1. 03 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 16 4月, 2013 14 次提交
    • K
      dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't scan the work tree twice · 0aaf62b6
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      'git-status --ignored' still scans the work tree twice to collect
      untracked and ignored files, respectively.
      
      fill_directory / read_directory already supports collecting untracked and
      ignored files in a single directory scan. However, the DIR_COLLECT_IGNORED
      flag to enable this has some git-add specific side-effects (e.g. it
      doesn't recurse into ignored directories, so listing ignored files with
      --untracked=all doesn't work).
      
      The DIR_SHOW_IGNORED flag doesn't list untracked files and returns ignored
      files in dir_struct.entries[] (instead of dir_struct.ignored[] as
      DIR_COLLECT_IGNORED). DIR_SHOW_IGNORED is used all throughout git.
      
      We don't want to break the existing API, so lets introduce a new flag
      DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO that lists untracked as well as ignored files similar
      to DIR_COLLECT_FILES, but will recurse into sub-directories based on the
      other flags as DIR_SHOW_IGNORED does.
      
      In dir.c::read_directory_recursive, add ignored files to either
      dir_struct.entries[] or dir_struct.ignored[] based on the flags. Also move
      the DIR_COLLECT_IGNORED case here so that filling result lists is in a
      common place.
      
      In wt-status.c::wt_status_collect_untracked, use the new flag and read
      results from dir_struct.ignored[]. Remove the extra fill_directory call.
      
      builtin/check-ignore.c doesn't call fill_directory, setting the git-add
      specific DIR_COLLECT_IGNORED flag has no effect here. Remove for clarity.
      
      Update API documentation to reflect the changes.
      
      Performance: with this patch, 'git-status --ignored' is typically as fast
      as 'git-status'.
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      0aaf62b6
    • K
      dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't scan the work tree three times · defd7c7b
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      'git-status --ignored' recursively scans directories up to three times:
      
       1. To collect untracked files.
      
       2. To collect ignored files.
      
       3. When collecting ignored files, to check that an untracked directory
          that potentially contains ignored files doesn't also contain untracked
          files (i.e. isn't already listed as untracked).
      
      Let's get rid of case 3 first.
      
      Currently, read_directory_recursive returns a boolean whether a directory
      contains the requested files or not (actually, it returns the number of
      files, but no caller actually needs that), and DIR_SHOW_IGNORED specifies
      what we're looking for.
      
      To be able to test for both untracked and ignored files in a single scan,
      we need to return a bit more info, and the result must be independent of
      the DIR_SHOW_IGNORED flag.
      
      Reuse the path_treatment enum as return value of read_directory_recursive.
      Split path_handled in two separate values path_excluded and path_untracked
      that don't change their meaning with the DIR_SHOW_IGNORED flag. We don't
      need an extra value path_untracked_and_excluded, as directories with both
      untracked and ignored files should be listed as untracked.
      
      Rename path_ignored to path_none for clarity (i.e. "don't treat that path"
      in contrast to "the path is ignored and should be treated according to
      DIR_SHOW_IGNORED").
      
      Replace enum directory_treatment with path_treatment. That's just another
      enum with the same meaning, no need to translate back and forth.
      
      In treat_directory, get rid of the extra read_directory_recursive call and
      all the DIR_SHOW_IGNORED-specific code.
      
      In read_directory_recursive, decide whether to dir_add_name path_excluded
      or path_untracked paths based on the DIR_SHOW_IGNORED flag.
      
      The return value of read_directory_recursive is the maximum path_treatment
      of all files and sub-directories. In the check_only case, abort when we've
      reached the most significant value (path_untracked).
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      defd7c7b
    • K
      dir.c: git-status: avoid is_excluded checks for tracked files · 8aaf8d77
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      Checking if a file is in the index is much faster (hashtable lookup) than
      checking if the file is excluded (linear search over exclude patterns).
      
      Skip is_excluded checks for files: move the cache_name_exists check from
      treat_file to treat_one_path and return early if the file is tracked.
      
      This can safely be done as all other code paths also return path_ignored
      for tracked files, and dir_add_ignored skips tracked files as well.
      
      There's just one line left in treat_file, so move this to treat_one_path
      as well.
      
      Here's some performance data for git-status from the linux and WebKit
      repos (best of 10 runs on a Debian Linux on SSD, core.preloadIndex=true):
      
             |    status      | status --ignored
             | linux | WebKit | linux | WebKit
      -------+-------+--------+-------+---------
      before | 0.218 |  1.583 | 0.321 |  2.579
      after  | 0.156 |  0.988 | 0.202 |  1.279
      gain   | 1.397 |  1.602 | 1.589 |  2.016
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      8aaf8d77
    • K
    • K
      dir.c: unify is_excluded and is_path_excluded APIs · 95c6f271
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      The is_excluded and is_path_excluded APIs are very similar, except for a
      few noteworthy differences:
      
      is_excluded doesn't handle ignored directories, results for paths within
      ignored directories are incorrect. This is probably based on the premise
      that recursive directory scans should stop at ignored directories, which
      is no longer true (in certain cases, read_directory_recursive currently
      calls is_excluded *and* is_path_excluded to get correct ignored state).
      
      is_excluded caches parsed .gitignore files of the last directory in struct
      dir_struct. If the directory changes, it finds a common parent directory
      and is very careful to drop only as much state as necessary. On the other
      hand, is_excluded will also read and parse .gitignore files in already
      ignored directories, which are completely irrelevant.
      
      is_path_excluded correctly handles ignored directories by checking if any
      component in the path is excluded. As it uses is_excluded internally, this
      unfortunately forces is_excluded to drop and re-read all .gitignore files,
      as there is no common parent directory for the root dir.
      
      is_path_excluded tracks state in a separate struct path_exclude_check,
      which is essentially a wrapper of dir_struct with two more fields. However,
      as is_path_excluded also modifies dir_struct, it is not possible to e.g.
      use multiple path_exclude_check structures with the same dir_struct in
      parallel. The additional structure just unnecessarily complicates the API.
      
      Teach is_excluded / prep_exclude about ignored directories: whenever
      entering a new directory, first check if the entire directory is excluded.
      Remember the excluded state in dir_struct. Don't traverse into already
      ignored directories (i.e. don't read irrelevant .gitignore files).
      
      Directories could also be excluded by exclude patterns specified on the
      command line or .git/info/exclude, so we cannot simply skip prep_exclude
      entirely if there's no .gitignore file name (dir_struct.exclude_per_dir).
      Move this check to just before actually reading the file.
      
      is_path_excluded is now equivalent to is_excluded, so we can simply
      redirect to it (the public API is cleaned up in the next patch).
      
      The performance impact of the additional ignored check per directory is
      hardly noticeable when reading directories recursively (e.g. 'git status').
      However, performance of git commands using the is_path_excluded API (e.g.
      'git ls-files --cached --ignored --exclude-standard') is greatly improved
      as this no longer re-reads .gitignore files on each call.
      
      Here's some performance data from the linux and WebKit repos (best of 10
      runs on a Debian Linux on SSD, core.preloadIndex=true):
      
             | ls-files -ci   |    status      | status --ignored
             | linux | WebKit | linux | WebKit | linux | WebKit
      -------+-------+--------+-------+--------+-------+---------
      before | 0.506 |  6.539 | 0.212 |  1.555 | 0.323 |  2.541
      after  | 0.080 |  1.191 | 0.218 |  1.583 | 0.321 |  2.579
      gain   | 6.325 |  5.490 | 0.972 |  0.982 | 1.006 |  0.985
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      95c6f271
    • K
      dir.c: move prep_exclude · 6cd5c582
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      Move prep_exclude in preparation for the next patch.
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      6cd5c582
    • K
    • K
      dir.c: git-clean -d -X: don't delete tracked directories · 5bd8e2d8
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      The notion of "ignored tracked" directories introduced in 721ac4ed "dir.c:
      Make git-status --ignored more consistent" has a few unwanted side effects:
      
       - git-clean -d -X: deletes ignored tracked directories. git-clean should
         never delete tracked content.
      
       - git-ls-files --ignored --other --directory: lists ignored tracked
         directories instead of "other" directories.
      
       - git-status --ignored: lists ignored tracked directories while contained
         files may be listed as modified. Paths listed by git-status should be
         disjoint (except in long format where a path may be listed in both the
         staged and unstaged section).
      
      Additionally, the current behaviour violates documentation in gitignore(5)
      ("Specifies intentionally *untracked* files to ignore") and Documentation/
      technical/api-directory-listing.txt ("DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES: Include
      a directory that is *not tracked*.").
      
      In dir.c::treat_directory, remove the special handling of ignored tracked
      directories, so that the DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES flag only affects
      "other" (i.e. untracked) directories. In dir.c::dir_add_name, check that
      added paths are untracked even if DIR_SHOW_IGNORED is set.
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      5bd8e2d8
    • K
      dir.c: make 'git-status --ignored' work within leading directories · be8a84c5
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      'git-status --ignored path/' doesn't list ignored files and directories
      within 'path' if some component of 'path' is classified as untracked.
      
      Disable the DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES flag while traversing leading
      directories. This prevents treat_leading_path() with DIR_SHOW_IGNORED flag
      from aborting at the top level untracked directory.
      
      As a side effect, this also eliminates a recursive directory scan per
      leading directory level, as treat_directory() can no longer call
      read_directory_recursive() when called from treat_leading_path().
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      be8a84c5
    • K
      dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list empty directories as ignored · c94ab010
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      'git-status --ignored' lists empty untracked directories as ignored, even
      though they don't have any ignored files.
      
      When checking if a directory is already listed as untracked (i.e. shouldn't
      be listed as ignored as well), don't assume that the directory has only
      ignored files if it doesn't have untracked files, as the directory may be
      empty.
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      c94ab010
    • K
      dir.c: git-ls-files --directories: don't hide empty directories · 184d2a8e
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      'git-ls-files --ignored --directories' hides empty directories even though
      --no-empty-directory was not specified.
      
      Treat the DIR_HIDE_EMPTY_DIRECTORIES flag independently from
      DIR_SHOW_IGNORED to make all git-ls-files options work as expected.
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      184d2a8e
    • K
      dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list empty ignored directories · 0104c9e7
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      'git-status --ignored' lists ignored tracked directories without any
      ignored files if a tracked file happens to match an exclude pattern.
      
      Always exclude tracked files.
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      0104c9e7
    • K
      dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list files in ignored directories · 289ff559
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      'git-status --ignored' lists both the ignored directory and the ignored
      files if the files are in a tracked sub directory.
      
      When recursing into sub directories in read_directory_recursive, pass on
      the check_only parameter so that we don't accidentally add the files.
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      289ff559
    • K
      dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't drop ignored directories · 560bb7a7
      Karsten Blees 提交于
      'git-status --ignored' drops ignored directories if they contain untracked
      files in an untracked sub directory.
      
      Fix it by getting exact (recursive) excluded status in treat_directory.
      Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      560bb7a7
  3. 15 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 13 4月, 2013 23 次提交
  5. 12 4月, 2013 1 次提交