a tree) versions. Helped-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Helped-by: NTorsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 11 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Various issues around "reflog expire", e.g. using --updateref when expiring a reflog for a symbolic reference, have been corrected and/or made saner. * mh/expire-updateref-fixes: reflog_expire(): never update a reference to null_sha1 reflog_expire(): ignore --updateref for symbolic references reflog: improve and update documentation struct ref_lock: delete the force_write member lock_ref_sha1_basic(): do not set force_write for missing references write_ref_sha1(): move write elision test to callers write_ref_sha1(): remove check for lock == NULL
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
A corrupt input to "git diff -M" can cause us to segfault. * jk/diffcore-rename-duplicate: diffcore-rename: avoid processing duplicate destinations diffcore-rename: split locate_rename_dst into two functions
-
- 07 3月, 2015 12 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The borrowed code in kwset API did not follow our usual convention to use "unsigned char" to store values that range from 0-255. * bw/kwset-use-unsigned: kwset: use unsigned char to store values with high-bit set
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
* ak/t5516-typofix: t5516: correct misspelled pushInsteadOf
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The interaction between "git submodule update" and the submodule.*.update configuration was not clearly documented. * ms/submodule-update-config-doc: submodule: improve documentation of update subcommand
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The prompt string "remove?" used when "git clean -i" asks the user if a path should be removed was localizable, but the code always expects a substring of "yes" to tell it to go ahead. Always show [y/N] as part of this prompt to hint that the answer is not (yet) localized. * ja/clean-confirm-i18n: Add hint interactive cleaning
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
"git diff --shortstat --dirstat=changes" showed a dirstat based on lines that was never asked by the end user in addition to the dirstat that the user asked for. * mk/diff-shortstat-dirstat-fix: diff --shortstat --dirstat: remove duplicate output
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
"git remote add" mentioned "--tags" and "--no-tags" and was not clear that fetch from the remote in the future will use the default behaviour when neither is given to override it. * mg/doc-remote-tags-or-not: git-remote.txt: describe behavior without --tags and --no-tags
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Description given by "grep -h" for its --exclude-standard option was phrased poorly. * nd/grep-exclude-standard-help-fix: grep: correct help string for --exclude-standard
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Documentation update. * mr/doc-clean-f-f: Documentation/git-clean.txt: document that -f may need to be given twice
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Compilation fix for a recent topic in 'master'. * ye/http-accept-language: gettext.c: move get_preferred_languages() from http.c
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
* maint: Git 2.3.2
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-