- 29 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
A bit of history in chronological order, the newest at bottom: - 80ccaa78 (upload-pack: Move the revision walker into a separate function.) do_rev_list was introduced with create_full_pack argument - 21edd3f1 (upload-pack: Run rev-list in an asynchronous function.) do_rev_list was now called by start_async, create_full_pack was passed by rev_list.data - f0cea83f (Shift object enumeration out of upload-pack) rev_list.data was now zero permanently. Creating full pack was done by passing --all to pack-objects - ae6a5609 (run-command: support custom fd-set in async) rev_list.data = 0 was found out redudant and got rid of. Get rid of the code as well, for less headache while reading do_rev_list. [jc: noticed by Elijah Newren] Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Erik Faye-Lund 提交于
This patch adds the possibility to supply a set of non-0 file descriptors for async process communication instead of the default-created pipe. Additionally, we now support bi-directional communiction with the async procedure, by giving the async function both read and write file descriptors. To retain compatiblity and similar "API feel" with start_command, we require start_async callers to set .out = -1 to get a readable file descriptor. If either of .in or .out is 0, we supply no file descriptor to the async process. [sp: Note: Erik started this patch, and a huge bulk of it is his work. All bugs were introduced later by Shawn.] Signed-off-by: NErik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 11 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This hook runs after "git fetch" in the repository the objects are fetched from as the user who fetched, and has security implications. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
In theory it is possible for sideband channel #2 to be delayed if pack data is quick to come up for sideband channel #1. And because data for channel #2 is read only 128 bytes at a time while pack data is read 8192 bytes at a time, it is possible for many pack blocks to be sent to the client before the progress message fifo is emptied, making the situation even worse. This would result in totally garbled progress display on the client's console as local progress gets mixed with partial remote progress lines. Let's prevent such situations by giving transmission priority to progress messages over pack data at all times. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 05 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
When --stateless-rpc is passed as a command line parameter to upload-pack or receive-pack the programs now assume they may perform only a single read-write cycle with stdin and stdout. This fits with the HTTP POST request processing model where a program may read the request, write a response, and must exit. When --advertise-refs is passed as a command line parameter only the initial ref advertisement is output, and the program exits immediately. This fits with the HTTP GET request model, where no request content is received but a response must be produced. HTTP headers and/or environment are not processed here, but instead are assumed to be handled by the program invoking either service backend. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 31 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
When multi_ack_detailed is enabled the ACK continue messages returned by the remote upload-pack are broken out to describe the different states within the peer. This permits the client to better understand the server's in-memory state. The fetch-pack/upload-pack protocol now looks like: NAK --------------------------------- Always sent in response to "done" if there was no common base selected from the "have" lines (or no have lines were sent). * no multi_ack or multi_ack_detailed: Sent when the client has sent a pkt-line flush ("0000") and the server has not yet found a common base object. * either multi_ack or multi_ack_detailed: Always sent in response to a pkt-line flush. ACK %s ----------------------------------- * no multi_ack or multi_ack_detailed: Sent in response to "have" when the object exists on the remote side and is therefore an object in common between the peers. The argument is the SHA-1 of the common object. * either multi_ack or multi_ack_detailed: Sent in response to "done" if there are common objects. The argument is the last SHA-1 determined to be common. ACK %s continue ----------------------------------- * multi_ack only: Sent in response to "have". The remote side wants the client to consider this object as common, and immediately stop transmitting additional "have" lines for objects that are reachable from it. The reason the client should stop is not given, but is one of the two cases below available under multi_ack_detailed. ACK %s common ----------------------------------- * multi_ack_detailed only: Sent in response to "have". Both sides have this object. Like with "ACK %s continue" above the client should stop sending have lines reachable for objects from the argument. ACK %s ready ----------------------------------- * multi_ack_detailed only: Sent in response to "have". The client should stop transmitting objects which are reachable from the argument, and send "done" soon to get the objects. If the remote side has the specified object, it should first send an "ACK %s common" message prior to sending "ACK %s ready". Clients may still submit additional "have" lines if there are more side branches for the client to explore that might be added to the common set and reduce the number of objects to transfer. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 13 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jim Meyering 提交于
There were several unchecked use of fdopen(); replace them with xfdopen() that checks and dies. Signed-off-by: NJim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jim Meyering 提交于
In 2d14d65c (Use a clearer style to issue commands to remote helpers, 2009-09-03) I happened to notice two changes like this: - write_in_full(helper->in, "list\n", 5); + + strbuf_addstr(&buf, "list\n"); + write_in_full(helper->in, buf.buf, buf.len); + strbuf_reset(&buf); IMHO, it would be better to define a new function, static inline ssize_t write_str_in_full(int fd, const char *str) { return write_in_full(fd, str, strlen(str)); } and then use it like this: - strbuf_addstr(&buf, "list\n"); - write_in_full(helper->in, buf.buf, buf.len); - strbuf_reset(&buf); + write_str_in_full(helper->in, "list\n"); Thus not requiring the added allocation, and still avoiding the maintenance risk of literal string lengths. These days, compilers are good enough that strlen("literal") imposes no run-time cost. Transformed via this: perl -pi -e \ 's/write_in_full\((.*?), (".*?"), \d+\)/write_str_in_full($1, $2)/'\ $(git grep -l 'write_in_full.*"') Signed-off-by: NJim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
First of all, I can't find any reason why thin pack generation is explicitly disabled when dealing with a shallow repository. The possible delta base objects are collected from the edge commits which are always obtained through history walking with the same shallow refs as the client, Therefore the client is always going to have those base objects available. So let's remove that restriction. Then we can make shallow repository deepening much more efficient by using the remote's unshallowed commits as edge commits to get preferred base objects for thin pack generation. On git.git, this makes the data transfer for the deepening of a shallow repository from depth 1 to depth 2 around 134 KB instead of 3.68 MB. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Brian Gianforcaro 提交于
The majority of code in core git appears to use a single space after if/for/while. This is an attempt to bring more code to this standard. These are entirely cosmetic changes. Signed-off-by: NBrian Gianforcaro <b.gianfo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
A request to clone the repository does not give any "have" but asks for all the refs we offer with "want". When a request does not ask to clone the repository fully, but asks to fetch some refs into an empty repository, it will not give any "have" but its "want" won't ask for all the refs we offer. If we suppose (and I would say this is a rather big if) that it makes sense to distinguish these two cases, a hook cannot reliably do this alone. The hook can detect lack of "have" and bunch of "want", but there is no direct way to tell if the other end asked for all refs we offered, or merely most of them. Between the time we talked with the other end and the time the hook got called, we may have acquired more refs or lost some refs in the repository by concurrent operations. Given that we plan to introduce selective advertisement of refs with a protocol extension, it would become even more difficult for hooks to guess between these two cases. This adds "kind [clone|fetch]" to hook's input, as a stable interface to allow the hooks to tell these cases apart. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
After upload-pack successfully finishes its operation, post-upload-pack hook can be called for logging purposes. The hook is passed various pieces of information, one per line, from its standard input. Currently the following items can be fed to the hook, but more types of information may be added in the future: want SHA-1:: 40-byte hexadecimal object name the client asked to include in the resulting pack. Can occur one or more times in the input. have SHA-1:: 40-byte hexadecimal object name the client asked to exclude from the resulting pack, claiming to have them already. Can occur zero or more times in the input. time float:: Number of seconds spent for creating the packfile. size decimal:: Size of the resulting packfile in bytes. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
upload-pack runs pack-objects, which generates progress indicator output on its stderr. If the client requests a sideband, this indicator is sent to the client; but if it did not, then the progress is written to upload-pack's own stderr. If upload-pack is itself run from git-daemon (and if the client did not request a sideband) the progress indicator never reaches the client and it need not be generated in the first place. With this patch the progress indicator is suppressed in this situation. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nick Edelen 提交于
Offload object enumeration in upload-pack to pack-objects, but fall back on internal revision walker for shallow interaction. Aside from architecturally making more sense, this also leaves the door open for pack-objects to employ a revision cache mechanism. Test t5530 updated in order to explicitly check both enumeration methods. Signed-off-by: NNick Edelen <sirnot@gmail.com> Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 01 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christian Couder 提交于
This new "read_replace_refs" global variable is set to 1 by default, so that replace refs are used by default. But reachability traversal and packing commands ("cmd_fsck", "cmd_prune", "cmd_pack_objects", "upload_pack", "cmd_unpack_objects") set it to 0, as they must work with the original DAG. Signed-off-by: NChristian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 13 4月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
In particular, pushing the "path_name()" call _into_ the show() function would seem to allow - more clarity into who "owns" the name (ie now when we free the name in the show_object callback, it's because we generated it ourselves by calling path_name()) - not calling path_name() at all, either because we don't care about the name in the first place, or because we are actually happy walking the linked list of "struct name_path *" and the last component. Now, I didn't do that latter optimization, because it would require some more coding, but especially looking at "builtin-pack-objects.c", we really don't even want the whole pathname, we really would be better off with the list of path components. Why? We use that name for two things: - add_preferred_base_object(), which actually _wants_ to traverse the path, and now does it by looking for '/' characters! - for 'name_hash()', which only cares about the last 16 characters of a name, so again, generating the full name seems to be just unnecessary work. Anyway, so I didn't look any closer at those things, but it did convince me that the "show_object()" calling convention was crazy, and we're actually better off doing _less_ in list-objects.c, and giving people access to the internal data structures so that they can decide whether they want to generate a path-name or not. This patch does that, and then for people who did use the name (even if they might do something more clever in the future), it just does the straightforward "name = path_name(path, component); .. free(name);" thing. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Here's a less trivial thing, and slightly more dubious one. I was looking at that "struct object_array objects", and wondering why we do that. I have honestly totally forgotten. Why not just call the "show()" function as we encounter the objects? Rather than add the objects to the object_array, and then at the very end going through the array and doing a 'show' on all, just do things more incrementally. Now, there are possible downsides to this: - the "buffer using object_array" _can_ in theory result in at least better I-cache usage (two tight loops rather than one more spread out one). I don't think this is a real issue, but in theory.. - this _does_ change the order of the objects printed. Instead of doing a "process_tree(revs, commit->tree, &objects, NULL, "");" in the loop over the commits (which puts all the root trees _first_ in the object list, this patch just adds them to the list of pending objects, and then we'll traverse them in that order (and thus show each root tree object together with the objects we discover under it) I _think_ the new ordering actually makes more sense, but the object ordering is actually a subtle thing when it comes to packing efficiency, so any change in order is going to have implications for packing. Good or bad, I dunno. - There may be some reason why we did it that odd way with the object array, that I have simply forgotten. Anyway, now that we don't buffer up the objects before showing them that may actually result in lower memory usage during that whole traverse_commit_list() phase. This is seriously not very deeply tested. It makes sense to me, it seems to pass all the tests, it looks ok, but... Does anybody remember why we did that "object_array" thing? It used to be an "object_list" a long long time ago, but got changed into the array due to better memory usage patterns (those linked lists of obejcts are horrible from a memory allocation standpoint). But I wonder why we didn't do this back then. Maybe there's a reason for it. Or maybe there _used_ to be a reason, and no longer is. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 08 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christian Couder 提交于
The goal of this patch is to get rid of the "static struct rev_info revs" static variable in "builtin-rev-list.c". To do that, we need to pass the revs to the "show_commit" function in "builtin-rev-list.c" and this in turn means that the "traverse_commit_list" function in "list-objects.c" must be passed functions pointers to functions with 2 parameters instead of one. So we have to change all the callers and all the functions passed to "traverse_commit_list". Anyway this makes the code more clean and more generic, so it should be a good thing in the long run. Signed-off-by: NChristian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 08 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Kramer 提交于
These weren't used outside and can be safely moved Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 05 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
Certain remote commands, when asked to do something in a particular directory that was not actually a git repository, would say "unable to chdir or not a git archive". The "chdir" bit is an unnecessary detail, and the term "git archive" is much less common these days than "git repository". So let's switch them all to: fatal: '%s' does not appear to be a git repository Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Acked-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 05 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Potashev 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Potashev <aspotashev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 26 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steffen Prohaska 提交于
Programs that use git_config need to find the global configuration. When runtime prefix computation is enabled, this requires that git_extract_argv0_path() is called early in the program's main(). This commit adds the necessary calls. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de> Acked-by: NJohannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This is a mechanical conversion of all '*.c' files with: s/((?:die|error|warning)\("git)-(\S+:)/$1 $2/; The result was manually inspected and no false positive was found. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 26 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
We will need the command invocation path in system_path(). This path was passed to setup_path(), but system_path() can be called earlier, for example via: main commit_pager_choice setup_pager git_config git_etc_gitconfig system_path Therefore, we introduce git_set_argv0_path() and call it as soon as possible. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 26 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
In upload-pack we must explicitly close the output channel of rev-list. (On Unix, the channel is closed automatically because process that runs rev-list terminates.) Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
-
- 05 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
The new protocol extension "include-tag" allows the client side of the connection (fetch-pack) to request that the server side of the native git protocol (upload-pack / pack-objects) use --include-tag as it prepares the packfile, thus ensuring that an annotated tag object will be included in the resulting packfile if the object it refers to was also included into the packfile. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 03 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
To facilitate testing and verification of the requests sent by git-fetch to the remote side we permit logging the received packet lines to the file descriptor specified in GIT_DEBUG_SEND_PACK has been set. Special start and end lines are included to indicate the start and end of each connection. $ GIT_DEBUG_SEND_PACK=3 git fetch 3>UPLOAD_LOG $ cat UPLOAD_LOG #S want 8e10cf4e007ad7e003463c30c34b1050b039db78 multi_ack side-band-64k thin-pack ofs-delta want ddfa4a33562179aca1ace2bcc662244a17d0b503 #E #S want 3253df4d1cf6fb138b52b1938473bcfec1483223 multi_ack side-band-64k thin-pack ofs-delta #E >From the above trace the first connection opened by git-fetch was to download two refs (with values 8e and dd) and the second connection was opened to automatically follow an annotated tag (32). Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 26 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Koegler 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMartin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Koegler 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMartin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 18 2月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Koegler 提交于
A failure in prepare_revision_walk can be caused by a not parseable object. Signed-off-by: NMartin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Martin Koegler 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMartin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
Since git-upload-pack has to spawn git-pack-objects, it has to make sure that the latter can be found in the PATH. Without this patch an attempt to clone or pull via ssh from a server fails if the git tools are not in the standard PATH on the server even though git clone or git pull were invoked with --upload-pack=/path/to/git-upload-pack. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end. This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the following observations: - If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself, closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes (which indicate success) and terminates successfully. - If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully. Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list and signals failure to the remote end. - If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE. upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the remote end. - If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list. The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly. This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of an explicit waitpid(2) call. The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the indentation of a large part of the inner loop. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 21 10月, 2007 3 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
This gets rid of an explicit fork(). Since upload-pack has to coordinate two processes (rev-list and pack-objects), we cannot use the normal finish_async(), but have to monitor the process explicitly. Hence, there are no changes at this front. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
This allows us later to use start_async() with this function, and at the same time is a nice cleanup that makes a long function (create_pack_file()) shorter. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
This gets rid of an explicit fork/exec. Since upload-pack has to coordinate two processes (rev-list and pack-objects), we cannot use the normal finish_command(), but have to monitor the processes explicitly. Hence, the waitpid() call remains. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 08 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 07 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This uses "git-apply --whitespace=strip" to fix whitespace errors that have crept in to our source files over time. There are a few files that need to have trailing whitespaces (most notably, test vectors). The results still passes the test, and build result in Documentation/ area is unchanged. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 29 3月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
Right now, we don't close the read end of the pipe when git-upload-pack runs git-pack-object, so we hang forever (why don't we get SIGALRM?) instead of dying with SIGPIPE if the latter dies, which seems to be the norm if the client disconnects. Thanks to Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> for pointing out where this close() needed to go. This patch has been tested on kernel.org for several weeks and appear to resolve the problem of git-upload-pack processes hanging around forever. Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> (cherry picked from commit 465b3518)
-
- 28 3月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
Right now, we don't close the read end of the pipe when git-upload-pack runs git-pack-object, so we hang forever (why don't we get SIGALRM?) instead of dying with SIGPIPE if the latter dies, which seems to be the norm if the client disconnects. Thanks to Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> for pointing out where this close() needed to go. This patch has been tested on kernel.org for several weeks and appear to resolve the problem of git-upload-pack processes hanging around forever. Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-