- 16 7月, 2013 10 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
This patch is essentially no-op. It helps catching new use of this field though. This field is introduced as an intermediate step for the pathspec conversion and will be removed eventually. At this stage no more access sites should be introduced. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
match_pathspec_depth was created to replace match_pathspec (see 61cf2820 (pathspec: add match_pathspec_depth() - 2010-12-15). It took more than two years, but the replacement finally happens :-) Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
While at there, move free_pathspec() to pathspec.c Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
The code now takes advantage of nowildcard_len field. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
GUARD_PATHSPEC() marks pathspec-sensitive code, basically all those that touch anything in 'struct pathspec' except fields "nr" and "original". GUARD_PATHSPEC() is not supposed to fail. It's mainly to help the designers catch unsupported codepaths. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
match_pathspec_depth() and tree_entry_interesting() check max_depth field in order to support "git grep --max-depth". The feature activation is tied to "recursive" field, which led to some unwanted activation, e.g. 5c8eeb83 (diff-index: enable recursive pathspec matching in unpack_trees - 2012-01-15). This patch decouples the activation from "recursive" field, puts it in "magic" field instead. This makes sure that only "git grep" can activate this feature. And because parse_pathspec knows when the feature is not used, it does not need to sort pathspec (required for max_depth to work correctly). A small win for non-grep cases. Even though a new magic flag is introduced, no magic syntax is. The magic can be only enabled by parse_pathspec() caller. We might someday want to support ":(maxdepth:10)src." It all depends on actual use cases. max_depth feature cannot be enabled via init_pathspec() anymore. But that's ok because init_pathspec() is on its way to /dev/null. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
We usually use pathspec_item's match field for pathspec error reporting. However "match" (or "raw") does not show the magic part, which will play more important role later on. Preserve exact user input for reporting. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Currently to fill a struct pathspec, we do: const char **paths; paths = get_pathspec(prefix, argv); ... init_pathspec(&pathspec, paths); "paths" can only carry bare strings, which loses information from command line arguments such as pathspec magic or the prefix part's length for each argument. parse_pathspec() is introduced to combine the two calls into one. The plan is gradually replace all get_pathspec() and init_pathspec() with parse_pathspec(). get_pathspec() now becomes a thin wrapper of parse_pathspec(). parse_pathspec() allows the caller to reject the pathspec magics that it does not support. When a new pathspec magic is introduced, we can enable it per command after making sure that all underlying code has no problem with the new magic. "flags" parameter is currently unused. But it would allow callers to pass certain instructions to parse_pathspec, for example forcing literal pathspec when no magic is used. With the introduction of parse_pathspec, there are now two functions that can initialize struct pathspec: init_pathspec and parse_pathspec. Any semantic changes in struct pathspec must be reflected in both functions. init_pathspec() will be phased out in favor of parse_pathspec(). Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When the working tree walker encounters a directory, it asks the function treat_directory() if it should descend into it, show it as an untracked directory, or do something else. When the directory is the top of the submodule working tree, we used to say "That is an untracked directory", which was bogus. It is an entity that is tracked in the index of the repository we are looking at, and that is not to be descended into it. Return path_none, not path_untracked, to report that. The existing case that path_untracked is returned for a newly discovered submodule that is not tracked in the index (this only happens when DIR_NO_GITLINKS option is not used) is unchanged, but that is exactly because the submodule is not tracked in the index. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
As of 95c6f271 "dir.c: unify is_excluded and is_path_excluded APIs", the is_excluded API no longer recurses into directories that match an ignore pattern, and returns the directory's ignored state for all contained paths. This is OK for normal ignore patterns, i.e. ignoring a directory affects the entire contents recursively. Unfortunately, this also "works" for negated ignore patterns ('!dir'), i.e. the entire contents is "not-ignored" recursively, regardless of ignore patterns that match the contents directly. In prep_exclude, skip recursing into a directory only if it is really ignored (i.e. the ignore pattern is not negated). Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Tested-by: NØystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NDuy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 16 4月, 2013 14 次提交
-
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
'git-status --ignored' still scans the work tree twice to collect untracked and ignored files, respectively. fill_directory / read_directory already supports collecting untracked and ignored files in a single directory scan. However, the DIR_COLLECT_IGNORED flag to enable this has some git-add specific side-effects (e.g. it doesn't recurse into ignored directories, so listing ignored files with --untracked=all doesn't work). The DIR_SHOW_IGNORED flag doesn't list untracked files and returns ignored files in dir_struct.entries[] (instead of dir_struct.ignored[] as DIR_COLLECT_IGNORED). DIR_SHOW_IGNORED is used all throughout git. We don't want to break the existing API, so lets introduce a new flag DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO that lists untracked as well as ignored files similar to DIR_COLLECT_FILES, but will recurse into sub-directories based on the other flags as DIR_SHOW_IGNORED does. In dir.c::read_directory_recursive, add ignored files to either dir_struct.entries[] or dir_struct.ignored[] based on the flags. Also move the DIR_COLLECT_IGNORED case here so that filling result lists is in a common place. In wt-status.c::wt_status_collect_untracked, use the new flag and read results from dir_struct.ignored[]. Remove the extra fill_directory call. builtin/check-ignore.c doesn't call fill_directory, setting the git-add specific DIR_COLLECT_IGNORED flag has no effect here. Remove for clarity. Update API documentation to reflect the changes. Performance: with this patch, 'git-status --ignored' is typically as fast as 'git-status'. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
'git-status --ignored' recursively scans directories up to three times: 1. To collect untracked files. 2. To collect ignored files. 3. When collecting ignored files, to check that an untracked directory that potentially contains ignored files doesn't also contain untracked files (i.e. isn't already listed as untracked). Let's get rid of case 3 first. Currently, read_directory_recursive returns a boolean whether a directory contains the requested files or not (actually, it returns the number of files, but no caller actually needs that), and DIR_SHOW_IGNORED specifies what we're looking for. To be able to test for both untracked and ignored files in a single scan, we need to return a bit more info, and the result must be independent of the DIR_SHOW_IGNORED flag. Reuse the path_treatment enum as return value of read_directory_recursive. Split path_handled in two separate values path_excluded and path_untracked that don't change their meaning with the DIR_SHOW_IGNORED flag. We don't need an extra value path_untracked_and_excluded, as directories with both untracked and ignored files should be listed as untracked. Rename path_ignored to path_none for clarity (i.e. "don't treat that path" in contrast to "the path is ignored and should be treated according to DIR_SHOW_IGNORED"). Replace enum directory_treatment with path_treatment. That's just another enum with the same meaning, no need to translate back and forth. In treat_directory, get rid of the extra read_directory_recursive call and all the DIR_SHOW_IGNORED-specific code. In read_directory_recursive, decide whether to dir_add_name path_excluded or path_untracked paths based on the DIR_SHOW_IGNORED flag. The return value of read_directory_recursive is the maximum path_treatment of all files and sub-directories. In the check_only case, abort when we've reached the most significant value (path_untracked). Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
Checking if a file is in the index is much faster (hashtable lookup) than checking if the file is excluded (linear search over exclude patterns). Skip is_excluded checks for files: move the cache_name_exists check from treat_file to treat_one_path and return early if the file is tracked. This can safely be done as all other code paths also return path_ignored for tracked files, and dir_add_ignored skips tracked files as well. There's just one line left in treat_file, so move this to treat_one_path as well. Here's some performance data for git-status from the linux and WebKit repos (best of 10 runs on a Debian Linux on SSD, core.preloadIndex=true): | status | status --ignored | linux | WebKit | linux | WebKit -------+-------+--------+-------+--------- before | 0.218 | 1.583 | 0.321 | 2.579 after | 0.156 | 0.988 | 0.202 | 1.279 gain | 1.397 | 1.602 | 1.589 | 2.016 Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
The is_excluded and is_path_excluded APIs are very similar, except for a few noteworthy differences: is_excluded doesn't handle ignored directories, results for paths within ignored directories are incorrect. This is probably based on the premise that recursive directory scans should stop at ignored directories, which is no longer true (in certain cases, read_directory_recursive currently calls is_excluded *and* is_path_excluded to get correct ignored state). is_excluded caches parsed .gitignore files of the last directory in struct dir_struct. If the directory changes, it finds a common parent directory and is very careful to drop only as much state as necessary. On the other hand, is_excluded will also read and parse .gitignore files in already ignored directories, which are completely irrelevant. is_path_excluded correctly handles ignored directories by checking if any component in the path is excluded. As it uses is_excluded internally, this unfortunately forces is_excluded to drop and re-read all .gitignore files, as there is no common parent directory for the root dir. is_path_excluded tracks state in a separate struct path_exclude_check, which is essentially a wrapper of dir_struct with two more fields. However, as is_path_excluded also modifies dir_struct, it is not possible to e.g. use multiple path_exclude_check structures with the same dir_struct in parallel. The additional structure just unnecessarily complicates the API. Teach is_excluded / prep_exclude about ignored directories: whenever entering a new directory, first check if the entire directory is excluded. Remember the excluded state in dir_struct. Don't traverse into already ignored directories (i.e. don't read irrelevant .gitignore files). Directories could also be excluded by exclude patterns specified on the command line or .git/info/exclude, so we cannot simply skip prep_exclude entirely if there's no .gitignore file name (dir_struct.exclude_per_dir). Move this check to just before actually reading the file. is_path_excluded is now equivalent to is_excluded, so we can simply redirect to it (the public API is cleaned up in the next patch). The performance impact of the additional ignored check per directory is hardly noticeable when reading directories recursively (e.g. 'git status'). However, performance of git commands using the is_path_excluded API (e.g. 'git ls-files --cached --ignored --exclude-standard') is greatly improved as this no longer re-reads .gitignore files on each call. Here's some performance data from the linux and WebKit repos (best of 10 runs on a Debian Linux on SSD, core.preloadIndex=true): | ls-files -ci | status | status --ignored | linux | WebKit | linux | WebKit | linux | WebKit -------+-------+--------+-------+--------+-------+--------- before | 0.506 | 6.539 | 0.212 | 1.555 | 0.323 | 2.541 after | 0.080 | 1.191 | 0.218 | 1.583 | 0.321 | 2.579 gain | 6.325 | 5.490 | 0.972 | 0.982 | 1.006 | 0.985 Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
Move prep_exclude in preparation for the next patch. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
The notion of "ignored tracked" directories introduced in 721ac4ed "dir.c: Make git-status --ignored more consistent" has a few unwanted side effects: - git-clean -d -X: deletes ignored tracked directories. git-clean should never delete tracked content. - git-ls-files --ignored --other --directory: lists ignored tracked directories instead of "other" directories. - git-status --ignored: lists ignored tracked directories while contained files may be listed as modified. Paths listed by git-status should be disjoint (except in long format where a path may be listed in both the staged and unstaged section). Additionally, the current behaviour violates documentation in gitignore(5) ("Specifies intentionally *untracked* files to ignore") and Documentation/ technical/api-directory-listing.txt ("DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES: Include a directory that is *not tracked*."). In dir.c::treat_directory, remove the special handling of ignored tracked directories, so that the DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES flag only affects "other" (i.e. untracked) directories. In dir.c::dir_add_name, check that added paths are untracked even if DIR_SHOW_IGNORED is set. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
'git-status --ignored path/' doesn't list ignored files and directories within 'path' if some component of 'path' is classified as untracked. Disable the DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES flag while traversing leading directories. This prevents treat_leading_path() with DIR_SHOW_IGNORED flag from aborting at the top level untracked directory. As a side effect, this also eliminates a recursive directory scan per leading directory level, as treat_directory() can no longer call read_directory_recursive() when called from treat_leading_path(). Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
'git-status --ignored' lists empty untracked directories as ignored, even though they don't have any ignored files. When checking if a directory is already listed as untracked (i.e. shouldn't be listed as ignored as well), don't assume that the directory has only ignored files if it doesn't have untracked files, as the directory may be empty. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
'git-ls-files --ignored --directories' hides empty directories even though --no-empty-directory was not specified. Treat the DIR_HIDE_EMPTY_DIRECTORIES flag independently from DIR_SHOW_IGNORED to make all git-ls-files options work as expected. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
'git-status --ignored' lists ignored tracked directories without any ignored files if a tracked file happens to match an exclude pattern. Always exclude tracked files. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
'git-status --ignored' lists both the ignored directory and the ignored files if the files are in a tracked sub directory. When recursing into sub directories in read_directory_recursive, pass on the check_only parameter so that we don't accidentally add the files. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
'git-status --ignored' drops ignored directories if they contain untracked files in an untracked sub directory. Fix it by getting exact (recursive) excluded status in treat_directory. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 15 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Nieder 提交于
The changes v1.7.12.1~2^2~4 (config: warn on inaccessible files, 2012-08-21) and v1.8.1.1~22^2~2 (config: treat user and xdg config permission problems as errors, 2012-10-13) were intended to prevent important configuration (think "[transfer] fsckobjects") from being ignored when the configuration is unintentionally unreadable (for example with EIO on a flaky filesystem, or with ENOMEM due to a DoS attack). Usually ~/.gitconfig and ~/.config/git are readable by the current user, and if they aren't then it would be easy to fix those permissions, so the damage from adding this check should have been minimal. Unfortunately the access() check often trips when git is being run as a server. A daemon (such as inetd or git-daemon) starts as "root", creates a listening socket, and then drops privileges, meaning that when git commands are invoked they cannot access $HOME and die with fatal: unable to access '/root/.config/git/config': Permission denied Any patch to fix this would have one of three problems: 1. We annoy sysadmins who need to take an extra step to handle HOME when dropping privileges (the current behavior, or any other proposal that they have to opt into). 2. We annoy sysadmins who want to set HOME when dropping privileges, either by making what they want to do impossible, or making them set an extra variable or option to accomplish what used to work (e.g., a patch to git-daemon to set HOME when --user is passed). 3. We loosen the check, so some cases which might be noteworthy are not caught. This patch is of type (3). Treat user and xdg configuration that are inaccessible due to permissions (EACCES) as though no user configuration was provided at all. An alternative method would be to check if $HOME is readable, but that would not help in cases where the user who dropped privileges had a globally readable HOME with only .config or .gitconfig being private. This does not change the behavior when /etc/gitconfig or .git/config is unreadable (since those are more serious configuration errors), nor when ~/.gitconfig or ~/.config/git is unreadable due to problems other than permissions. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Improved-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
If we used to have an index entry "d/f", but "d" has been replaced by a non-directory entry, the user may still want to run "git rm" to delete the stale index entry. They could use "git rm --cached" to just touch the index, but "git rm" should also work: we explicitly try to handle the case that the file has already been removed from the working tree. However, because unlinking "d/f" in this case will not yield ENOENT, but rather ENOTDIR, we do not notice that the file is already gone. Instead, we report it as an error. The simple solution is to treat ENOTDIR in this case exactly like ENOENT; all we want to know is whether the file is already gone, and if a leading path is no longer a directory, then by definition the sub-path is gone. Reported-by: Njpinheiro <7jpinheiro@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 29 3月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
This function takes two counted strings: a <pattern, patternlen> pair and a <pathname, pathlen> pair. But we end up feeding the result to fnmatch, which expects NUL-terminated strings. We can fix this by calling the fnmatch_icase_mem function, which handles re-allocating into a NUL-terminated string if necessary. While we're at it, we can avoid even calling fnmatch in some cases. In addition to patternlen, we get "prefix", the size of the pattern that contains no wildcard characters. We do a straight match of the prefix part first, and then use fnmatch to cover the rest. But if there are no wildcards in the pattern at all, we do not even need to call fnmatch; we would simply be comparing two empty strings. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
If we receive a pattern that starts with "/", we shift it forward to avoid looking at the "/" part. Since the prefix and patternlen parameters are counts of what is in the pattern, we must decrement them as we increment the pointer. We remembered to handle prefix, but not patternlen. This didn't cause any bugs, though, because the patternlen parameter is not actually used. Since it will be used in future patches, let's correct this oversight. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The function takes two counted strings (<basename, basenamelen> and <pattern, patternlen>) as parameters, together with prefix (the length of the prefix in pattern that is to be matched literally without globbing against the basename) and EXC_* flags that tells it how to match the pattern against the basename. However, it did not pay attention to the length of these counted strings. Update them to do the following: * When the entire pattern is to be matched literally, the pattern matches the basename only when the lengths of them are the same, and they match up to that length. * When the pattern is "*" followed by a string to be matched literally, make sure that the basenamelen is equal or longer than the "literal" part of the pattern, and the tail of the basename string matches that literal part. * Otherwise, use the new fnmatch_icase_mem helper to make sure we only lookmake sure we use only look at the counted part of the strings. Because these counted strings are full strings most of the time, we check for termination to avoid unnecessary allocation. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 08 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Antoine Pelisse 提交于
When enumerating paths that are ignored, paths the index knows about are not included in the result. The "index knows about" check is done by consulting the name hash, not the actual contents of the index: - When core.ignorecase is false, directory names are not in the name hash, and ignored ones are shown as ignored (directories can never be tracked anyway). - When core.ignorecase is true, however, the name hash keeps track of the names of directories, in order to detect additions of the paths under different cases. This causes ignored directories to be mistakenly excluded when enumerating ignored paths. Stop excluding directories that are in the name hash when looking for ignored files in dir_add_name(); the names that are actually in the index are excluded much earlier in the callchain in treat_file(), so this fix will not make them mistakenly identified as ignored. Signed-off-by: NAntoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Spiers 提交于
Fix a grammatical issue in the description of these functions, and make it more obvious how and why seen[] can be reused across multiple invocations. Signed-off-by: NAdam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Adam Spiers 提交于
By the end of a directory traversal, a dir_struct instance will typically contains pointers to various data structures on the heap. clear_directory() provides a convenient way to reclaim that memory. Signed-off-by: NAdam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Adam Spiers 提交于
For exclude patterns read in from files, the filename is stored in the exclude list, and the originating line number is stored in the individual exclude (counting starting at 1). For exclude patterns provided on the command line, a string describing the source of the patterns is stored in the exclude list, and the sequence number assigned to each exclude pattern is negative, with counting starting at -1. So for example the 2nd pattern provided via --exclude would be numbered -2. This allows any future consumers of that data to easily distinguish between exclude patterns from files vs. from the CLI. Signed-off-by: NAdam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Adam Spiers 提交于
Previously each exclude_list could potentially contain patterns from multiple sources. For example dir->exclude_list[EXC_FILE] would typically contain patterns from .git/info/exclude and core.excludesfile, and dir->exclude_list[EXC_DIRS] could contain patterns from multiple per-directory .gitignore files during directory traversal (i.e. when dir->exclude_stack was more than one item deep). We split these composite exclude_lists up into three groups of exclude_lists (EXC_CMDL / EXC_DIRS / EXC_FILE as before), so that each exclude_list now contains patterns from a single source. This will allow us to cleanly track the origin of each pattern simply by adding a src field to struct exclude_list, rather than to struct exclude, which would make memory management of the source string tricky in the EXC_DIRS case where its contents are dynamically generated. Similarly, by moving the filebuf member from struct exclude_stack to struct exclude_list, it allows us to track and subsequently free memory buffers allocated during the parsing of all exclude files, rather than only tracking buffers allocated for files in the EXC_DIRS group. Signed-off-by: NAdam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 1月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Antoine Pelisse 提交于
The current behavior of git-status is inconsistent and misleading. Especially when used with --untracked-files=all option: - files ignored in untracked directories will be missing from status output. - untracked files in committed yet ignored directories are also missing. - with --untracked-files=normal, untracked directories that contains only ignored files are dropped too. Make the behavior more consistent across all possible use cases: - "--ignored --untracked-files=normal" doesn't show each specific files but top directory. It instead shows untracked directories that only contains ignored files, and ignored tracked directories with untracked files. - "--ignored --untracked-files=all" shows all ignored files, either because it's in an ignored directory (tracked or untracked), or because the file is explicitly ignored. Signed-off-by: NAntoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
So far, wildmatch() has always honoured directory boundary and there was no way to turn it off. Make it behave more like fnmatch() by requiring all callers that want the FNM_PATHNAME behaviour to pass that in the equivalent flag WM_PATHNAME. Callers that do not specify WM_PATHNAME will get wildcards like ? and * in their patterns matched against '/', just like not passing FNM_PATHNAME to fnmatch(). Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
- All exported constants now have a prefix WM_ - Do not rely on FNM_* constants, use the WM_ counterparts - Remove TRUE and FALSE to follow Git's coding style - While at it, turn flags type from int to unsigned int - Add an (unused yet) argument to carry extra information so that we don't have to change the prototype again later when we need to pass other stuff to wildmatch Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 29 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Spiers 提交于
It is clearer to use a 'clear_' prefix for functions which empty and deallocate the contents of a data structure without freeing the structure itself, and a 'free_' prefix for functions which also free the structure itself. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/206128Signed-off-by: NAdam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-