Some of the recent changes and shortcuts to the tests broke
things for people using older versions of svn:

t9104-git-svn-follow-parent.sh:
  v1.2.3 (from SuSE 10.0 as reported by riddochc on #git
  (thanks!)) required an extra 'svn up'.  I was also able to
  reproduce this with v1.1.4 (Debian Sarge).

lib-git-svn.sh:
  SVN::Repos bindings in versions up to and including 1.1.4
  (Sarge again) do not pass fs-config options to the underlying
  library.  BerkeleyDB repositories also seem completely broken
  on all my Sarge machines; so not using FSFS does not seem to
  be an option for most people.
Signed-off-by: NEric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Steven Grimm noticed that git-repack's verbosity is inconsistent
because pack-objects is chatty and prune-packed is not.  This
makes the latter a bit more chatty and gives -q option to
squelch it.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Pointed out by Paul Witt <paul.witt@oxix.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

While 'init-db' still is and probably will always remain a valid git
command for obvious backward compatibility reasons, it would be a good
idea to move shipped tools and docs to using 'init' instead.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Andy Parkins noticed that the error message some "whole tree"
oriented commands emit is stated misleadingly when they refused
to run from a subdirectory.

We could probably allow some of them to work from a subdirectory
but that is a semantic change that could have unintended side
effects, so let's start at first by rewording the error message
to be easier to read without doing anything else to be safe.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

It is not available in the outermost merge, and it is only
useful for debugging merge-recursive in the inner merges.

Sergey Vlasov noticed that the old code accesses an
uninitialized location.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

The code previously checked it's own name and called 'die' upon
an error.  However 'die' was not yet defined because git-sh-setup
had not been sourced yet.  Instead simply write the error message
to stderr and exit with an error as was originally desired.
Signed-off-by: NBob Proulx <bob@proulx.com>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Despite what the documentation claims, git-commit does not check commit
for suspicious lines: all hooks are disabled by default,
and the pre-comit hook could be changed to do something else.
Signed-off-by: NMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@mellanox.co.il>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

The "read_or_die()" function would silently NOT die for a partial read,
and since it was of type "void" it obviously couldn't even return the
partial number of bytes read.

IOW, it was totally broken. This hopefully fixes it up.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

With the new-and-improved write_in_full() semantics, where a partial write
simply always returns a real error (and always sets 'errno' when that
happens, including for the disk full case), a lot of the callers of
write_in_full() were just unnecessarily complex.

In particular, there's no reason to ever check for a zero length or
return: if the length was zero, we'll return zero, otherwise, if a disk
full resulted in the actual write() system call returning zero the
write_in_full() logic would have correctly turned that into a negative
return value, with 'errno' set to ENOSPC.

I really wish every "write_in_full()" user would just check against "<0"
now, but this fixes the nasty and stupid ones.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

When --stale-fix is not passed, the code did not initialize the
two commit objects properly.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Recently git.git itself encountered a situation on its master and
next branches where git-describe stopped reporting 'v1.5.0-rc0-gN'
and instead started reporting 'v1.4.4.4-gN'.  This appeared to be
a backward jump in version numbering.

  maint     o-------------------4
            \                    \
  master     o-o-o-o-o-o-o-5-o-C-o-W

The issue is that commit C in the diagram claims it is version
1.5.0, as the tag v1.5.0 is placed on commit 5.  Yet commit W
claims it is version 1.4.4.4 as the tag v1.5.0 has an older tag
date than the v1.4.4.4 tag.

As it turns out this situation is very common.  A bug fix applied
to maint and later merged into master occurs frequently enough that
it should Just Work Right(tm).

Rather than taking the first tag that gets found git-describe will
now generate a list of all possible tags and select the one which
has the most number of commits in common with HEAD (or whatever
revision the user requested the description of).

This rule is based on the principle shown in the diagram above.
There are a large number of commits on the primary development branch
'master' which do not appear in the 'maint' branch, and many of
these are already tagged as part of v1.5.0-rc0.  Additionally these
commits are not in v1.4.4.4, as they are part of the v1.5.0 release
still being developed.  The v1.5.0-rc0 tag is more descriptive of
W than v1.4.4.4 is, and therefore should be used.
Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

* jc/bare:
  Disallow working directory commands in a bare repository.
  git-fetch: allow updating the current branch in a bare repository.
  Introduce is_bare_repository() and core.bare configuration variable
  Move initialization of log_all_ref_updates

* ar/merge-recursive:
  merge-recursive: do not use on-file index when not needed.
  Speed-up recursive by flushing index only once for all entries

* jc/detached-head:
  git-checkout: handle local changes sanely when detaching HEAD
  git-checkout: safety check for detached HEAD checks existing refs
  git-checkout: fix branch name output from the command
  git-checkout: safety when coming back from the detached HEAD state.
  git-checkout: rewording comments regarding detached HEAD.
  git-checkout: do not warn detaching HEAD when it is already detached.
  Detached HEAD (experimental)
  git-branch: show detached HEAD
  git-status: show detached HEAD

If you do:

	$ /bin/rm foo
	$ git status

we used to say "git add ... to add content to commit".  But
suggsting "git add" to record the deletion of a file is simply
insane.

So this rewords various things:

 - The section header is the old "Changed but not updated",
   instead of "Changed but not added";

 - Suggestion is "git add ... to update what will be committed",
   instead of "... to add content to commit";

 - If there are removed paths, the above suggestion becomes "git
   add/rm ... to update what will be committed";

 - For untracked files, the suggestion is "git add ... to
   include in what will be committed".
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Often the user would do "/bin/rm foo" before telling git, but
then want to tell git about it.  "git rm foo" however would fail
because it cannot unlink(2) foo.

Treat ENOENT error return from unlink(2) as if a successful
removal happened.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Unfortunately, while {read,write}_in_full do take into account
zero-sized reads/writes; their die and whine variants do not.

I have a repository where there are zero-sized files in
the history that was triggering these things.
Signed-off-by: NEric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

This fixes another problem that Andy's case showed: git-fsck-objects
reports nonsensical results for corrupt objects.

There were actually two independent and confusing problems:

 - when we had a zero-sized file and used map_sha1_file, mmap() would
   return EINVAL, and git-fsck-objects would report that as an insane and
   confusing error. I don't know when this was introduced, it might have
   been there forever.

 - when "parse_object()" returned NULL, fsck would say "object not found",
   which can be very confusing, since obviously the object might "exist",
   it's just unparseable because it's totally corrupt.

So this just makes "xmmap()" return NULL for a zero-sized object (which is
a valid thing pointer, exactly the same way "malloc()" can return NULL for
a zero-sized allocation). That fixes the first problem (but we could have
fixed it in the caller too - I don't personally much care whichever way it
goes, but maybe somebody should check that the NO_MMAP case does
something sane in this case too?).

And the second problem is solved by just making the error message slightly
clearer - the failure to parse an object may be because it's missing or
corrupt, not necessarily because it's not "found".
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

These days, the command does a lot more than just initialise the
object database (such as setting default config-variables,
installing template hooks...), and "git init" is actually a more
sensible name nowadays.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

It is not used after getting written, and just is leaking every time
we write the index out.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

If the user tries to run a porcelainish command which requires
a working directory in a bare repository they may get unexpected
results which are difficult to predict and may differ from command
to command.

Instead we should detect that the current repository is a bare
repository and refuse to run the command there, as there is no
working directory associated with it.

[jc: updated Shawn's original somewhat -- bugs are mine.]
Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

This revamps the merge-recursive implementation following the
outline in:

	Message-ID: <7v8xgileza.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

There is no need to write out the index until the very end just
once from merge-recursive.  Also there is no need to write out
the resulting tree object for the simple case of merging with a
single merge base.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

The merge-recursive implementation in C inherited the invariant
that the on-file index file is written out and later read back
after any index operations and writing trees from the original
Python implementation.  But it was only because the original
implementation worked at the scripting level.

There is no need to write out the index file after handling
every path.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Since 98bf8a47 status would claim that
git-commit could be useful even if there are no changes except untracked files.

Since wt-status is already computing all the information needed go the whole
way and actually track the (non-)emptiness of all three sections separately,
unify the code, and provide useful messages for each individual case.

Thanks to Junio and Michael Loeffler for suggestions.
Signed-off-by: NJürgen Rühle <j-r@online.de>

* js/reflog:
  Sanitize for_each_reflog_ent()

On Cygwin, newly builtins are not recognized, because there exist both
the executable binaries (with .exe extension) _and_ the now-obsolete
scripts (without extension), but the script is executed.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

git-send-email sends out the message taken from format-patch
output without quoting nor encoding.  When copying the From:
line to form in-body From: field, it should not copy it
verbatim, because the From: for the header is quoted according
to RFC 2047 when not ASCII.

The original came from Jürgen Rühle, but I moved the
string munging into a separate function so that later other
people can tweak it more easily.  Bugs introduced during the
translation are mine.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Oops. Commit 515377ea missed one
file, git-init documentation.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Since c869753e, core.filemode is hardwired to false on Cygwin.
So this test had no chance to succeed, since an early commit
(changing just the filemode) failed, and therefore all subsequent
tests.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

The commit buffer (message of the commit) is not actually
used by the git-describe process.  We can save some memory
by not keeping it around.
Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

Originally from David Woodhouse, but also adjusts the callers of
mailinfo to the new default.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

It has '-n' to disable it just in case, but do not even bother
documenting it.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>