- 08 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 brian m. carlson 提交于
Convert struct cache_entry to use struct object_id by applying the following semantic patch and the object_id transforms from contrib, plus the actual change to the struct: @@ struct cache_entry E1; @@ - E1.sha1 + E1.oid.hash @@ struct cache_entry *E1; @@ - E1->sha1 + E1->oid.hash Signed-off-by: Nbrian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 7月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
If a subdirectory contains nothing but i-t-a entries, we generate an empty tree object and add it to its parent tree. Which is wrong. Such a subdirectory should not be added. Note that this has a cascading effect. If subdir 'a/b/c' contains nothing but i-t-a entries, we ignore it. But then if 'a/b' contains only (the non-existing) 'a/b/c', then we should ignore 'a/b' while building 'a' too. And it goes all the way up to top directory. Noticed-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Commit 3cf773e4 (cache-tree: fix writing cache-tree when CE_REMOVE is present - 2012-12-16) skips i-t-a entries when building trees objects from the index. Unfortunately it may skip too much. The code in question checks if an entry is an i-t-a one, then no tree entry will be written. But it does not take into account that directories can also be written with the same code. Suppose we have this in the index. a-file subdir/file1 subdir/file2 subdir/file3 the-last-file We write an entry for a-file as normal and move on to subdir/file1, where we realize the entry name for this level is simply just "subdir", write down an entry for "subdir" then jump three items ahead to the-last-file. That is what happens normally when the first file in subdir is not an i-t-a entry. If subdir/file1 is an i-t-a, because of the broken condition in this code, we still think "subdir" is an i-t-a file and not writing "subdir" down and jump to the-last-file. The result tree now only has two items: a-file and the-last-file. subdir should be there too (even though it only records two sub-entries, file2 and file3). If the i-t-a entry is subdir/file2 or subdir/file3, this is not a problem because we jump over them anyway. Which may explain why the bug is hidden for nearly four years. Fix it by making sure we only skip i-t-a entries when the entry in question is actual an index entry, not a directory. Reported-by: NYuri Kanivetsky <yuri.kanivetsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 26 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 brian m. carlson 提交于
Signed-off-by: Nbrian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
Using FLEX_ARRAY macros reduces the amount of manual computation size we have to do. It also ensures we don't overflow size_t, and it makes sure we write the same number of bytes that we allocated. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 20 11月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 brian m. carlson 提交于
Convert all instances of get_object_hash to use an appropriate reference to the hash member of the oid member of struct object. This provides no functional change, as it is essentially a macro substitution. Signed-off-by: Nbrian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
-
由 brian m. carlson 提交于
Convert most instances where the sha1 member of struct object is dereferenced to use get_object_hash. Most instances that are passed to functions that have versions taking struct object_id, such as get_sha1_hex/get_oid_hex, or instances that can be trivially converted to use struct object_id instead, are not converted. Signed-off-by: Nbrian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
-
- 07 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 05 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Tan 提交于
A caller may wish to write a temporary index as a tree. However, write_cache_as_tree() assumes that the index was read from, and will write to, the default index file path. Introduce write_index_as_tree() which removes this limitation by allowing the caller to specify its own index_state and index file path. Signed-off-by: NPaul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 31 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
The loop in cache-tree's update_one iterates over all the entries in the index. For each one, we find the cache-tree subtree which represents our path (creating it if necessary), and then recurse into update_one again. The return value we get is the number of index entries that belonged in that subtree. So for example, with entries: a/one a/two b/one We start by processing the first entry, "a/one". We would find the subtree for "a" and recurse into update_one. That would then handle "a/one" and "a/two", and return the value 2. The parent function then skips past the 2 handled entries, and we continue by processing "b/one". If the recursed-into update_one ever returns 0, then we make no forward progress in our loop. We would process "a/one" over and over, infinitely. This should not happen normally. Any subtree we create must have at least one path in it (the one that we are processing!). However, we may also reuse a cache-tree entry we found in the on-disk index. For the same reason, this should also never have zero entries. However, certain buggy versions of libgit2 could produce such bogus cache-tree records. The libgit2 bug has since been fixed, but it does not hurt to protect ourselves against bogus input coming from the on-disk data structures. Note that this is not a die("BUG") or assert, because it is not an internal bug, but rather a corrupted on-disk structure. It's possible that we could even recover from it (by throwing out the bogus cache-tree entry), but it is not worth the effort; the important thing is that we report an error instead of looping infinitely. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Haggerty 提交于
Move the interface declaration for the functions in lockfile.c from cache.h to a new file, lockfile.h. Add #includes where necessary (and remove some redundant includes of cache.h by files that already include builtin.h). Move the documentation of the lock_file state diagram from lockfile.c to the new header file. Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
We punt from repairing the cache-tree during a branch switching if it involves having to create a new tree object that does not yet exist in the object store. "mkdir dir && >dir/file && git add dir" followed by "git checkout" is one example, when a tree that records the state of such "dir/" is not in the object store. However, after discovering that we do not have a tree object that records the state of "dir/", the caller failed to remember the fact that it noticed the cache-tree entry it received for "dir/" is invalidated, it already knows it should not be populating the level that has "dir/" as its immediate subdirectory, and it is not an error at all for the sublevel cache-tree entry gave it a bogus object name it shouldn't even look at. This led the caller to detect and report a non-existent error. The end result was the same and we avoided stuffing a non-existent tree to the cache-tree, but we shouldn't have issued an alarming error message to the user. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 08 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Turner 提交于
When git checkout checks out a branch, create or update the cache-tree so that subsequent operations are faster. update_main_cache_tree learned a new flag, WRITE_TREE_REPAIR. When WRITE_TREE_REPAIR is set, portions of the cache-tree which do not correspond to existing tree objects are invalidated (and portions which do are marked as valid). No new tree objects are created. Signed-off-by: NDavid Turner <dturner@twitter.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 6月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rohit Mani 提交于
Avoid scanning strings twice, once with strchr() and then with strlen(), by using strchrnul(). Helped-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NRohit Mani <rohit.mani@outlook.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 3月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Haggerty 提交于
The search for the end of the slashes is part of the update of the path variable for the next iteration as opposed to an update of the slash variable. So iterate using path rather than slash. Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Michael Haggerty 提交于
There is no need for an early return it; from the loop if slash points at the end of the string, because that is exactly what will happen when the while condition fails at the start of the next iteration. Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Michael Haggerty 提交于
If *slash == '/', then it is necessarily non-NUL. Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Michael Haggerty 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Michael Haggerty 提交于
Suggested-by: NJunio Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Michael Haggerty 提交于
slash is initialized to a value that cannot be NULL. So remove the guards against slash == NULL later in the loop. Suggested-by: NDavid Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry S. Dolzhenko 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDmitry S. Dolzhenko <dmitrys.dolzhenko@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
I attempted to make index_state->cache[] a "const struct cache_entry **" to find out how existing entries in index are modified and where. The question I have is what do we do if we really need to keep track of on-disk changes in the index. The result is - diff-lib.c: setting CE_UPTODATE - name-hash.c: setting CE_HASHED - preload-index.c, read-cache.c, unpack-trees.c and builtin/update-index: obvious - entry.c: write_entry() may refresh the checked out entry via fill_stat_cache_info(). This causes "non-const struct cache_entry *" in builtin/apply.c, builtin/checkout-index.c and builtin/checkout.c - builtin/ls-files.c: --with-tree changes stagemask and may set CE_UPDATE Of these, write_entry() and its call sites are probably most interesting because it modifies on-disk info. But this is stat info and can be retrieved via refresh, at least for porcelain commands. Other just uses ce_flags for local purposes. So, keeping track of "dirty" entries is just a matter of setting a flag in index modification functions exposed by read-cache.c. Except unpack-trees, the rest of the code base does not do anything funny behind read-cache's back. The actual patch is less valueable than the summary above. But if anyone wants to re-identify the above sites. Applying this patch, then this: diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h index 430d021..1692891 100644 --- a/cache.h +++ b/cache.h @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static inline unsigned int canon_mode(unsigned int mode) #define cache_entry_size(len) (offsetof(struct cache_entry,name) + (len) + 1) struct index_state { - struct cache_entry **cache; + const struct cache_entry **cache; unsigned int version; unsigned int cache_nr, cache_alloc, cache_changed; struct string_list *resolve_undo; will help quickly identify them without bogus warnings. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 16 12月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Intent-to-add entries used to forbid writing trees so it was not a problem. After commit 3f6d56de (commit: ignore intent-to-add entries instead of refusing - 2012-02-07), we can generate trees from an index with i-t-a entries. However, the commit forgets to invalidate all paths leading to i-t-a entries. With fully valid cache-tree (e.g. after commit or write-tree), diff operations may prefer cache-tree to index and not see i-t-a entries in the index, because cache-tree does not have them. Reported-by: NJonathon Mah <me@JonathonMah.com> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
entry_count is used in update_one() for two purposes: 1. to skip through the number of processed entries in in-memory index 2. to record the number of entries this cache-tree covers on disk Unfortunately when CE_REMOVE is present these numbers are not the same because CE_REMOVE entries are automatically removed before writing to disk but entry_count is not adjusted and still counts CE_REMOVE entries. Separate the two use cases into two different variables. #1 is taken care by the new field count in struct cache_tree_sub and entry_count is prepared for #2. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
The loops in update_one can be increased in two different ways: step by one for files and by <n> for directories. "for" loop is not suitable for this as it always steps by one and special handling is required for directories. Replace them with "while" loops for clarity. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
This code is added in 331fcb59 (git add --intent-to-add: do not let an empty blob be committed by accident - 2008-11-28) to forbid committing when i-t-a entries are present. When we allow that, we forgot to remove this. Noticed-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 08 2月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Originally, "git add -N" was introduced to help users from forgetting to add new files to the index before they ran "git commit -a". As an attempt to help them further so that they do not forget to say "-a", "git commit" to commit the index as-is was taught to error out, reminding the user that they may have forgotten to add the final contents of the paths before running the command. This turned out to be a false "safety" that is useless. If the user made changes to already tracked paths and paths added with "git add -N", and then ran "git add" to register the final contents of the paths added with "git add -N", "git commit" will happily create a commit out of the index, without including the local changes made to the already tracked paths. It was not a useful "safety" measure to prevent "forgetful" mistakes from happening. It turns out that this behaviour is not just a useless false "safety", but actively hurts use cases of "git add -N" that were discovered later and have become popular, namely, to tell Git to be aware of these paths added by "git add -N", so that commands like "git status" and "git diff" would include them in their output, even though the user is not interested in including them in the next commit they are going to make. Fix this ancient UI mistake, and instead make a commit from the index ignoring the paths added by "git add -N" without adding real contents. Based on the work by Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy, and helped by injection of sanity from Jonathan Nieder and others on the Git mailing list. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Rast 提交于
We'll need to safely create or update the cache-tree data of the_index from other places. While at it, give it an argument that lets us silence the messages produced by unmerged entries (which prevent it from working). Signed-off-by: NThomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 07 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Elijah Newren 提交于
Signed-off-by: NElijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 12 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Nieder 提交于
Noticed by valgrind during test t0000.35 “writing this tree without --missing-ok”. Even in the cherry-pick foo..bar code path, such an error is the end of the line. But maybe some day an interactive porcelain will want to link to libgit, making this matter. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Not that anybody should ever get it, but somebody did (probably because of a flaky filesystem, but whatever). And each time I see an error message that I haven't seen before, I decide that next time it will look better. So this makes us write more relevant information about exactly which file ended up having issues with a missing object. Which will tell whether it was a tree object, for example, or just a regular file in the index (and which one). Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 26 5月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When running "diff-index --cached" after making a change to only a small portion of the index, there is no point unpacking unchanged subtrees into the index recursively, only to find that all entries match anyway. Tweak unpack_trees() logic that is used to read in the tree object to catch the case where the tree entry we are looking at matches the index as a whole by looking at the cache-tree. As an exercise, after modifying a few paths in the kernel tree, here are a few numbers on my Athlon 64X2 3800+: (without patch, hot cache) $ /usr/bin/time git diff --cached --raw :100644 100644 b57e1f5... e69de29... M Makefile :100644 000000 8c86b72... 0000000... D arch/x86/Makefile :000000 100644 0000000... e69de29... A arche 0.07user 0.02system 0:00.09elapsed 102%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+9407minor)pagefaults 0swaps (with patch, hot cache) $ /usr/bin/time ../git.git/git-diff --cached --raw :100644 100644 b57e1f5... e69de29... M Makefile :100644 000000 8c86b72... 0000000... D arch/x86/Makefile :000000 100644 0000000... e69de29... A arche 0.02user 0.00system 0:00.02elapsed 103%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+2446minor)pagefaults 0swaps Cold cache numbers are very impressive, but it does not matter very much in practice: (without patch, cold cache) $ su root sh -c 'echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' $ /usr/bin/time git diff --cached --raw :100644 100644 b57e1f5... e69de29... M Makefile :100644 000000 8c86b72... 0000000... D arch/x86/Makefile :000000 100644 0000000... e69de29... A arche 0.06user 0.17system 0:10.26elapsed 2%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 247032inputs+0outputs (1172major+8237minor)pagefaults 0swaps (with patch, cold cache) $ su root sh -c 'echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' $ /usr/bin/time ../git.git/git-diff --cached --raw :100644 100644 b57e1f5... e69de29... M Makefile :100644 000000 8c86b72... 0000000... D arch/x86/Makefile :000000 100644 0000000... e69de29... A arche 0.02user 0.01system 0:01.01elapsed 3%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 18440inputs+0outputs (79major+2369minor)pagefaults 0swaps This of course helps "git status" as well. (without patch, hot cache) $ /usr/bin/time ../git.git/git-status >/dev/null 0.17user 0.18system 0:00.35elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+5336outputs (0major+10970minor)pagefaults 0swaps (with patch, hot cache) $ /usr/bin/time ../git.git/git-status >/dev/null 0.10user 0.16system 0:00.27elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+5336outputs (0major+3921minor)pagefaults 0swaps Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Earlier cache_tree_find() needs to be called with a valid cache_tree, but repeated look-up may find an invalid or missing cache_tree in between. Help simplify the callers by returning NULL to mean "nothing appropriate found" when the input is NULL. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 21 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This allows you to discard the cache-tree information before writing the tree out of the index (i.e. it always recomputes the tree object names for all the subtrees). This is only useful as a debug option, so I did not bother documenting it. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 20 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The interface to build cache-tree belongs there. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-