- 25 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When we push to update an existing ref, if: * the object at the tip of the remote is not a commit; or * the object we are pushing is not a commit, it won't be correct to suggest to fetch, integrate and push again, as the old and new objects will not "merge". We should explain that the push must be forced when there is a non-committish object is involved in such a case. If we do not have the current object at the tip of the remote, we do not even know that object, when fetched, is something that can be merged. In such a case, suggesting to pull first just like non-fast-forward case may not be technically correct, but in practice, most such failures are seen when you try to push your work to a branch without knowing that somebody else already pushed to update the same branch since you forked, so "pull first" would work as a suggestion most of the time. And if the object at the tip is not a commit, "pull first" will fail, without making any permanent damage. As a side effect, it also makes the error message the user will get during the next "push" attempt easier to understand, now the user is aware that a non-commit object is involved. In these cases, the current code already rejects such a push on the client end, but we used the same error and advice messages as the ones used when rejecting a non-fast-forward push, i.e. pull from there and integrate before pushing again. Introduce new rejection reasons and reword the messages appropriately. [jc: with help by Peff on message details] Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Rorvick 提交于
References are allowed to update from one commit-ish to another if the former is an ancestor of the latter. This behavior is oriented to branches which are expected to move with commits. Tag references are expected to be static in a repository, though, thus an update to something under refs/tags/ should be rejected unless the update is forced. Signed-off-by: NChris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
send_pack() is used by transport.c, part of libgit.a while it stays in builtin/send-pack.c. Move it to send-pack.c so that we won't get undefined reference if a program that uses libgit.a happens to pull it in. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
-
- 11 8月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
Commit ff5effdf taught both clients and servers of the git protocol to send an "agent" capability that just advertises their version for statistics and debugging purposes. The protocol-capabilities.txt document however indicates that the client's advertisement is actually a response, and should never include capabilities not mentioned in the server's advertisement. Adding the unconditional advertisement in the server programs was OK, then, but the clients broke the protocol. The server implementation of git-core itself does not care, but at least one does: the Google Code git server (or any server using Dulwich), will hang up with an internal error upon seeing an unknown capability. Instead, each client must record whether we saw an agent string from the server, and respond with its agent only if the server mentioned it first. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
If we have capabilities to send to the server, we send the regular "want" line followed by a NUL, then the capabilities; otherwise, we do not even send the NUL. However, when checking whether we want to send the "quiet" capability, we check args->quiet, which is wrong. That flag only tells us whether the client side wanted to be quiet, not whether the server supports it (originally, in c207e34f, it meant both; however, that was later split into two flags by 01fdc21f). We still check the right flag when actually printing "quiet", so this could only have two effects: 1. We might send the trailing NUL when we do not otherwise need to. In theory, an antique pre-capability implementation of git might choke on this (since the client is instructed never to respond with capabilities that the server has not first advertised). 2. We might also want to send the quiet flag if the args->progress flag is false, but this code path would not trigger in that instance. In practice, it almost certainly never matters. The report-status capability dates back to 2005. Any real-world server is going to advertise that, and we will always respond with at least that capability. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
Instead of having the client advertise a particular version number in the git protocol, we have managed extensions and backwards compatibility by having clients and servers advertise capabilities that they support. This is far more robust than having each side consult a table of known versions, and provides sufficient information for the protocol interaction to complete. However, it does not allow servers to keep statistics on which client versions are being used. This information is not necessary to complete the network request (the capabilities provide enough information for that), but it may be helpful to conduct a general survey of client versions in use. We already send the client version in the user-agent header for http requests; adding it here allows us to gather similar statistics for non-http requests. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
The send_pack function gets a "progress" flag saying "yes, definitely show progress" or "no, definitely do not show progress". This gets set properly by transport_push when send_pack is called directly. However, when the send-pack command is executed separately (as it is for the remote-curl helper), there is no way to tell it "definitely do this". As a result, we do not properly respect "git push --no-progress" for smart-http remotes; you will still get progress if stderr is a tty. This patch teaches send-pack --progress and --no-progress, and teaches remote-curl to pass the appropriate option to override send-pack's isatty check. This fixes the --no-progress case above, and as a bonus, also makes "git push --progress" work when stderr is not a tty. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
The send_pack_args struct has two verbosity flags: "quiet" and "progress". Originally, if "quiet" was set, we would tell pack-objects explicitly to be quiet, and if "progress" was set, we would tell it to show progress. Otherwise, we told it neither, and it relied on isatty(2) to make the decision itself. However, commit 01fdc21f changed the meaning of these variables. Now both "quiet" and "!progress" instruct us to tell pack-objects to be quiet (and a non-zero "progress" means the same as before). This works well for transports which call send_pack directly, as the transport code copies transport->progress into send_pack_args->progress, and they both have the same meaning. However, the code path of calling "git send-pack" was left behind. It always sets "progress" to 0, and thus always tells pack-objects to be quiet. We can work around this by checking isatty(2) ourselves in the cmd_send_pack code path, restoring the original behavior of the send-pack command. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Clemens Buchacher 提交于
By default, progress output is disabled if stderr is not a terminal. The --progress option can be used to force progress output anyways. Conversely, --no-progress does not force progress output. In particular, if stderr is a terminal, progress output is enabled. This is unintuitive. Change --no-progress to force output off. Signed-off-by: NClemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 09 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Clemens Buchacher 提交于
Currently, git push --quiet produces some non-error output, e.g.: $ git push --quiet Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done. This fixes a bug reported for the fedora git package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725593Reported-by: NJesse Keating <jkeating@redhat.com> Cc: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> Commit 90a6c7d4 (propagate --quiet to send-pack/receive-pack) introduced the --quiet option to receive-pack and made send-pack pass that option. Older versions of receive-pack do not recognize the option, however, and terminate immediately. The commit was therefore reverted. This change instead adds a 'quiet' capability to receive-pack, which is a backwards compatible. In addition, this fixes push --quiet via http: A verbosity of 0 means quiet for remote helpers. Reported-by: NTobias Ulmer <tobiasu@tmux.org> Signed-off-by: NClemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
The get_remote_heads function reads the list of remote refs during git protocol session. It dates all the way back to def88e9a (Commit first cut at "git-fetch-pack", 2005-07-04). At that time, the idea was to come up with a list of refs we were interested in, and then filter the list as we got it from the remote side. Later, 1baaae5e (Make maximal use of the remote refs, 2005-10-28) stopped filtering at the get_remote_heads layer, letting us use the non-matching refs to find common history. As a result, all callers now simply pass an empty match list (and any future callers will want to do the same). So let's drop these now-useless parameters. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 13 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Yes, there is a warning that says the function is only used by push in big red letters in front of this function, but it didn't say a more important thing it should have said: what the function is for and what it does. Rename it and document it to avoid future confusion. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The message identifies the process as receive-pack when it cannot fork the sideband demultiplexer. We are actually a send-pack. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 07 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This reverts commit ffa69e61, reversing changes made to 4a13c4d1. Adding a new command line option to receive-pack and feed it from send-pack is not an acceptable way to add features, as there is no guarantee that your updated send-pack will be talking to updated receive-pack. New features need to be added via the capability mechanism negotiated over the protocol. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 01 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Clemens Buchacher 提交于
Currently, git push --quiet produces some non-error output, e.g.: $ git push --quiet Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done. Add the --quiet option to send-pack/receive-pack and pass it to unpack-objects in the receive-pack codepath and to receive-pack in the push codepath. This fixes a bug reported for the fedora git package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725593Reported-by: NJesse Keating <jkeating@redhat.com> Cc: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NClemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Boyd 提交于
Fix warnings from 'make check'. - These files don't include 'builtin.h' causing sparse to complain that cmd_* isn't declared: builtin/clone.c:364, builtin/fetch-pack.c:797, builtin/fmt-merge-msg.c:34, builtin/hash-object.c:78, builtin/merge-index.c:69, builtin/merge-recursive.c:22 builtin/merge-tree.c:341, builtin/mktag.c:156, builtin/notes.c:426 builtin/notes.c:822, builtin/pack-redundant.c:596, builtin/pack-refs.c:10, builtin/patch-id.c:60, builtin/patch-id.c:149, builtin/remote.c:1512, builtin/remote-ext.c:240, builtin/remote-fd.c:53, builtin/reset.c:236, builtin/send-pack.c:384, builtin/unpack-file.c:25, builtin/var.c:75 - These files have symbols which should be marked static since they're only file scope: submodule.c:12, diff.c:631, replace_object.c:92, submodule.c:13, submodule.c:14, trace.c:78, transport.c:195, transport-helper.c:79, unpack-trees.c:19, url.c:3, url.c:18, url.c:104, url.c:117, url.c:123, url.c:129, url.c:136, thread-utils.c:21, thread-utils.c:48 - These files redeclare symbols to be different types: builtin/index-pack.c:210, parse-options.c:564, parse-options.c:571, usage.c:49, usage.c:58, usage.c:63, usage.c:72 - These files use a literal integer 0 when they really should use a NULL pointer: daemon.c:663, fast-import.c:2942, imap-send.c:1072, notes-merge.c:362 While we're in the area, clean up some unused #includes in builtin files (mostly exec_cmd.h). Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 10月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
When pushing via builtin transports (like file://, git://), the underlying transport helper (in this case, git-pack-objects) did not get the --progress option, even if it was passed to git push. Fix this, and update the tests to reflect this. Note that according to the git-pack-objects documentation, we can safely apply the usual --progress semantics for the transport commands like clone and fetch (and for pushing over other smart transports). Reported-by: NChase Brammer <cbrammer@gmail.com> Helped-by: NJonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NTay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jonathan Nieder 提交于
Saying "pack-objects died with strange error" after "pack-objects died of signal 13" seems kind of redundant. The latter message was introduced when the run-command API changed to report abnormal exits on behalf of the caller (v1.6.5-rc0~86^2~5, 2009-07-04). Similarly, after a controlled pack-objects failure (detectable as a normal exit with nonzero status), a "died with strange error" message would be redundant next to the message from pack-objects itself. So leave off the "strange error" messages. The result should look something like this: $ git push sf master Counting objects: 21542, done. Compressing objects: 100% (4179/4179), done. fatal: Unable to create temporary file: Permission denied error: pack-objects died of signal 13 error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://sf.net/gitroot/project/project' $ Or in the "controlled exit" case (contrived example): [...] fatal: delta size changed error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://example.com/foo/bar' $ Improved-by: NJohannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This shrinks the top-level directory a bit, and makes it much more pleasant to use auto-completion on the thing. Instead of [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab> Display all 180 possibilities? (y or n) [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-sh builtin-shortlog.c builtin-show-branch.c builtin-show-ref.c builtin-shortlog.o builtin-show-branch.o builtin-show-ref.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shor<tab> builtin-shortlog.c builtin-shortlog.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shortlog.c you get [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab> [type] builtin/ builtin.h [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin [auto-completes to] [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sh<tab> [type] shortlog.c shortlog.o show-branch.c show-branch.o show-ref.c show-ref.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sho [auto-completes to] [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shor<tab> [type] shortlog.c shortlog.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shortlog.c which doesn't seem all that different, but not having that annoying break in "Display all 180 possibilities?" is quite a relief. NOTE! If you do this in a clean tree (no object files etc), or using an editor that has auto-completion rules that ignores '*.o' files, you won't see that annoying 'Display all 180 possibilities?' message - it will just show the choices instead. I think bash has some cut-off around 100 choices or something. So the reason I see this is that I'm using an odd editory, and thus don't have the rules to cut down on auto-completion. But you can simulate that by using 'ls' instead, or something similar. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 18 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Lukashov 提交于
The following functions are (almost) identical: verify_remote_names update_tracking_ref refs_pushed print_push_status Move common versions of these functions to transport.c and rename them, as suggested by Jeff King and Junio C Hamano. These functions have been removed entirely from builtin-send-pack.c, since they are only used internally by print_push_status(): print_ref_status status_abbrev print_ok_ref_status print_one_push_status Also, move #define SUMMARY_WIDTH to transport.h and rename it TRANSPORT_SUMMARY_WIDTH as it is used in builtin-fetch.c and transport.c Signed-off-by: NMichael Lukashov <michael.lukashov@gmail.com> Acked-by: NTay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
If the server advertises side-band-64k capability, we request it and pull the status report data out of side band #1, and let side band #2 go to our stderr. The latter channel be used by the remote side to send our user messages. This basically mirrors the side-band-64k capability in upload-pack. Servers may choose to use side band #2 to send error messages from hook scripts that are meant for the push end user. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tay Ray Chuan 提交于
Move the logic that detects up-to-date and non-fast-forward refs to a new function in remote.[ch], set_ref_status_for_push(). Make transport_push() invoke set_ref_status_for_push() before invoking the push_refs() implementation. (As a side-effect, the push_refs() implementation in transport-helper.c now knows of non-fast-forward pushes.) Removed logic for detecting up-to-date refs from the push_refs() implementation in transport-helper.c, as transport_push() has already done so for it. Make cmd_send_pack() invoke set_ref_status_for_push() before invoking send_pack(), as transport_push() can't do it for send_pack() here. Mark the test on the return status of non-fast-forward push to fail. Git now exits with success, as transport.c::transport_push() does not check for refs with status REF_STATUS_REJECT_NONFASTFORWARD nor does it indicate rejected pushes with its return value. Mark the test for ref status to succeed. As mentioned earlier, refs might be marked as non-fast-forwards, triggering the push status printing mechanism in transport.c. Signed-off-by: NTay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 24 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
Currently the --all-progress flag is used to use force progress display during the writing object phase even if output goes to stdout which is primarily the case during a push operation. This has the unfortunate side effect of forcing progress display even if stderr is not a terminal. Let's introduce the --all-progress-implied argument which has the same intent except for actually forcing the activation of any progress display. With this, progress display will be automatically inhibited whenever stderr is not a terminal, or full progress display will be included otherwise. This should let people use 'git push' within a cron job without filling their logs with useless percentage displays. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> Tested-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 05 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
The git-remote-curl backend detects if the remote server supports the git-receive-pack service, and if so, runs git-send-pack in a pipe to dump the command and pack data as a single POST request. The advertisements from the server that were obtained during the discovery are passed into git-send-pack before the POST request starts. This permits git-send-pack to operate largely unmodified. For smaller packs (those under 1 MiB) a HTTP/1.0 POST with a Content-Length is used, permitting interaction with any server. The 1 MiB limit is arbitrary, but is sufficent to fit most deltas created by human authors against text sources with the occasional small binary file (e.g. few KiB icon image). The configuration option http.postBuffer can be used to increase (or shink) this buffer if the default is not sufficient. For larger packs which cannot be spooled entirely into the helper's memory space (due to http.postBuffer being too small), the POST request requires HTTP/1.1 and sets "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". This permits the client to upload an unknown amount of data in one HTTP transaction without needing to pregenerate the entire pack file locally. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> CC: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 25 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Felipe Contreras 提交于
It's a compound word. Signed-off-by: NFelipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
When pushing over the git protocol, pack-objects gives progress reports about the pack being sent. If "push" is given the --quiet flag, it now passes "-q" to pack-objects, suppressing this output. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 28 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Rast 提交于
Change calls to die(..., strerror(errno)) to use the new die_errno(). In the process, also make slight style adjustments: at least state _something_ about the function that failed (instead of just printing the pathname), and put paths in single quotes. Signed-off-by: NThomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Clemens Buchacher 提交于
Avoid code duplication by moving list tail search to match_refs(). This does not change the semantics, except for http-push, which now inserts to the front of the ref list in order to get rid of the global remote_tail. Signed-off-by: NClemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Felipe Contreras 提交于
In preparation to be used when the ref object is not available Signed-off-by: NFelipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
The fetching of OFS_DELTA objects has been negotiated between both peers since git version 1.4.4. However, this was missing from the push side where every OFS_DELTA objects were always converted to REF_DELTA objects causing an increase in transferred data. To fix this, both the client and the server processes have to be modified: the former to invoke pack-objects with --delta-base-offset when the server provides the ofs-delta capability, and the later to send that capability when OFS_DELTA objects are allowed as already indicated by the repack.usedeltabaseoffset config variable which is TRUE by default since git v1.6.0. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 27 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Brandon Casey 提交于
The IRIX6.5 MIPSpro Compiler doesn't like it. Signed-off-by: NBrandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 3月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Barkalow 提交于
For native-protocol pushes (and other protocols as they are converted to the new method), this moves the refspec match, tracking update, and report message out of send-pack() and into transport_push(), where it can be shared completely with other protocols. This also makes fetch and push more similar in terms of what code is in what file. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Daniel Barkalow 提交于
The result should be consistent between fetch and push, so we ought to use the same code in both cases, even though it's short. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 26 2月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jay Soffian 提交于
ref_newer() appears to have been copied from builtin-send-pack.c to http-push.c via cut and paste. This patch moves the function and its helper unmark_and_free() to remote.c. There was a slight difference between the two implementations, one used TMP_MARK for the mark, the other used 1. Per Jeff King, I went with TMP_MARK as more correct. This is in preparation for being able to call it from builtin-remote.c Signed-off-by: NJay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jay Soffian 提交于
get_local_heads() appears to have been copied from builtin-send-pack.c to http-push.c via cut and paste. This patch moves the function and its helper one_local_ref() to remote.c. The two copies of one_local_ref() were not identical. I used the more recent version from builtin-send-pack.c after confirming with Jeff King that it was an oversight that commit 30affa1e did not update both copies. This is in preparation for being able to call it from builtin-remote.c Signed-off-by: NJay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 28 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
v1.6.1 introduced ".have" extension to the protocol to allow the receiving side to advertise objects that are reachable from refs in the repositories it borrows from. This was meant to be used by the sending side to avoid sending such objects; they are already available through the alternates mechanism. The client side implementation in v1.6.1, which was introduced with 40c155ff (push: prepare sender to receive extended ref information from the receiver, 2008-09-09) aka v1.6.1-rc1~203^2~1, were faulty in that it did not consider the possiblity that the repository receiver borrows from might have objects it does not know about. This fixes it by refraining from passing missing commits to underlying pack-objects. Revision machinery may need to be tightened further to treat missing uninteresting objects as non-error events, but this is an obvious and safe fix for a maintenance release that is almost good enough. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Clemens Buchacher 提交于
git push normally updates local refs only after a successful push. If the remote already has the updates -- pushed indirectly through another repository, for example -- we forget to update local tracking refs. Signed-off-by: NClemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
Since no version of receive-pack accepts these "funny refs", we should mirror the check when considering the list of refs to send. IOW, don't even make them eligible for matching or mirroring. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 27 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miklos Vajna 提交于
This had two problems with symrefs. First, it copied the actual sha1 instead of the "pointer", second it failed to remove the old ref after a successful rename. Given that till now delete_ref() always dereferenced symrefs, a new parameters has been introduced to delete_ref() to allow deleting refs without a dereference. Signed-off-by: NMiklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 16 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heikki Orsila 提交于
User notifications are presented as 'git cmd', and code comments are presented as '"cmd"' or 'git's cmd', rather than 'git-cmd'. Signed-off-by: NHeikki Orsila <heikki.orsila@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-