- 25 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
We should always avoid rewriting a built file during `make install` if nothing has changed since `make all`. This is to help support the typical installation process of compiling a package as yourself, then installing it as root. Forcing CREDITS-FILE to be always be rebuilt in the Makefile means that CREDITS-GEN needs to check for a change and only update CREDITS-FILE if the file content actually differs. After all, content is king in Git. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 21 2月, 2007 6 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Attempting to use `git citool` to create an initial commit caused git-gui to crash with a Tcl error as it tried to add the newly born branch to the non-existant branch menu. Moving this code to after the normal commit cleanup logic resolves the issue, as we only have a branch menu if we are not in singlecommit mode. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
I'm apparently not very good at keeping my own TODO file current. I its also somewhat strange to keep the TODO list as part of the software branch, as its meta-information that is not directly related to the code. I'm pulling the TODO list from git-gui and moving it into a seperate branch. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Now that the 'browser' subcommand can be used to startup the tree browser, it should be listed as a possible subcommand option in our usage message. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Since git-gui does more than create commits, it is unfair to call it "a commit creation tool". Instead lets just call it a graphical user interface. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Now that git-gui has been released to the public as part of Git 1.5.0 I am starting to see some work from other people beyond myself and Paul. Consequently the copyright for git-gui is not strictly the two of us anymore, and these others deserve to have some credit given to them. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
The Firefox browser requires that a URL use / to delimit directories. This is instead of \, as \ gets escaped by the browser into its hex escape code and then relative URLs are incorrectly resolved, Firefox no longer sees the directories for what they are. Since we are handing the browser a true URL, we better use the standard / for directories. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 18 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Martin Waitz noticed that git-gui crashed while saving the user's options out if the application was started in blame mode. This was caused by the do_save_config procedure invoking reshow_diff incase the number of context lines was modified by the user. Because we bypassed main window UI setup to enter blame mode we did not set many of the globals which were accessed by reshow_diff, and reading unset variables is an error in Tcl. Aside from moving the globals to be set earlier, I also modified reshow_diff to not invoke clear_diff if there is no path currently in the diff viewer. This way reshow_diff does not crash when in blame mode due to the $ui_diff command not being defined. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 16 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Some users may find being able to browse around an arbitrary branch to be handy, so we now expose our graphical browser through `git gui browse <committish>`. Yes, I'm being somewhat lazy and making the user give us the name of the branch to browse. They can always enter HEAD. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 15 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Koegler 提交于
I'm missing the possibility to base a new branch on a tag. The following adds a tag drop down to the new branch dialog. Signed-off-by: NMartin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 14 2月, 2007 6 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Some distributions are using Git for part of their package management system, but unpack Git's own source code for delivery from the .tar.gz. This means that when we walk up the directory tree with git-describe to locate a Git repository, the repository we find is for the distribution and *not* for git-gui. Consequently any tag we might find there is bogus and does not apply to us. In this case the version file should always exist and be readable, as the packager is working from the released .tar.gz sources. So we should always favor the version file over anything git-describe guess for us. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Like `git version`, `git gui version` (or `git gui --version`) shows the version of git-gui, in case the user needs to know this, without looking at it in the GUI about dialog. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
I started to find it confusing that git-gui would refer to itself as git-citool when it was started through the citool hardlink, or with the citool subcommand. What was especially confusing was the options dialog and the about dialog, as both seemed to imply they were somehow different from the git-gui versions. In actuality there is no difference at all. Now we just call our options menu item 'Options...' (skipping the application name) and our About dialog now always shows git-gui within the short description (above the copyleft notice) and in the version field. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
It was pointed out on the git mailing list by Martin Koegler that we did not show tags as possible things to merge into the current branch. They actually are, and core Git's Grand Unified Merge Driver will accept them just like any other commit. So our merge dialog now requests all refs/heads, refs/remotes and refs/tags named refs and attempts to match them against the commits not in HEAD. One complicating factor here is that we must use the %(*objectname) field when talking about an annotated tag, as they will not appear in the output of rev-list. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
This is a very crude (but hopefully effective) check against the `git` executable found in our PATH. Some of the subcommands and options that git-gui requires to be present to operate were created during the 1.5.0 development cycle, so 1.5 is the minimum version of git that we can expect to support. There actually are early releases of 1.5 (e.g. 1.5.0-rc0) that don't have everything we expect (like `blame --incremental`) but these are purely academic at this point. 1.5.0 final was tagged and released just a few hours ago. The release candidates will (hopefully) fade into the dark quickly. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
As we frequently need to execute a Git subcommand and obtain its returned output we are making heavy use of [exec git foo] to run foo. As I'm concerned about possibly needing to carry environment data through a shell on Cygwin for at least some subcommands, I'm migrating all current calls to a new git proc. This actually makes the code look cleaner too, as we aren't saying 'exec git' everywhere. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 13 2月, 2007 7 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Parkins 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAndy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
This is the start of the 0.6 series of git-gui. I'm calling it 0.6 (rather than any other value) as I already had a private tag on one system based on 0.5, and that tag is quite a bit behind this version. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
When we are included as a subproject, such as how git.git carries us, we want to retain our own version number and not the version number assigned by git.git's own tags. Consequently we need to locate the correct tag which applies to our tree content and its commit lineage. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
I've decided to use gitgui-0.5 as the format for tags in the git-gui repository. The prefix of gitgui was chosen here to make its namespace different from the namespace used by git itself, allowing developers to pull both tag namespaces into the same repository. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Because git-gui is being shipped as a subproject of the main Git project and will often have a different lifecycle than the main Git project, we should ship our own version number in the release tarball rather than relying on the main Git version file. Git's master Makefile will invoke our own with the target dist-version, asking us to save off our GITGUI_VERSION value into our own version file, so that our GIT-VERSION-GEN script can recover it at build time. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Now that the decision has been made to treat git-gui as a subproject, rather than merging it directly into git, we should use a different substitution for our version value to avoid any possible confusion. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
When used as a subproject within git.git our Makefile must honor the gitexecdir which git.git's Makefile is passing down to us, ensuring that we install our executables into the libexec chosen by the end-user or packager. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 12 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Now that git 1.5.0 and later contains a version of gitk that uses correct geometry on Windows platforms, even if ~/.gitk exists, we should not delete the user's ~/.gitk to work around the bug. It is downright mean to remove a user's preferences for another app. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 09 2月, 2007 14 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Rather than trying to mark the background color of the line numbers to show which lines have annotated data loaded, we now show a ruler between the line numbers and the file data. This ruler is just 1 character wide and its background color is set to grey to denote which lines have annotation ready. I had to make this change as I kept loosing the annotation marker when a line was no longer colored as part of the current selection. We now color the lines blamed on the current commit in yellow, the lines in the commit which came after (descendant) in red (hotter, less tested) and the lines in the commit before (ancestor) in blue (cooler, better tested). Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
To help clue users into the fact that annotation data arrives incrementally, and that they should try to locate the region they want while the tool is running, we jump to the first line of the first annotation if the user has not already clicked on a line they are interested in and if the window is still looking at the very top of the file. Since it takes a second (at least on my PowerBook) to even generate the first annotation for git-gui.sh, the user should have plenty of time to adjust the scrollbar or click on a line even before we get that first annotation record in, which allows the user to bypass our automatic jumping. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Using 180 columns worth of screen space to display just 20 columns of file data and 160 columns worth of annotation information is not practically useful. Users need/want to see the file data, and have the anotation associated with it displayed in a detail pane only when they have focused on a particular region of the file. Now our file viewer has a small 10-line high pane below the file which shows the commit message for the commit this line was blamed on. The columns have all been removed, except the current line number column as that has some real value when trying to locate an interesting block. To keep the user entertained we have a progress meter in the status bar of the viewer which lets them know how many lines have been annotated, and how much has been completed. We use a grey background on the line numbers for lines which we have obtained annotation from, and we color all lines in the current commit with a yellow background, so they stand out when scanning through the file. All other lines are kept with a white background, making the yellow really pop. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Now that core Git has "renamed" git-repo-config to git-config, we should do the same. I don't know how long core Git will keep the repo-config command, and since git-gui's userbase is so small and almost entirely on some flavor of 1.5.0-rc2 or later, where the rename has already taken place, it should be OK to rename now. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
One user that I spoke with recently was confused why the 'Add All' button did not add all of his 'Changed But Not Updated' files. The particular files in question were new, and thus not known to Git. Since the 'Add All' routine only updates files which are already tracked, they were not added automatically. I suspect that calling this action 'Add Existing' would be less confusing, so I'm renaming it. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
If we are invoked as `git-foo`, then we should run the `foo` subcommand, as the user has made some sort of link from `git-foo` to our actual program code. So we should honor their request. If we are invoked as `git-gui foo`, the user has not made a link (or did, but is not using it right now) so we should execute the `foo` subcommand. We now can start the single commit UI mode via `git-citool` and also through `git gui citool`. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Viewing annotated files is one of those tasks that is relatively difficult to do in a simple vt100 terminal emulator. The user really wants to be able to browse through a lot of information, and to interact with it by navigating through revisions. Now users can start our file viewer with annotations by running 'git gui blame commit path', thereby seeing the contents of the given file at the given commit. Right now I am being lazy by not allowing the user to omit the commit name (and have us thus assume HEAD). Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
If the commit area does not exist, don't save the commit message to a file, or the window geometry. The reason I'm doing this is I want to make the main window entirely optional, such as if the user has asked us to show a blame from the command line. In such cases the commit area won't exist and trying to get its text would cause an error. If we are running without the commit message area, we cannot save our window geometry either, as the root window '.' won't be a normal commit window. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
These are now controlled by the transport and branch options, rather than the multicommit option. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
This is a minor code cleanup to make working with what used to be the $single_commit flag easier. Its also to better handle various UI configurations, depending on command line parameters given by the user, or perhaps user preferences. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
We already replace \n with \\n so that Tk widgets don't start a new display line with part of a file path which is just unlucky enough to contain an LF. But then its confusing to read a path whose name actually contains \n as literal characters. Escaping \ to \\ would make that case display as \\n, clarifying the output. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Users want to navigate the file list shown in our branch browser windows using the keyboard. So we now support basic traversal with the arrow keys: Up/Down: Move the "selection bar" to focus on a different name. Return: Move into the subtree, or open the annotated file. M1-Right: Ditto. M1-Up: Move to the parent tree. M1-Left: Ditto. Probably the only feature missing from this is to key a leading part of the file name and jump directly to that file (or subtree). This change did require a bit of refactoring, to pull the navigation logic out of the mouse click procedure and into more generic routines which can also be used in bindings. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
If the user has created (or deleted) a branch through an external tool, and uses Rescan, they probably are trying to make git-gui update to show their newly created branch. So now we load all known heads and update the branch menu during any rescan operation, just in-case the set of known branches was modified. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 29 1月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
To help the user visually see which lines are associated with each other in the file we attempt to sign a unique background color to each commit and then render all text associated with that commit using that color. This works out OK for a file which has very few commits in it; but most files don't have that property. What we really need to do is look at what colors are used by our neighboring commits (if known yet) and pick a color which does not conflict with our neighbor. If we have run out of colors then we should force our neighbor to recolor too. Yes, its the graph coloring problem. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
Using a panedwindow to display the blame viewer's individual columns just doesn't make sense. Most of the important data fits within the columns we have allocated, and those that don't the leading part fits and that's good enough. There are just too many columns within this viewer to let the user sanely control individual column widths. This change shouldn't really be an issue for most git-gui users as their displays should be large enough to accept this massive dump of data. We now also have a properly working horizontal scrollbar for the current file data area. This makes it easier to get away with a narrow window when screen space is limited, as you can still scroll around within the file content. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-