- 21 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
All the other config variables use CamelCase. This config variable should not be an exception. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
The function lock_remote() sends MKCOL requests to make leading directories; However, if it does not put a forward slash '/' at the end of the path, the server sends a 301 redirect. By leaving the '/' in place, we can avoid this additional step. Incidentally, at least one version of Curl (7.16.3) does not resend credentials when it follows a 301 redirect, so this commit also fixes a bug. Original patch by Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 16 1月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Stephan Beyer 提交于
Add a test case for the bugfix introduced by commit c14c3c82 "git-rebase--interactive: auto amend only edited commit". Signed-off-by: NStephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Stephan Beyer 提交于
Add a test case for the bugfix introduced by commit 8beb1f33 "git-rebase-interactive: do not squash commits on abort". Signed-off-by: NStephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Stephan Beyer 提交于
The basic idea of t3501 is to check whether revert and cherry-pick works on renamed files. But as there is no pure cherry-pick/revert test, it is good to also check if commits are actually done in that scenario. Signed-off-by: NStephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Miklos Vajna 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Michael J Gruber 提交于
The "-k" option to "git mv" should allow specifying multiple untracked files. Currently, multiple untracked files raise an assertion if they appear consecutively as arguments. Fix this by decrementing the loop index after removing one entry from the array of arguments. Signed-off-by: NMichael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Michael J Gruber 提交于
Add test cases for ignoring nonexisting and untracked files using the -k option to "git mv". There is one known breakage related to multiple untracked files specfied as consecutive arguments. Signed-off-by: NMichael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Rast 提交于
Accept -- as an "end of options" marker even when using --no-index. Previously, the -- triggered a "normal" index/tree diff and subsequently failed because of the unrecognized (in that mode) --no-index. Note that the second loop can treat '--' as a normal option, because the preceding checks ensure it is the third-to-last argument. While at it, fix the parsing of "-q" option in --no-index mode as well. Signed-off-by: NThomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
It comes quite as a surprise to an unsuspecting Git user that calling "git add submodule/file" (which is a mistake, alright) _removes_ the submodule in the index, and adds the file. Instead, complain loudly. While at it, be nice when the user said "git add submodule/" which is most likely the consequence of tab-completion, and stage the submodule, instead of trying to add the contents of that directory. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
"git checkout -b newbranch $commit^{tree}" mistakenly created a new branch rooted at the current HEAD, because in that case, the two structure fields used to see if the command was invoked without any argument (hence it needs to default to checking out the HEAD) were populated incorrectly. Upon seeing a command line argument that we took as a rev, we should store that string in new.name, even if that does not name a commit. This will correctly trigger the existing safety logic. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
-
- 03 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
A git patch that does not change the executable bit records the mode bits on its "index" line. "git apply" used to interpret this mode exactly the same way as it interprets the mode recorded on "new mode" line, as the wish by the patch submitter to set the mode to the one recorded on the line. The reason the mode does not agree between the submitter and the receiver in the first place is because there is _another_ commit that only appears on one side but not the other since their histories diverged, and that commit changes the mode. The patch has "index" line but not "new mode" line because its change is about updating the contents without affecting the mode. The application of such a patch is an explicit wish by the submitter to only cherry-pick the commit that updates the contents without cherry-picking the commit that modifies the mode. Viewed this way, the current behaviour is problematic, even though the command does warn when the mode of the path being patched does not match this mode, and a careful user could detect this inconsistencies between the patch submitter and the patch receiver. This changes the semantics of the mode recorded on the "index" line; instead of interpreting it as the submitter's wish to set the mode to the recorded value, it merely informs what the mode submitter happened to have, and the presense of the "index" line is taken as submitter's wish to keep whatever the mode is on the receiving end. This is based on the patch originally done by Alexander Potashev with a minor fix; the tests are mine. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 27 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
In 212945d4 ("Teach git-describe to verify annotated tag names before output") git-describe learned how to output a warning if an annotated tag object was matched but its internal name doesn't match the local ref name. However, "git describe --all" causes the local ref name to be prefixed with "tags/", so we need to skip over this prefix before comparing the local ref name with the name recorded inside of the tag object. Patch-by: NRené Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 25 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
When a file was renamed in one branch, but deleted in the other, one should expect the index to contain an unmerged entry, namely the target of the rename. Make it so. Noticed by Constantine Plotnikov. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 24 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
The result is easier to review this way, and the merge resolution has to be done inside the work tree, not by adjusting "the patch" anyway.
-
- 23 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miklos Vajna 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 21 12月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
We cleaned up lockfiles upon receiving the usual suspects HUP, TERM, QUIT but a wicked user could kill us of asphyxiation by piping our output to a pipe that does not read. Protect ourselves by catching SIGPIPE and clean up the lockfiles as well in such a case. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Marcel M. Cary 提交于
I want directories of my working tree to be linked to from various paths on my filesystem where third-party components expect them, both in development and production environments. A build system's install step could solve this, but I develop scripts and web pages that don't need to be built. Git's submodule system could solve this, but we tend to develop, branch, and test those directories all in unison, so one big repository feels more natural. We prefer to edit and commit on the symlinked paths, not the canonical ones, and in that setting, "git pull" fails to find the top-level directory of the repository while other commands work fine. "git pull" fails because POSIX shells have a notion of current working directory that is different from getcwd(). The shell stores this path in PWD. As a result, "cd ../" can be interpreted differently in a shell script than chdir("../") in a C program. The shell interprets "../" by essentially stripping the last textual path component from PWD, whereas C chdir() follows the ".." link in the current directory on the filesystem. When PWD is a symlink, these are different destinations. As a result, Git's C commands find the correct top-level working tree, and shell scripts do not. Changes: * When interpreting a relative upward (../) path in cd_to_toplevel, prepend the cwd without symlinks, given by /bin/pwd * Add tests for cd_to_toplevel and "git pull" in a symlinked directory that failed before this fix, plus contrasting scenarios that already worked Signed-off-by: NMarcel M. Cary <marcel@oak.homeunix.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
When a merge that has a conflict was rebased, then rebase stopped to let the user resolve the conflicts. However, thereafter --continue failed because the author-script was not saved. (This is rebase -i's way to preserve a commit's authorship.) This fixes it by doing taking the same failure route after a merge that is also taken after a normal cherry-pick. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
This extends t3409-rebase-preserve-merges by a case where the merge that is rebased has a conflict. Therefore, the rebase stops and expects that the user resolves the conflict. However, currently rebase --continue fails because .git/rebase-merge/author-script is missing. The test script had allocated two identical clones, but only one of them (clone2) was used. Now we use both as indicated in the comment. Also, two instances of && was missing in the setup part. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 20 12月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Even though newer Porcelain tools always record the tagger information when creating new tags, export/import pair should be able to faithfully reproduce ancient tag objects that lack tagger information. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Acked-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
When no tagger was found (old Git produced tags like this), no "tagger" line is printed (but this is incompatible with the current git fast-import). Alternatively, you can pass the option --fake-missing-tagger, forcing fast-export to fake a tagger Unspecified Tagger <no-tagger> with a tag date of the beginning of (Unix) time in the case of a missing tagger, so that fast-import is still able to import the result. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael J Gruber 提交于
Add a test which checks that negated patterns such as "!foo.html" can override previous patterns such as "*.html". This is documented behaviour but had not been tested so far. Signed-off-by: NMichael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 15 12月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When merge-recursive wanted to create a new file in the work tree (either as the final result, or a hint for reference purposes while delete/modify conflicts), it unconditionally overwrote an untracked file in the working tree. Be careful not to lose whatever the user has that is not tracked. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Clemens Buchacher 提交于
If a file was removed in HEAD, but modified in MERGE_HEAD, recursive merge will result in a "CONFLICT (delete/modify)". If the (now untracked) file already exists and was not added to the index, it is overwritten with the conflict resolution contents. In similar situations (cf. test 2), the merge would abort with "error: Untracked working tree 'file' would be overwritten by merge." The same should happen in this case. Signed-off-by: NClemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When a tag points at a bad or nonexistent object, we should diagnose the breakage and exit. An earlier commit 4f3dcc27 (Fix 'git show' on signed tag of signed tag of commit, 2008-07-01) lost this check and made it segfault instead; not good. This fixes it. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
In dc871831(Only use GIT_CONFIG in "git config", not other programs), GIT_CONFIG_LOCAL was rested in peace, in favor of not reading /etc/gitconfig and $HOME/.gitconfig at all when GIT_CONFIG is set. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Brandon Casey 提交于
Make it easier to recover from a mistaken branch deletion by displaying the sha1 of the branch's tip commit. Update t3200 test to match the change in output. Signed-off-by: NBrandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 11 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When I tweaked the patch to use $SHELL_PATH instead of a hard-coded "#!/bin/sh" to produce 3aa1f7ca (diff: respect textconv in rewrite diffs, 2008-12-09), I screwed up. This should fix it. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 12月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
Currently we just skip rewrite diffs for binary files; this patch makes an exception for files which will be textconv'd, and actually performs the textconv before generating the diff. Conceptually, rewrite diffs should be in the exact same format as the a non-rewrite diff, except that we refuse to share any context. Thus it makes very little sense for "git diff" to show a textconv'd diff, but for "git diff -B" to show "Binary files differ". Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
The current emit_rewrite_diff code always writes a text patch without checking whether the content is binary. This means that if you end up with a rewrite diff for a binary file, you get lots of raw binary goo in your patch. Instead, if we have binary files, then let's just skip emit_rewrite_diff altogether. We will already have shown the "dissimilarity index" line, so it is really about the diff contents. If binary diffs are turned off, the "Binary files a/file and b/file differ" message should be the same in either case. If we do have binary patches turned on, there isn't much point in making a less-efficient binary patch that does a total rewrite; no human is going to read it, and since binary patches don't apply with any fuzz anyway, the result of application should be the same. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 09 12月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Deskin Miller 提交于
find_parent_branch generates branch@rev type branches when one has to look back through SVN history to properly get the history for a branch copied from somewhere not already being tracked by git-svn. If in the process of fetching this history, git-svn is interrupted, then when one fetches again, it will use whatever was last fetched as the parent commit and fail to fetch any more history which it didn't get to before being terminated. This is especially troubling in that different git-svn copies of the same SVN repository can end up with different commit sha1s, incorrectly showing the history as divergent and precluding easy collaboration using git push and fetch. To fix this, when we initialise the Git::SVN object $gs to search for and perhaps fetch history, we check if there are any commits in SVN in the range between the current revision $gs is at, and the top revision for which we were asked to fill history. If there are commits we're missing in that range, we continue the fetch from the current revision to the top, properly getting all history before using it as the parent for the branch we're trying to create. Signed-off-by: NDeskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu> Acked-by: NEric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jakub Narebski 提交于
In insert_file() subroutine (which is used to insert HTML fragments as custom header, footer, hometext (for projects list view), and per project README.html (for summary view)) we used: map(to_utf8, <$fd>); This doesn't work, and other form has to be used: map { to_utf8($_) } <$fd>; Now with test for t9600 added, for $GIT_DIR/README.html. Signed-off-by: NJakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 08 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt McCutchen 提交于
According to the message of commit 0fe7c1de, "git diff" with three or more trees expects the merged tree first followed by the parents, in order. However, this command reversed the order of its arguments, resulting in confusing diffs. A comment /* Again, the revs are all reverse */ suggested there was a reason for this, but I can't figure out the reason, so I removed the reversal of the arguments. Test case included. Signed-off-by: NMatt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net> Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 06 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
All other state files use dash in their names, not underscores. Also, there is no reason to call this "extra". Drop it. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 05 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
These tests make sure that "git am" does not lose command line options specified when it was started, after it is interrupted by a patch that does not apply earlier in the series. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 03 12月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Deskin Miller 提交于
The 'branch' subcommand incorrectly had the svn-remote to use hardcoded as 'svn', the default remote name. This meant that branches derived from other svn-remotes would try to use the branch and tag configuration for the 'svn' remote, potentially copying would-be branches to the wrong place in SVN, into the branch namespace for another project. Fix this by using the remote name extracted from the svn info for the specified git ref. Add a testcase for this behaviour. [jc: squashed in a fix to test from Michael J Gruber for older svn (1.4)] Signed-off-by: NDeskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu> Acked-by: NEric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
There are printfs around that do not grok '\1', but need '\01'. Discovered on AIX 4.3.x. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Christian Couder 提交于
The patch that allows "git bisect skip" to be passed a range of commits using the "<commit1>..<commit2>" notation is flawed because it introduces a regression when it was passed a simple rev or commit. "git bisect skip <commit>" doesn't work any more, because <commit> is quoted but not properly unquoted. This patch fixes that and add tests cases to better check when it is passed commits and range of commits. While at it, this patch also properly quotes the non range arguments using the "sq" function. Signed-off-by: NChristian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
-