- 24 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
Some time ago we changed git-log in a massive way, and one consequence is that the keyword changed. Adjust patch-id for that. [jc: as Linus suggests, allowing both old and new prefix.] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
- 15 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Do our own ctype.h, just to get the sane semantics: we want locale-independence, _and_ we want the right signed behaviour. Plus we only use a very small subset of ctype.h anyway (isspace, isalpha, isdigit and isalnum). Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
- 10 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kai Ruemmler 提交于
Two else equal patches should not result in different checksums, only because they were applied to different versions of the file. Signed-off-by: NKai Ruemmler <kai.ruemmler@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
- 28 7月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The *_usage strings should not start with "usage: ", since the usage() function gives its own. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
- 24 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
A "patch ID" is nothing but a SHA1 of the diff associated with a patch, with whitespace and line numbers ignored. As such, it's "reasonably stable", but at the same time also reasonably unique, ie two patches that have the same "patch ID" are almost guaranteed to be the same thing. IOW, you can use this thing to look for likely duplicate commits.
-