1. 13 4月, 2010 4 次提交
  2. 22 3月, 2010 4 次提交
  3. 08 3月, 2010 8 次提交
  4. 05 3月, 2010 2 次提交
  5. 01 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • C
      bisect: error out when passing bad path parameters · 8f69f72f
      Christian Couder 提交于
      As reported by Mark Lodato, "git bisect", when it was started with
      path parameters that match no commit was kind of working without
      taking account of path parameters and was reporting something like:
      
      Bisecting: -1 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps)
      
      It is more correct and safer to just error out in this case, before
      displaying the revisions left, so this patch does just that.
      
      Note that this bug is very old, it exists at least since v1.5.5.
      And it is possible to detect that case earlier in the bisect
      algorithm, but it is not clear that it would be an improvement to
      error out earlier, on the contrary it may change the behavior of
      "git rev-list --bisect-all" for example, which is currently correct.
      Signed-off-by: NChristian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      8f69f72f
  6. 26 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 21 2月, 2010 5 次提交
  8. 19 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 18 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  10. 17 2月, 2010 2 次提交
    • J
      Merge branch 'maint-1.6.5' into maint-1.6.6 · eb0bcd0f
      Junio C Hamano 提交于
      * maint-1.6.5:
        dwim_ref: fix dangling symref warning
        stash pop: remove 'apply' options during 'drop' invocation
        diff: make sure --output=/bad/path is caught
      eb0bcd0f
    • J
      dwim_ref: fix dangling symref warning · 003c6abd
      Jeff King 提交于
      If we encounter a symref that is dangling, in most cases we will warn
      about it. The one exception is a dangling HEAD, as that indicates a
      branch yet to be born.
      
      However, the check in dwim_ref was not quite right. If we were fed
      something like "HEAD^0" we would try to resolve "HEAD", see that it is
      dangling, and then check whether the _original_ string we got was
      "HEAD" (which it wasn't in this case). And that makes no sense; the
      dangling thing we found was not "HEAD^0" but rather "HEAD".
      
      Fixing this squelches a scary warning from "submodule summary HEAD" (and
      consequently "git status" with status.submodulesummary set) in an empty
      repo, as the submodule script calls "git rev-parse -q --verify HEAD^0".
      Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      003c6abd
  11. 16 2月, 2010 3 次提交
  12. 14 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 13 2月, 2010 3 次提交
  14. 12 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 11 2月, 2010 3 次提交