1. 22 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      graph API: fix bug in graph_is_interesting() · beb5af43
      Adam Simpkins 提交于
      Previously, graph_is_interesting() did not behave quite the same way as
      the code in get_revision().  As a result, it would sometimes think
      commits were uninteresting, even though get_revision() would return
      them.  This resulted in incorrect lines in the graph output.
      
      This change creates a get_commit_action() function, which
      graph_is_interesting() and simplify_commit() both now use to determine
      if a commit will be shown.  It is identical to the old simplify_commit()
      behavior, except that it never calls rewrite_parents().
      
      This problem was reported by Santi Béjar.  The following command
      would exhibit the problem before, but now works correctly:
      
        git log --graph --simplify-by-decoration --oneline v1.6.3.3
      
      Previously git graph did not display the output for this command
      correctly between f29ac4f1 and 66996ecc, among other places.
      Signed-off-by: NAdam Simpkins <simpkins@facebook.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      beb5af43
  2. 19 8月, 2009 2 次提交
  3. 17 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      docs: describe impact of repack on "clone -s" · 13354f53
      Jeff King 提交于
      The effects of repacking on a repository with alternates are a bit
      subtle. The two main things users will want are:
      
        1. Not to waste disk space by accidentally copying objects which could
           be shared.
      
        2. Copying all objects explicitly to break the dependency on the source
           repo.
      
      This patch describes both under the "clone -s" documentation. It makes
      sense to put it there rather than in git-repack.txt for both cases.
      
      For (1), we are warning the user who is using "clone -s" about what _not_
      to do, so we need to get their attention when reading about "clone -s".
      
      For (2), we are telling them how git-repack can be used to accomplish a
      task, but until they know that git-repack is the right tool, they have no
      reason to look at the repack documentation.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      13354f53
  4. 13 8月, 2009 6 次提交
  5. 11 8月, 2009 2 次提交
  6. 10 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 08 8月, 2009 6 次提交
  8. 06 8月, 2009 4 次提交
  9. 05 8月, 2009 2 次提交
  10. 31 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 29 7月, 2009 7 次提交
  12. 27 7月, 2009 4 次提交
  13. 26 7月, 2009 3 次提交