Skip to content

G
git

李少辉-开发者 / git
与 Fork 源项目一致

从无法访问的项目Fork

通知 2
Star 1
Fork 0
G
git

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 28 7月, 2015 2 次提交
    • J
      refs: loosen restriction on wildcard "*" refspecs · cd377f45
      由 Jacob Keller 提交于 
      Loosen restrictions on refspecs by allowing patterns that have a "*"
within a component instead of only as the whole component.

Remove the logic to accept a single "*" as a whole component from
check_refname_format(), and implement an extended form of that logic
in check_refname_component().  Pass the pointer to the flags argument
to the latter, as it has to clear REFNAME_REFSPEC_PATTERN bit when
it sees "*".

Teach check_refname_component() function to allow an asterisk "*"
only when REFNAME_REFSPEC_PATTERN is set in the flags, and drop the
bit after seeing a "*", to ensure that one side of a refspec
contains at most one asterisk.

This will allow us to accept refspecs such as `for/bar*:foo/baz*`.
Any refspec which functioned before shall continue functioning with
the new logic.
Signed-off-by: NJacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      cd377f45
    • J
      refs: cleanup comments regarding check_refname_component() · 53a8555e
      由 Jacob Keller 提交于 
      Correctly specify all characters which are rejected under the '4: a
bad character' disposition, which did not list all characters that
are treated as such.

Cleanup comment style for rejected refs by inserting a ", or" at the
end of each statement.
Signed-off-by: NJacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      53a8555e
  3. 22 7月, 2015 4 次提交
  5. 30 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      convert "enum date_mode" into a struct · a5481a6c
      由 Jeff King 提交于 
      In preparation for adding date modes that may carry extra
information beyond the mode itself, this patch converts the
date_mode enum into a struct.

Most of the conversion is fairly straightforward; we pass
the struct as a pointer and dereference the type field where
necessary. Locations that declare a date_mode can use a "{}"
constructor.  However, the tricky case is where we use the
enum labels as constants, like:

  show_date(t, tz, DATE_NORMAL);

Ideally we could say:

  show_date(t, tz, &{ DATE_NORMAL });

but of course C does not allow that. Likewise, we cannot
cast the constant to a struct, because we need to pass an
actual address. Our options are basically:

  1. Manually add a "struct date_mode d = { DATE_NORMAL }"
     definition to each caller, and pass "&d". This makes
     the callers uglier, because they sometimes do not even
     have their own scope (e.g., they are inside a switch
     statement).

  2. Provide a pre-made global "date_normal" struct that can
     be passed by address. We'd also need "date_rfc2822",
     "date_iso8601", and so forth. But at least the ugliness
     is defined in one place.

  3. Provide a wrapper that generates the correct struct on
     the fly. The big downside is that we end up pointing to
     a single global, which makes our wrapper non-reentrant.
     But show_date is already not reentrant, so it does not
     matter.

This patch implements 3, along with a minor macro to keep
the size of the callers sane.
Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      a5481a6c
  7. 23 6月, 2015 12 次提交
  9. 13 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      Allow to control where the replace refs are looked for · 58d121b2
      由 Mike Hommey 提交于 
      It can be useful to have grafts or replace refs for specific use-cases while
keeping the default "view" of the repository pristine (or with a different
set of grafts/replace refs).

It is possible to use a different graft file with GIT_GRAFT_FILE, but while
replace refs are more powerful, they don't have an equivalent override.

Add a GIT_REPLACE_REF_BASE environment variable to control where git is
going to look for replace refs.
Signed-off-by: NMike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      58d121b2
  11. 09 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 04 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 28 5月, 2015 5 次提交
  17. 26 5月, 2015 5 次提交
  19. 15 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      lock_packed_refs(): allow retries when acquiring the packed-refs lock · f4ab4f3a
      由 Michael Haggerty 提交于 
      Currently, there is only one attempt to acquire any lockfile, and if
the lock is held by another process, the locking attempt fails
immediately.

This is not such a limitation for loose reference files. First, they
don't take long to rewrite. Second, most reference updates have a
known "old" value, so if another process is updating a reference at
the same moment that we are trying to lock it, then probably the
expected "old" value will not longer be valid, and the update will
fail anyway.

But these arguments do not hold for packed-refs:

* The packed-refs file can be large and take significant time to
  rewrite.

* Many references are stored in a single packed-refs file, so it could
  be that the other process was changing a different reference than
  the one that we are interested in.

Therefore, it is much more likely for there to be spurious lock
conflicts in connection to the packed-refs file, resulting in
unnecessary command failures.

So, if the first attempt to lock the packed-refs file fails, continue
retrying for a configurable length of time before giving up. The
default timeout is 1 second.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      f4ab4f3a
  21. 13 5月, 2015 7 次提交
    • M
      ref_transaction_commit(): fix atomicity and avoid fd exhaustion · cf018ee0
      由 Michael Haggerty 提交于 
      The old code was roughly

    for update in updates:
        acquire locks and check old_sha
    for update in updates:
        if changing value:
            write_ref_to_lockfile()
            commit_ref_update()
    for update in updates:
        if deleting value:
            unlink()
    rewrite packed-refs file
    for update in updates:
        if reference still locked:
            unlock_ref()

This has two problems.

Non-atomic updates
==================

The atomicity of the reference transaction depends on all pre-checks
being done in the first loop, before any changes have started being
committed in the second loop. The problem is that
write_ref_to_lockfile() (previously part of write_ref_sha1()), which
is called from the second loop, contains two more checks:

* It verifies that new_sha1 is a valid object

* If the reference being updated is a branch, it verifies that
  new_sha1 points at a commit object (as opposed to a tag, tree, or
  blob).

If either of these checks fails, the "transaction" is aborted during
the second loop. But this might happen after some reference updates
have already been permanently committed. In other words, the
all-or-nothing promise of "git update-ref --stdin" could be violated.

So these checks have to be moved to the first loop.

File descriptor exhaustion
==========================

The old code locked all of the references in the first loop, leaving
all of the lockfiles open until later loops. Since we might be
updating a lot of references, this could result in file descriptor
exhaustion.

The solution
============

After this patch, the code looks like

    for update in updates:
        acquire locks and check old_sha
        if changing value:
            write_ref_to_lockfile()
        else:
            close_ref()
    for update in updates:
        if changing value:
            commit_ref_update()
    for update in updates:
        if deleting value:
            unlink()
    rewrite packed-refs file
    for update in updates:
        if reference still locked:
            unlock_ref()

This fixes both problems:

1. The pre-checks in write_ref_to_lockfile() are now done in the first
   loop, before any changes have been committed. If any of the checks
   fails, the whole transaction can now be rolled back correctly.

2. All lockfiles are closed in the first loop immediately after they
   are created (either by write_ref_to_lockfile() or by close_ref()).
   This means that there is never more than one open lockfile at a
   time, preventing file descriptor exhaustion.

To simplify the bookkeeping across loops, add a new REF_NEEDS_COMMIT
bit to update->flags, which keeps track of whether the corresponding
lockfile needs to be committed, as opposed to just unlocked. (Since
"struct ref_update" is internal to the refs module, this change is not
visible to external callers.)

This change fixes two tests in t1400.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      cf018ee0
    • M
      ref_transaction_commit(): remove the local flags variable · cbf50f9e
      由 Michael Haggerty 提交于 
      Instead, work directly with update->flags. This has the advantage that
the REF_DELETING bit, set in the first loop, can be read in the second
loop instead of having to be recomputed. Plus, it was potentially
confusing having both update->flags and flags, which sometimes had
different values.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      cbf50f9e
    • M
      ref_transaction_commit(): inline call to write_ref_sha1() · 61e51e00
      由 Michael Haggerty 提交于 
      That was the last caller, so delete function write_ref_sha1().
Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      61e51e00
    • M
      rename_ref(): inline calls to write_ref_sha1() from this function · ba43b7f2
      由 Michael Haggerty 提交于 
      Most of what it does is unneeded from these call sites.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      ba43b7f2
    • M
      commit_ref_update(): new function, extracted from write_ref_sha1() · ad4cd6c2
      由 Michael Haggerty 提交于 
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      ad4cd6c2
    • M
      write_ref_to_lockfile(): new function, extracted from write_ref_sha1() · e6fd3c67
      由 Michael Haggerty 提交于 
      This is the first step towards separating the checking and writing of
the new reference value to committing the change.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      e6fd3c67
    • M
      ref_transaction_commit(): fix atomicity and avoid fd exhaustion · 6c34492a
      由 Michael Haggerty 提交于 
      The old code was roughly

    for update in updates:
        acquire locks and check old_sha
    for update in updates:
        if changing value:
            write_ref_to_lockfile()
            commit_ref_update()
    for update in updates:
        if deleting value:
            unlink()
    rewrite packed-refs file
    for update in updates:
        if reference still locked:
            unlock_ref()

This has two problems.

Non-atomic updates
==================

The atomicity of the reference transaction depends on all pre-checks
being done in the first loop, before any changes have started being
committed in the second loop. The problem is that
write_ref_to_lockfile() (previously part of write_ref_sha1()), which
is called from the second loop, contains two more checks:

* It verifies that new_sha1 is a valid object

* If the reference being updated is a branch, it verifies that
  new_sha1 points at a commit object (as opposed to a tag, tree, or
  blob).

If either of these checks fails, the "transaction" is aborted during
the second loop. But this might happen after some reference updates
have already been permanently committed. In other words, the
all-or-nothing promise of "git update-ref --stdin" could be violated.

So these checks have to be moved to the first loop.

File descriptor exhaustion
==========================

The old code locked all of the references in the first loop, leaving
all of the lockfiles open until later loops. Since we might be
updating a lot of references, this could result in file descriptor
exhaustion.

The solution
============

After this patch, the code looks like

    for update in updates:
        acquire locks and check old_sha
        if changing value:
            write_ref_to_lockfile()
        else:
            close_ref()
    for update in updates:
        if changing value:
            commit_ref_update()
    for update in updates:
        if deleting value:
            unlink()
    rewrite packed-refs file
    for update in updates:
        if reference still locked:
            unlock_ref()

This fixes both problems:

1. The pre-checks in write_ref_to_lockfile() are now done in the first
   loop, before any changes have been committed. If any of the checks
   fails, the whole transaction can now be rolled back correctly.

2. All lockfiles are closed in the first loop immediately after they
   are created (either by write_ref_to_lockfile() or by close_ref()).
   This means that there is never more than one open lockfile at a
   time, preventing file descriptor exhaustion.

To simplify the bookkeeping across loops, add a new REF_NEEDS_COMMIT
bit to update->flags, which keeps track of whether the corresponding
lockfile needs to be committed, as opposed to just unlocked. (Since
"struct ref_update" is internal to the refs module, this change is not
visible to external callers.)

This change fixes two tests in t1400.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      6c34492a