- 03 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Tan 提交于
In the documentation of diff-tree, it is stated that the -l option "prevents rename/copy detection from running if the number of rename/copy targets exceeds the specified number". The documentation does not mention any special handling for the number 0, but the implementation before commit 9f7e4bfa ("diff: remove silent clamp of renameLimit", 2017-11-13) treated 0 as a special value indicating that the rename limit is to be a very large number instead. The commit 9f7e4bfa changed that behavior, treating 0 as 0. Revert this behavior to what it was previously. This allows existing scripts and tools that use "-l0" to continue working. The alternative (to have "-l0" suppress rename detection) is probably much less useful, since users can just refrain from specifying -M and/or -C to have the same effect. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Reviewed-by: NJonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NElijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Elijah Newren 提交于
In commit 0024a549 (Fix the rename detection limit checking; 2007-09-14), the renameLimit was clamped to 32767. This appears to have been to simply avoid integer overflow in the following computation: num_create * num_src <= rename_limit * rename_limit although it also could be viewed as a hardcoded bound on the amount of CPU time we're willing to allow users to tell git to spend on handling renames. An upper bound may make sense, but unfortunately this upper bound was neither communicated to the users, nor documented anywhere. Although large limits can make things slow, we have users who would be ecstatic to have a small five file change be correctly cherry picked even if they have to manually specify a large limit and wait ten minutes for the renames to be detected. Signed-off-by: NElijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Elijah Newren 提交于
The possibility of setting merge.renameLimit beyond 2^16 raises the possibility that the values passed to progress can exceed 2^32. Use uint64_t, because it "ought to be enough for anybody". :-) Signed-off-by: NElijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 01 11月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Brandon Williams 提交于
Now that the flags stored in struct diff_flags are being accessed directly and not through macros, change all struct members from being uppercase to lowercase. This conversion is done using the following semantic patch: @@ expression E; @@ - E.RECURSIVE + E.recursive @@ expression E; @@ - E.TREE_IN_RECURSIVE + E.tree_in_recursive @@ expression E; @@ - E.BINARY + E.binary @@ expression E; @@ - E.TEXT + E.text @@ expression E; @@ - E.FULL_INDEX + E.full_index @@ expression E; @@ - E.SILENT_ON_REMOVE + E.silent_on_remove @@ expression E; @@ - E.FIND_COPIES_HARDER + E.find_copies_harder @@ expression E; @@ - E.FOLLOW_RENAMES + E.follow_renames @@ expression E; @@ - E.RENAME_EMPTY + E.rename_empty @@ expression E; @@ - E.HAS_CHANGES + E.has_changes @@ expression E; @@ - E.QUICK + E.quick @@ expression E; @@ - E.NO_INDEX + E.no_index @@ expression E; @@ - E.ALLOW_EXTERNAL + E.allow_external @@ expression E; @@ - E.EXIT_WITH_STATUS + E.exit_with_status @@ expression E; @@ - E.REVERSE_DIFF + E.reverse_diff @@ expression E; @@ - E.CHECK_FAILED + E.check_failed @@ expression E; @@ - E.RELATIVE_NAME + E.relative_name @@ expression E; @@ - E.IGNORE_SUBMODULES + E.ignore_submodules @@ expression E; @@ - E.DIRSTAT_CUMULATIVE + E.dirstat_cumulative @@ expression E; @@ - E.DIRSTAT_BY_FILE + E.dirstat_by_file @@ expression E; @@ - E.ALLOW_TEXTCONV + E.allow_textconv @@ expression E; @@ - E.TEXTCONV_SET_VIA_CMDLINE + E.textconv_set_via_cmdline @@ expression E; @@ - E.DIFF_FROM_CONTENTS + E.diff_from_contents @@ expression E; @@ - E.DIRTY_SUBMODULES + E.dirty_submodules @@ expression E; @@ - E.IGNORE_UNTRACKED_IN_SUBMODULES + E.ignore_untracked_in_submodules @@ expression E; @@ - E.IGNORE_DIRTY_SUBMODULES + E.ignore_dirty_submodules @@ expression E; @@ - E.OVERRIDE_SUBMODULE_CONFIG + E.override_submodule_config @@ expression E; @@ - E.DIRSTAT_BY_LINE + E.dirstat_by_line @@ expression E; @@ - E.FUNCCONTEXT + E.funccontext @@ expression E; @@ - E.PICKAXE_IGNORE_CASE + E.pickaxe_ignore_case @@ expression E; @@ - E.DEFAULT_FOLLOW_RENAMES + E.default_follow_renames Signed-off-by: NBrandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Brandon Williams 提交于
Remove the `DIFF_OPT_TST` macro and instead access the flags directly. This conversion is done using the following semantic patch: @@ expression E; identifier fld; @@ - DIFF_OPT_TST(&E, fld) + E.flags.fld @@ type T; T *ptr; identifier fld; @@ - DIFF_OPT_TST(ptr, fld) + ptr->flags.fld Signed-off-by: NBrandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
We used to expose the full power of the delayed progress API to the callers, so that they can specify, not just the message to show and expected total amount of work that is used to compute the percentage of work performed so far, the percent-threshold parameter P and the delay-seconds parameter N. The progress meter starts to show at N seconds into the operation only if we have not yet completed P per-cent of the total work. Most callers used either (0%, 2s) or (50%, 1s) as (P, N), but there are oddballs that chose more random-looking values like 95%. For a smoother workload, (50%, 1s) would allow us to start showing the progress meter earlier than (0%, 2s), while keeping the chance of not showing progress meter for long running operation the same as the latter. For a task that would take 2s or more to complete, it is likely that less than half of it would complete within the first second, if the workload is smooth. But for a spiky workload whose earlier part is easier, such a setting is likely to fail to show the progress meter entirely and (0%, 2s) is more appropriate. But that is merely a theory. Realistically, it is of dubious value to ask each codepath to carefully consider smoothness of their workload and specify their own setting by passing two extra parameters. Let's simplify the API by dropping both parameters and have everybody use (0%, 2s). Oh, by the way, the percent-threshold parameter and the structure member were consistently misspelled, which also is now fixed ;-) Helped-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Beller 提交于
When using the hashmap a common need is to have access to caller provided data in the compare function. A couple of times we abuse the keydata field to pass in the data needed. This happens for example in patch-ids.c. This patch changes the function signature of the compare function to have one more void pointer available. The pointer given for each invocation of the compare function must be defined in the init function of the hashmap and is just passed through. Documentation of this new feature is deferred to a later patch. This is a rather mechanical conversion, just adding the new pass-through parameter. However while at it improve the naming of the fields of all compare functions used by hashmaps by ensuring unused parameters are prefixed with 'unused_' and naming the parameters what they are (instead of 'unused' make it 'unused_keydata'). Signed-off-by: NStefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 17 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 提交于
Apply the result of the just-added coccinelle rule. This manually excludes a few occurrences, mostly things that resulted in many FREE_AND_NULL() on one line, that'll be manually fixed in a subsequent change. Signed-off-by: NÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 05 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Brandon Williams 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBrandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Brandon Williams 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBrandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tobias Klauser 提交于
The delta_limit parameter to diffcore_count_changes() has been unused since commit ba23bbc8 ("diffcore-delta: make change counter to byte oriented again.", 2006-03-04). Remove the parameter and adjust all callers. Signed-off-by: NTobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 30 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 René Scharfe 提交于
Apply the semantic patch contrib/coccinelle/qsort.cocci to the code base, replacing calls of qsort(3) with QSORT. The resulting code is shorter and supports empty arrays with NULL pointers. Signed-off-by: NRene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 René Scharfe 提交于
The result of st_mult() is the same no matter the order of its arguments. It invokes the macro unsigned_mult_overflows(), which divides the second parameter by the first one. Pass constants first to allow that division to be done already at compile time. Signed-off-by: NRene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Reviewed-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 29 6月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 brian m. carlson 提交于
Now that this struct's sha1 member is called "oid", update the comment and the sha1_valid member to be called "oid_valid" instead. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used to implement this, followed by the transformations in object_id.cocci: @@ struct diff_filespec o; @@ - o.sha1_valid + o.oid_valid @@ struct diff_filespec *p; @@ - p->sha1_valid + p->oid_valid Signed-off-by: Nbrian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 brian m. carlson 提交于
Convert struct diff_filespec's sha1 member to use a struct object_id called "oid" instead. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used to implement this, followed by the transformations in object_id.cocci: @@ struct diff_filespec o; @@ - o.sha1 + o.oid.hash @@ struct diff_filespec *p; @@ - p->sha1 + p->oid.hash Signed-off-by: Nbrian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 31 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 SZEDER Gábor 提交于
If the two paths 'dir/A/file' and 'dir/B/file' have identical content and the parent directory is renamed, e.g. 'git mv dir other-dir', then diffcore reports the following exact renames: renamed: dir/B/file -> other-dir/A/file renamed: dir/A/file -> other-dir/B/file While technically not wrong, this is confusing not only for the user, but also for git commands that make decisions based on rename information, e.g. 'git log --follow other-dir/A/file' follows 'dir/B/file' past the rename. This behavior is a side effect of commit v2.0.0-rc4~8^2~14 (diffcore-rename.c: simplify finding exact renames, 2013-11-14): the hashmap storing sources returns entries from the same bucket, i.e. sources matching the current destination, in LIFO order. Thus the iteration first examines 'other-dir/A/file' and 'dir/B/file' and, upon finding identical content and basename, reports an exact rename. Other hashmap users are apparently happy with the current iteration order over the entries of a bucket. Changing the iteration order would risk upsetting other hashmap users and would increase the memory footprint of each bucket by a pointer to the tail element. Fill the hashmap with source entries in reverse order to restore the original exact rename detection behavior. Reported-by: NBill Okara <billokara@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NSZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
If our size computation overflows size_t, we may allocate a much smaller buffer than we expected and overflow it. It's probably impossible to trigger an overflow in most of these sites in practice, but it is easy enough convert their additions and multiplications into overflow-checking variants. This may be fixing real bugs, and it makes auditing the code easier. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 28 2月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
The rename code cannot handle an input where we have duplicate destinations (i.e., more than one diff_filepair in the queue with the same string in its pair->two->path). We end up allocating only one slot in the rename_dst mapping. If we fill in the diff_filepair for that slot, when we re-queue the results, we may queue that filepair multiple times. When the diff is finally flushed, the filepair is processed and free()d multiple times, leading to heap corruption. This situation should only happen when a tree diff sees duplicates in one of the trees (see the added test for a detailed example). Rather than handle it, the sanest thing is just to turn off rename detection altogether for the diff. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
This function manages the mapping of destination pathnames to filepairs, and it handles both insertion and lookup. This makes the return value a bit confusing, as we return a newly created entry (even though no caller cares), and have no room to indicate to the caller that an entry already existed. Instead, let's break this up into two distinct functions, both backed by a common binary search. The binary search will use our normal "return the index if we found something, or negative index minus one to show where it would have gone" semantics. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 08 7月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
Hashmap entries are typically looked up by just a key. The hashmap_get() API expects an initialized entry structure instead, to support compound keys. This flexibility is currently only needed by find_dir_entry() in name-hash.c (and compat/win32/fscache.c in the msysgit fork). All other (currently five) call sites of hashmap_get() have to set up a near emtpy entry structure, resulting in duplicate code like this: struct hashmap_entry keyentry; hashmap_entry_init(&keyentry, hash(key)); return hashmap_get(map, &keyentry, key); Add a hashmap_get_from_hash() API that allows hashmap lookups by just specifying the key and its hash code, i.e.: return hashmap_get_from_hash(map, hash(key), key); Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
Copying the first bytes of a SHA1 is duplicated in six places, however, the implications (the actual value would depend on the endianness of the platform) is documented only once. Add a properly documented API for this. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry S. Dolzhenko 提交于
Use ALLOC_GROW() instead of open-coding it in locate_rename_dst() and register_rename_src(). Signed-off-by: NDmitry S. Dolzhenko <dmitrys.dolzhenko@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 25 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 11月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
The find_exact_renames function currently only uses the hash table for grouping, i.e.: 1. add sources 2. add destinations 3. iterate all buckets, per bucket: 4. split sources from destinations 5. iterate destinations, per destination: 6. iterate sources to find best match This can be simplified by utilizing the lookup functionality of the hash table, i.e.: 1. add sources 2. iterate destinations, per destination: 3. lookup sources matching the current destination 4. iterate sources to find best match This saves several iterations and file_similarity allocations for the destinations. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Karsten Blees 提交于
No actual code changes, just move hash_filespec up and outdent part of find_identical_files. Signed-off-by: NKarsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 17 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
This avoids unnecessary re-allocations and reinsertions. On webkit.git (i.e. about 182k inserts to the name hash table), this reduces about 100ms out of 3s user time. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 30 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
The diff code represents paths using the diff_filespec struct. This struct has a sha1 to represent the sha1 of the content at that path, as well as a sha1_valid member which indicates whether its sha1 field is actually useful. If sha1_valid is not true, then the filespec represents a working tree file (e.g., for the no-index case, or for when the index is not up-to-date). The diff_filespec is only used internally, though. At the interfaces to the diff subsystem, callers feed the sha1 directly, and we create a diff_filespec from it. It's at that point that we look at the sha1 and decide whether it is valid or not; callers may pass the null sha1 as a sentinel value to indicate that it is not. We should not typically see the null sha1 coming from any other source (e.g., in the index itself, or from a tree). However, a corrupt tree might have a null sha1, which would cause "diff --patch" to accidentally diff the working tree version of a file instead of treating it as a blob. This patch extends the edges of the diff interface to accept a "sha1_valid" flag whenever we accept a sha1, and to use that flag when creating a filespec. In some cases, this means passing the flag through several layers, making the code change larger than would be desirable. One alternative would be to simply die() upon seeing corrupted trees with null sha1s. However, this fix more directly addresses the problem (while bogus sha1s in a tree are probably a bad thing, it is really the sentinel confusion sending us down the wrong code path that is what makes it devastating). And it means that git is more capable of examining and debugging these corrupted trees. For example, you can still "diff --raw" such a tree to find out when the bogus entry was introduced; you just cannot do a "--patch" diff (just as you could not with any other corrupted tree, as we do not have any content to diff). Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 24 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
Our rename detection is a heuristic, matching pairs of removed and added files with similar or identical content. It's unlikely to be wrong when there is actual content to compare, and we already take care not to do inexact rename detection when there is not enough content to produce good results. However, we always do exact rename detection, even when the blob is tiny or empty. It's easy to get false positives with an empty blob, simply because it is an obvious content to use as a boilerplate (e.g., when telling git that an empty directory is worth tracking via an empty .gitignore). This patch lets callers specify whether or not they are interested in using empty files as rename sources and destinations. The default is "yes", keeping the original behavior. It works by detecting the empty-blob sha1 for rename sources and destinations. One more flexible alternative would be to allow the caller to specify a minimum size for a blob to be "interesting" for rename detection. But that would catch small boilerplate files, not large ones (e.g., if you had the GPL COPYING file in many directories). A better alternative would be to allow a "-rename" gitattribute to allow boilerplate files to be marked as such. I'll leave the complexity of that solution until such time as somebody actually wants it. The complaints we've seen so far revolve around empty files, so let's start with the simple thing. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jim Meyering 提交于
Since 9d8a5a50 (diffcore-rename: refactor "too many candidates" logic, 2011-01-06), diffcore_rename() initializes num_src but does not use it anymore. "-Wunused-but-set-variable" in gcc-4.6 complains about this. Signed-off-by: NJim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 29 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jim Meyering 提交于
Since 9d8a5a50 (diffcore-rename: refactor "too many candidates" logic, 2011-01-06), diffcore_rename() initializes num_src but does not use it anymore. "-Wunused-but-set-variable" in gcc-4.6 complains about this. Signed-off-by: NJim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 24 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin von Zweigbergk 提交于
Since e9c84099 (diff-index --cached --raw: show tree entry on the LHS for unmerged entries., 2007-01-05), an unmerged entry should be detected by using DIFF_PAIR_UNMERGED(p), not by noticing both one and two sides of the filepair records mode=0 entries. However, it forgot to update some parts of the rename detection logic. This only makes difference in the "diff --cached" codepath where an unmerged filepair carries information on the entries that came from the tree. It probably hasn't been noticed for a long time because nobody would run "diff -M" during a conflict resolution, but "git status" uses rename detection when it internally runs "diff-index" and "diff-files" and gives nonsense results. In an unmerged pair, "one" side can have a valid filespec to record the tree entry (e.g. what's in HEAD) when running "diff --cached". This can be used as a rename source to other paths in the index that are not unmerged. The path that is unmerged by definition does not have the final content yet (i.e. "two" side cannot have a valid filespec), so it can never be a rename destination. Use the DIFF_PAIR_UNMERGED() to detect unmerged filepair correctly, and allow the valid "one" side of an unmerged filepair to be considered a potential rename source, but never to be considered a rename destination. Commit message and first two test cases by Junio, the rest by Martin. Signed-off-by: NMartin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When there are too many paths in the project, the number of rename source candidates "git diff -C -C" finds will exceed the rename detection limit, and no inexact rename detection is performed. We however could fall back to "git diff -C" if the number of modified paths is sufficiently small. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This will allow us to later skip unmodified entries added due to "-C -C". We might also want to do something similar to rename_dst side, but that would only be for the sake of symmetry and not necessary for this series. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Move the logic to a separate function, to be enhanced by later patches in the series. While at it, swap the condition used in the if statement from "if it is too big then do this" to "if it would fit then do this". Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> --- Rebased to 'master' as the logic to use the result of this logic was updated recently, together with the addition of eye-candy.
-
- 22 2月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
We might spend many seconds doing inexact rename detection with no output. It's nice to let the user know that something is actually happening. This patch adds the infrastructure, but no callers actually turn on progress reporting. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
The warning is generated deep in the diffcore code, which means that it will come first, followed possibly by a spew of conflicts, making it hard to see. Instead, let's have diffcore pass back the information about how big the rename limit would needed to have been, and then the caller can provide a more appropriate message (and at a more appropriate time). No refactoring of other non-merge callers is necessary, because nobody else was even using the warn_on_rename_limit feature. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
The logic to quickly dismiss potential rename pairs was broken. It would too eagerly dismiss possible renames when all of the difference was due to pure new data (or deleted data). Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
We would allow rename detection to do copy detection even when asked purely for renames. That confuses users, but more importantly it can terminally confuse the recursive merge rename logic. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-