- 01 7月, 2005 6 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Nico pointed out that having verify_pack.c and verify-pack.c was confusing. Rename verify_pack.c to pack-check.c as suggested, and enhances the verification done quite a bit. - Built-in sha1_file unpacking knows that a base object of a deltified object _must_ be in the same pack, and takes advantage of that fact. - Earlier verify-pack command only checked the SHA1 sum for the entire pack file and did not look into its contents. It now checks everything idx file claims to have unpacks correctly. - It now has a hook to give more detailed information for objects contained in the pack under -v flag. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This teaches packed_delta_info() that it only needs to look at the type of the base object to figure out both type and size of a deltified object. This saves quite a many calls to inflate() when dealing with a deep delta chain. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This makes the receiver always send a full list of valid refs, which will allow us to do better packs, as well as handle creation of new refs. Eventually. Right now we just moved the matching and enabled it. So now you can do git-send-pack host:path branch1 branch2 to only send branches "branch1" and "branch2".
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
A "old ref" of all zeroes is considered a "don't care" ref, and allows us to say "write the new ref regardless of what the old ref contained (or even if it existed at all)". This allows (if git-send-pack were to do it) creating new refs, and fixing up old ones.
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This concludes this lesson. I've actually successfully sent an update using the git-send-pack command. Probably tons of work still to do, and nasty debugging, but it's now actually potentially useful.
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
After unpacking the object pack successfully, we go through the list of refs, and verify that they still contain their expected values. Then we replace them with the new ones.
-
- 30 6月, 2005 22 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Me tired.
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
We don't act on them yet, but we parse them.
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Right now it just shows which refs it picks up, and whether they are the same or changed on the remote end. Getting there..
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
It got turned off by mistake just because I had been doing debugging, and committed the Makefile that had other changes ...
-
由 Jon Seymour 提交于
This patch removes an unnecessary sort from the t6001 testcase. Sorts were previously necessary when testing non --merge-order cases because the output order wasn't entirely deterministic unless commit date was fixed. However, commit dates are now fixed, so the need for a sort has disappeared. So the sort has been removed. Signed-off-by: NJon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Jon Seymour 提交于
This fix fixes a t/t6001 test case break that was hidden by a bug in the test case infrastructure. Signed-off-by: NJon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Jon Seymour 提交于
Junio discovered a problem where an actual test case break was hidden because pipelines are not handled properly by the test infrastructure in t6001. This patch fixes the broken infrastructure (and demonstrates the break explicitly). A subsequent patch in this series will fix the test case so that it doesn't fail. Signed-off-by: NJon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Jon Seymour 提交于
This patch makes --merge-order produce the same list as git-rev-list without --merge-order specified. In particular, if the graph looks like this: A | B |/ C | D The both git-rev-list B ^A and git-rev-list --merge-order will produce B. The unit tests have been changed to reflect the fact that the prune points are now formally part of the start list that is used to perform the --merge-order sort. That is: git-rev-list --merge-order A ^D used to produce = A | C It now produces: ^ A | C Signed-off-by: NJon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Jon Seymour 提交于
Added a test case that shows that --merge-order doesn't produce the correct result in the following case. A | | B |/ C | D git-rev-list --merge-order A ^B should produce just A. Instead it produces BCD. A subsequent patch will fix this defect. Signed-off-by: NJon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Like git-receive-pack, this is only partway done.
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
It's not working yet, but it's at the point where I want to be able to track my changes. The theory of operation is that this is the "remote" side of a "git push". It can tell us what references the remote side has, receives out reference update commands and a pack-file, and can execute the unpacking command.
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
It makes gitk unhappy, and besides, non-merge-order doesn't complain, so why do it here..
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Now you can give git-rev-list tags, trees and blobs, and it will do the proper reachability for them all. Knock wood. Of course, you need the "--objects" flag to do anything but plain commits.
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
We want to be able to just say "give a difference between these objects", rather than limiting it to commits only. This isn't there yet, but it sets things up to be a bit easier.
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
It now always read from standard input and rejects non-flag arguments. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
It can no longer be as verbose, since it doesn't have a good way to resolve deltas (now that it is purely streaming, it cannot seek around to read the objects a delta is based on). But it can check that the thing unpacks cleanly at least as far as pack syntax goes - all the objects uncompress cleanly, and the pack has the right final SHA1.
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
I'd like to add back the "dry-run" thing, but it turns out that to do it well, I'd have to keep all the object data in memory (which is not acceptable). So I'll clean it up a bit and make it do as many checks as it can.
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Given a list of <pack>.idx files, this command validates the index file and the corresponding .pack file for consistency. This patch also uses the same validation mechanism in fsck-cache when the --full flag is used. During normal operation, sha1_file.c verifies that a given .idx file matches the .pack file by comparing the SHA1 checksum stored in .idx file and .pack file as a minimum sanity check. We may further want to check the pack signature and version when we map the pack, but that would be a separate patch. Earlier, errors to map a pack file was not flagged fatal but led to a random fatal error later. This version explicitly die()s when such an error is detected. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
If we prefer 0 as maxsize for diff_delta() to say "unlimited", let's be consistent about it. This patch also fixes type mismatch in a call to get_delta_hdr_size() from packed_delta_info(). Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
This is a wrap-up patch including all the cleanups I've done to the delta code and its usage. The most important change is the factorization of the delta header handling code. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 29 6月, 2005 12 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pointed out by Junio.
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This makes it match the new delta encoding, and admittedly makes the code easier to follow. This also updates the PACK file version to 2, since this (and the delta encoding change in the previous commit) are incompatible with the old format.
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
Since the delta data format is not tied to any actual git object anymore, now is the time to add a small improvement to the delta data header as it is been done for packed object header. This patch allows for reducing the delta header of about 2 bytes and makes for simpler code. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Deltas are useless by themselves and when you use them you need to get to their base objects. A base object should inherit recency from the most recent deltified object that is based on it and that is what this patch teaches git-pack-objects. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
It gets a bit more complicated to unpack in a streaming environment, but here it is. The rewrite is actually a lot cleaner in other ways, it's just a bit more subtle.
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The diff_delta() interface was extended to reject generating too big a delta while we were working on the packed GIT archive format. Take advantage of that when generating delta in the similarity estimator used in diffcore-rename.c Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Standalone unpack-objects command was not adjusted for header length encoding change when dealing with deltified entry. This fixes it. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
It's just easier to let git help out with the merge than it is to try to fix up the diffs.
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The fsck-cache complains if objects referred to by files in .git/refs/ or objects stored in files under .git/objects/??/ are not found as stand-alone SHA1 files (i.e. found in alternate object pools GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES or packed archives stored under .git/objects/pack). Although this is a good semantics to maintain consistency of a single .git/objects directory as a self contained set of objects, it sometimes is useful to consider it is OK as long as these "outside" objects are available. This commit introduces a new flag, --standalone, to git-fsck-cache. When it is not specified, connectivity checks and .git/refs pointer checks are taught that it is OK when expected objects do not exist under .git/objects/?? hierarchy but are available from an packed archive or in an alternate object pool. Another new flag, --full, makes git-fsck-cache to check not only the current GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY but also objects found in alternate object pools and packed GIT archives.a Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The commands git-fsck-cache and probably git-*-pull needs to have a way to enumerate objects contained in packed GIT archives and alternate object pools. This commit exposes the data structure used to keep track of them from sha1_file.c, and adds a couple of accessor interface functions for use by the enhanced git-fsck-cache command. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This was causing random segfaults, because use_packed_git() got confused by random garbage there. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The fsck-cache complains if objects referred to by files in .git/refs/ or objects stored in files under .git/objects/??/ are not found as stand-alone SHA1 files (i.e. found in alternate object pools GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES or packed archives stored under .git/objects/pack). Although this is a good semantics to maintain consistency of a single .git/objects directory as a self contained set of objects, it sometimes is useful to consider it is OK as long as these "outside" objects are available. This commit introduces a new flag, --standalone, to git-fsck-cache. When it is not specified, connectivity checks and .git/refs pointer checks are taught that it is OK when expected objects do not exist under .git/objects/?? hierarchy but are available from an packed archive or in an alternate object pool. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-