- 09 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The command line parser of "git push" for "--tags", "--delete", and "--thin" options still used outdated OPT_BOOLEAN. Because these options do not give escalating levels when given multiple times, they should use OPT_BOOL. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ramkumar Ramachandra 提交于
With this change, the output of the push (with push.default set to current) changes subtly from: $ git push ... * [new branch] HEAD -> push-current-head to: $ git push ... * [new branch] push-current-head -> push-current-head This patch was written with a different motivation. There is a problem unique to push.default = current: # on branch push-current-head $ git push # on another terminal $ git checkout master # return to the first terminal # the push tried to push master! This happens because the 'git checkout' on the second terminal races with the 'git push' on the first terminal. Although this patch does not solve the core problem (there is still no guarantee that 'git push' on the first terminal will resolve HEAD before 'git checkout' changes HEAD on the second), it works in practice. Signed-off-by: NRamkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Ramkumar Ramachandra 提交于
Setting push.default to current adds the refspec "HEAD" for the transport layer to handle. If "HEAD" doesn't resolve to a branch (and since no refspec rhs is specified), the push fails after some time with a cryptic error message: $ git push error: unable to push to unqualified destination: HEAD The destination refspec neither matches an existing ref on the remote nor begins with refs/, and we are unable to guess a prefix based on the source ref. error: failed to push some refs to 'git@github.com:artagnon/git' Fail early with a nicer error message: $ git push fatal: You are not currently on a branch. To push the history leading to the current (detached HEAD) state now, use git push ram HEAD:<name-of-remote-branch> Just like in the upstream and simple cases. Signed-off-by: NRamkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Ramkumar Ramachandra 提交于
With push.default set to upstream or simple, and a detached HEAD, git push prints the following error: $ git push fatal: You are not currently on a branch. To push the history leading to the current (detached HEAD) state now, use git push ram HEAD:<name-of-remote-branch> This error is not unique to upstream or simple: current cannot push with a detached HEAD either. So, factor out the error string in preparation for using it in current. Signed-off-by: NRamkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 03 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ramkumar Ramachandra 提交于
Currently, do_push() in push.c calls remote_get(), which gets the configured remote for fetching and pushing. Replace this call with a call to pushremote_get() instead, a new function that will return the remote configured specifically for pushing. This function tries to work with the string pushremote_name, before falling back to the codepath of remote_get(). This patch has no visible impact, but serves to enable future patches to introduce configuration variables to set pushremote_name. For example, you can now do the following in handle_config(): if (!strcmp(key, "remote.pushdefault")) git_config_string(&pushremote_name, key, value); Then, pushes will automatically go to the remote specified by remote.pushdefault. Signed-off-by: NRamkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The new option "--follow-tags" tells "git push" to push annotated tags that are missing from the other side and that can be reached by the history that is otherwise pushed out. For example, if you are using the "simple", "current", or "upstream" push, you would ordinarily push the history leading to the commit at your current HEAD and nothing else. With this option, you would also push all annotated tags that can be reached from that commit to the other side. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Now that "already exists" errors are given only when a push tries to update an existing ref in refs/tags/ hierarchy, we can say "the tag", instead of "the destination reference", and that is far easier to understand. Pointed out by Chris Rorvick. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When we push to update an existing ref, if: * the object at the tip of the remote is not a commit; or * the object we are pushing is not a commit, it won't be correct to suggest to fetch, integrate and push again, as the old and new objects will not "merge". We should explain that the push must be forced when there is a non-committish object is involved in such a case. If we do not have the current object at the tip of the remote, we do not even know that object, when fetched, is something that can be merged. In such a case, suggesting to pull first just like non-fast-forward case may not be technically correct, but in practice, most such failures are seen when you try to push your work to a branch without knowing that somebody else already pushed to update the same branch since you forked, so "pull first" would work as a suggestion most of the time. And if the object at the tip is not a commit, "pull first" will fail, without making any permanent damage. As a side effect, it also makes the error message the user will get during the next "push" attempt easier to understand, now the user is aware that a non-commit object is involved. In these cases, the current code already rejects such a push on the client end, but we used the same error and advice messages as the ones used when rejecting a non-fast-forward push, i.e. pull from there and integrate before pushing again. Introduce new rejection reasons and reword the messages appropriately. [jc: with help by Peff on message details] Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Schrab 提交于
Add support for a pre-push hook which can be used to determine if the set of refs to be pushed is suitable for the target repository. The hook is run with two arguments specifying the name and location of the destination repository. Information about what is to be pushed is provided by sending lines of the following form to the hook's standard input: <local ref> SP <local sha1> SP <remote ref> SP <remote sha1> LF If the hook exits with a non-zero status, the push will be aborted. This will allow the script to determine if the push is acceptable based on the target repository and branch(es), the commits which are to be pushed, and even the source branches in some cases. Signed-off-by: NAaron Schrab <aaron@schrab.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Rorvick 提交于
Add 'advice.pushAlreadyExists' option to disable the advice shown when an update is rejected for a reference that is not allowed to update at all (verses those that are allowed to fast-forward.) Signed-off-by: NChris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Chris Rorvick 提交于
The 'pushNonFastForward' advice config can be used to squelch several instances of push-related advice. Rename it to 'pushUpdateRejected' to cover other reject scenarios that are unrelated to fast-forwarding. Retain the old name for compatibility. Signed-off-by: NChris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Rorvick 提交于
References are allowed to update from one commit-ish to another if the former is an ancestor of the latter. This behavior is oriented to branches which are expected to move with commits. Tag references are expected to be static in a repository, though, thus an update to something under refs/tags/ should be rejected unless the update is forced. Signed-off-by: NChris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Chris Rorvick 提交于
Advising the user to fetch and merge only makes sense if the rejected reference is a branch. If none of the rejections are for branches, just tell the user the reference already exists. Signed-off-by: NChris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Chris Rorvick 提交于
Pass all rejection reasons back from transport_push(). The logic is simpler and more flexible with regard to providing useful feedback. Signed-off-by: NChris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 21 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthieu Moy 提交于
In preparation for flipping the default to the "simple" mode from the "matching" mode that is the historical default, start warning users when they rely on unconfigured "git push" to default to the "matching" mode. Also, advertise for 'simple' where 'current' and 'upstream' are advised. Signed-off-by: NMatthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 25 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthieu Moy 提交于
When calling "git push" without argument, we want to allow Git to do something simple to explain and safe. push.default=matching is unsafe when used to push to shared repositories, and hard to explain to beginners in some contexts. It is debatable whether 'upstream' or 'current' is the safest or the easiest to explain, so introduce a new mode called 'simple' that is the intersection of them: push to the upstream branch, but only if it has the same name remotely. If not, give an error that suggests the right command to push explicitely to 'upstream' or 'current'. A question is whether to allow pushing when no upstream is configured. An argument in favor of allowing the push is that it makes the new mode work in more cases. On the other hand, refusing to push when no upstream is configured encourages the user to set the upstream, which will be beneficial on the next pull. Lacking better argument, we chose to deny the push, because it will be easier to change in the future if someone shows us wrong. Original-patch-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NMatthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The user can say "git push" without specifying any refspec. When using the "upstream" semantics via the push.default configuration, the user wants to update the "upstream" branch of the current branch, which is the branch at a remote repository the current branch is set to integrate with, with this command. However, there are cases that such a "git push" that uses the "upstream" semantics does not make sense: - The current branch does not have branch.$name.remote configured. By definition, "git push" that does not name where to push to will not know where to push to. The user may explicitly say "git push $there", but again, by definition, no branch at repository $there is set to integrate with the current branch in this case and we wouldn't know which remote branch to update. - The current branch does have branch.$name.remote configured, but it does not specify branch.$name.merge that names what branch at the remote this branch integrates with. "git push" knows where to push in this case (or the user may explicitly say "git push $remote" to tell us where to push), but we do not know which remote branch to update. - The current branch does have its remote and upstream branch configured, but the user said "git push $there", where $there is not the remote named by "branch.$name.remote". By definition, no branch at repository $there is set to integrate with the current branch in this case, and this push is not meant to update any branch at the remote repository $there. The first two cases were already checked correctly, but the third case was not checked and we ended up updating the branch named branch.$name.merge at repository $there, which was totally bogus. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 31 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heiko Voigt 提交于
When using this option git will search for all submodules that have changed in the revisions to be send. It will then try to push the currently checked out branch of each submodule. This helps when a user has finished working on a change which involves submodules and just wants to push everything in one go. Signed-off-by: NFredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com> Mentored-by: NJens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Mentored-by: NHeiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 20 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christopher Tiwald 提交于
Pushing a non-fast-forward update to a remote repository will result in an error, but the hint text doesn't provide the correct resolution in every case. Give better resolution advice in three push scenarios: 1) If you push your current branch and it triggers a non-fast-forward error, you should merge remote changes with 'git pull' before pushing again. 2) If you push to a shared repository others push to, and your local tracking branches are not kept up to date, the 'matching refs' default will generate non-fast-forward errors on outdated branches. If this is your workflow, the 'matching refs' default is not for you. Consider setting the 'push.default' configuration variable to 'current' or 'upstream' to ensure only your current branch is pushed. 3) If you explicitly specify a ref that is not your current branch or push matching branches with ':', you will generate a non-fast-forward error if any pushed branch tip is out of date. You should checkout the offending branch and merge remote changes before pushing again. Teach transport.c to recognize these scenarios and configure push.c to hint for them. If 'git push's default behavior changes or we discover more scenarios, extension is easy. Standardize on the advice API and add three new advice variables, 'pushNonFFCurrent', 'pushNonFFDefault', and 'pushNonFFMatching'. Setting any of these to 'false' will disable their affiliated advice. Setting 'pushNonFastForward' to false will disable all three, thus preserving the config option for users who already set it, but guaranteeing new users won't disable push advice accidentally. Based-on-patch-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NChristopher Tiwald <christiwald@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Felipe Contreras 提交于
When pushing groups of refs to a remote, there is no simple way to remove old refs that still exist at the remote that is no longer updated from us. This will allow us to remove such refs from the remote. With this change, running this command $ git push --prune remote refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/laptop/* removes refs/remotes/laptop/foo from the remote if we do not have branch "foo" locally anymore. Signed-off-by: NFelipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Clemens Buchacher 提交于
By default, progress output is disabled if stderr is not a terminal. The --progress option can be used to force progress output anyways. Conversely, --no-progress does not force progress output. In particular, if stderr is a terminal, progress output is enabled. This is unintuitive. Change --no-progress to force output off. Signed-off-by: NClemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
6f48d39f (clone: delay cloning until after remote HEAD checking - 2012-01-16) allows us to perform some checks on remote refs before the actual cloning happens. But not all transport types support this. Remote helper with "import" capability will not return complete ref information until fetch is performed and therefore the clone cannot be delayed. foreign_vcs field in struct remote was used to detect this kind of transport and save the result. This is a mistake because foreign_vcs is designed to override url-based transport detection. As a result, if the same "struct transport *" object is used on many different urls and one of them attached remote transport, the following urls will be mistakenly attached to the same transport. This fault is worked around by dad0b3d8 (push: do not let configured foreign-vcs permanently clobbered - 2012-01-23) To fix this, detect incomplete refs from transport_get_remote_refs() by SHA-1. Incomplete ones must have null SHA-1 (*). Then revert changes related to foreign_cvs field in 6f48d39f and dad0b3d8. A good thing from this change is that cloning smart http transport can also be delayed. Earlier it falls into the same category "remote transport, no delay". (*) Theoretically if one of the remote refs happens to have null SHA-1, it will trigger false alarm and the clone will not be delayed. But that chance may be too small for us to pay attention to. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 24 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Recently, 6f48d39f (clone: delay cloning until after remote HEAD checking, 2012-01-16) tried to record if a remote helper needs to be called after parsing the remote when transport_get() is called, by overwriting the field meant to store the configured remote helper name in the remote structure. This is OK when a remote represents a single remote repository, but fails miserably when pushing to locations with multiple URLs, like this: $ cat .git/config [remote "origin"] url = https://code.google.com/p/git-htmldocs/ url = github.com:gitster/git-htmldocs.git push = refs/heads/master:refs/heads/master $ git push The second url that is supposed to use the git-over-ssh transport mistakenly use https:// and fails with: error: Couldn't resolve host 'github.com:gitster' while accessing github.com:gitster/git-htmldocs.git/info/refs fatal: HTTP request failed The right solution would probably be to dedicate a separate field to store the detected external helper to be used, which is valid only during a single use of transport until it is disconnected, instead of overwriting foreign_vcs field, but in the meantime, this band-aid should suffice. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 21 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fredrik Gustafsson 提交于
When working with submodules it is easy to forget to push a submodule to the server but pushing a super-project that contains a commit for that submodule. The result is that the superproject points at a submodule commit that is not available on the server. This adds the option --recurse-submodules=check to push. When using this option git will check that all submodule commits that are about to be pushed are present on a remote of the submodule. To be able to use a combined diff, disabling a diff callback has been removed from combined-diff.c. Signed-off-by: NFredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com> Mentored-by: NJens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Mentored-by: NHeiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 3月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 提交于
Gettextize the "To prevent you from losing history" message. A test in lib-httpd.sh and another in t5541-http-push.sh explicitly checked for this message. Change them to skip under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease. Signed-off-by: NÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 提交于
Signed-off-by: NÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 09 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
This shows a trace of all packets coming in or out of a given program. This can help with debugging object negotiation or other protocol issues. To keep the code changes simple, we operate at the lowest level, meaning we don't necessarily understand what's in the packets. The one exception is a packet starting with "PACK", which causes us to skip that packet and turn off tracing (since the gigantic pack data will not be interesting to read, at least not in the trace format). We show both written and read packets. In the local case, this may mean you will see packets twice (written by the sender and read by the receiver). However, for cases where the other end is remote, this allows you to see the full conversation. Packet tracing can be enabled with GIT_TRACE_PACKET=<foo>, where <foo> takes the same arguments as GIT_TRACE. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 03 3月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matthieu Moy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMatthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Matthieu Moy 提交于
A common scenario is to create a new branch and push it (checkout -b && push [--set-upstream]). In this case, the user was getting "The current branch %s has no upstream branch.", which doesn't help much. Provide the user a command to push the current branch. To avoid the situation in the future, suggest --set-upstream. While we're there, also improve the error message in the "detached HEAD" case. We mention explicitly "detached HEAD" since this is the keyword to look for in documentations. Signed-off-by: NMatthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 17 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Herland 提交于
Users are sometimes confused with two different types of "tracking" behavior in Git: "remote-tracking" branches (e.g. refs/remotes/*/*) versus the merge/rebase relationship between a local branch and its @{upstream} (controlled by branch.foo.remote and branch.foo.merge config settings). When the push.default is set to 'tracking', it specifies that a branch should be pushed to its @{upstream} branch. In other words, setting push.default to 'tracking' applies only to the latter of the above two types of "tracking" behavior. In order to make this more understandable to the user, we rename the push.default == 'tracking' option to push.default == 'upstream'. push.default == 'tracking' is left as a deprecated synonym for 'upstream'. Signed-off-by: NJohan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 13 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthieu Moy 提交于
The message remains fuzzy to include "git pull", "git pull --rebase" and others, but directs the user to the simplest solution in the vast majority of cases. Signed-off-by: NMatthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 03 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jared Hance 提交于
Creating a variable nr here to use throughout the function only to change refspec_nr to nr at the end, having not used refspec_nr the entire time, is rather pointless. Instead, simply increment refspec_nr. While at it, use ALLOC_GROW() instead of xrealloc(). Signed-off-by: NJared Hance <jaredhance@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This shrinks the top-level directory a bit, and makes it much more pleasant to use auto-completion on the thing. Instead of [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab> Display all 180 possibilities? (y or n) [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-sh builtin-shortlog.c builtin-show-branch.c builtin-show-ref.c builtin-shortlog.o builtin-show-branch.o builtin-show-ref.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shor<tab> builtin-shortlog.c builtin-shortlog.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shortlog.c you get [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab> [type] builtin/ builtin.h [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin [auto-completes to] [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sh<tab> [type] shortlog.c shortlog.o show-branch.c show-branch.o show-ref.c show-ref.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sho [auto-completes to] [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shor<tab> [type] shortlog.c shortlog.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shortlog.c which doesn't seem all that different, but not having that annoying break in "Display all 180 possibilities?" is quite a relief. NOTE! If you do this in a clean tree (no object files etc), or using an editor that has auto-completion rules that ignores '*.o' files, you won't see that annoying 'Display all 180 possibilities?' message - it will just show the choices instead. I think bash has some cut-off around 100 choices or something. So the reason I see this is that I'm using an odd editory, and thus don't have the rules to cut down on auto-completion. But you can simulate that by using 'ls' instead, or something similar. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 30 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
Caught by valgrind in t5516. Reading the code shows we malloc enough for our string, but not trailing NUL. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilari Liusvaara 提交于
Frequent complaint is lack of easy way to set up upstream (tracking) references for git pull to work as part of push command. So add switch --set-upstream (-u) to do just that. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NIlari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 12 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthieu Moy 提交于
The error message in case of non-fast forward points to 'git push --help', but used to talk about a section 'non-fast-forward', while the actual section name is 'Note about fast-forwards'. Signed-off-by: NMatthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 31 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Krüger 提交于
Refspecs without a source side have been reported as confusing by many. As an alternative, this adds support for commands like: git push origin --delete somebranch git push origin --delete tag sometag Specifically, --delete will prepend a colon to all colon-less refspecs given on the command line, and will refuse to accept refspecs with colons to prevent undue confusion. Signed-off-by: NJan Krüger <jk@jk.gs> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tay Ray Chuan 提交于
Move the failed push message to before transport_disconnect() so that it doesn't access transport->url after transport has been free()'d (in transport_disconnect()). Additionally, make the failed push message more accurate by moving it before transport_disconnect(), so that it doesn't report errors due to a failed disconnect. Signed-off-by: NTay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-