- 10 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pierre Habouzit 提交于
It seems we're using handle_revision_opt the same way each time, have a wrapper around it that does the 9-liner we copy each time instead. handle_revision_opt can be static in the module for now, it's always possible to make it public again if needed. Signed-off-by: NPierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 09 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pierre Habouzit 提交于
Add two fields to struct rev_info: - .def to store --default argument; and - .show_merge 1-bit field. handle_revision_opt() is able to deal with any revision option, and consumes them, and leaves revision arguments or pseudo arguments (like --all, --not, ...) in place. For now setup_revisions() does a pass of handle_revision_opt() again so that code not using it in a parse-opt parser still work the same. Signed-off-by: NPierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 26 5月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
... nor bogus "format.pretty = '=short'". Both are syntax errors. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
An obvious fix to the argument parser. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Adam Simpkins 提交于
Now get_revision() sorts the boundary commits when topo_order is set. Since sort_in_topological_order() takes a struct commit_list, it first places the boundary commits into revs->commits. Signed-off-by: NAdam Simpkins <adam@adamsimpkins.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Adam Simpkins 提交于
Previously the graphing API wasn't aware of the revs->boundary flag, and it always assumed that commits marked UNINTERESTING would not be displayed. As a result, the boundary commits were printed at the end of the log output, but they didn't have any branch lines connecting them to their children in the graph. There was also another bug in the get_revision() code that caused graph_update() to be called twice on the first boundary commit. This caused the graph API to think that a commit had been skipped, and print a "..." line in the output. Signed-off-by: NAdam Simpkins <adam@adamsimpkins.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Adam Simpkins 提交于
With the --graph option, the graph already outputs 'o' instead of '*' for boundary commits. Make it emit '<' or '>' when --left-right is specified. (This change also disables the '^' prefix for UNINTERESTING commits. The graph code currently doesn't print anything special for these commits, since it assumes no UNINTERESTING, non-BOUNDARY commits are displayed. This is potentially a bug if UNINTERESTING non-BOUNDARY commits can actually be displayed via some code path.) [jc: squashed the left-right change from Dscho and Adam's fixup into one] Signed-off-by: NAdam Simpkins <adam@adamsimpkins.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 13 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lars Hjemli 提交于
In add_parents_to_list, if any parent of a revision had already been SEEN, the current code would continue with the next parent, skipping the test for --first-parent. This patch inverts the test for SEEN so that the test for --first-parent is always performed. Signed-off-by: NLars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Simpkins 提交于
This new option causes a text-based representation of the history to be printed to the left of the normal output. Signed-off-by: NAdam Simpkins <adam@adamsimpkins.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Adam Simpkins 提交于
This change allows parent rewriting to be performed without causing the log and rev-list commands to print the parents. Signed-off-by: NAdam Simpkins <adam@adamsimpkins.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 30 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen R. van den Berg 提交于
The purpose of --first-parent is to view the tree without looking at side branche. This is accomplished by pretending there are no other parents than the first parent when encountering a merge. The current code marks the other parents as seen, which means that the tree traversal will behave differently depending on the order merges are handled. When a fast forward is artificially recorded as a merge, ----- / \ D---E---F---G master the current first-parent code considers E to be seen and stops the traversal after showing G and F. Signed-off-by: NStephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 13 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This adds a new --children option to the revision machinery. In addition to the list of parents, child commits of each commit are computed and stored as a decoration to each commit. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 12 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michele Ballabio 提交于
Jan Engelhardt noticed that while --topo-order can be overridden by a subsequent --date-order, the reverse was not possible. That's because setup_revisions() failed to set revs->lifo properly. Signed-off-by: NMichele Ballabio <barra_cuda@katamail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This attached patch introduces a single bit "use_terminator" in "struct rev_info", which is normally false (i.e. most formats use separator semantics) but by flipping it to true, you can ask for terminator semantics just like oneline format does. The function get_commit_format(), which is what parses "--pretty=" option, now takes a pointer to "struct rev_info" and updates its commit_format and use_terminator fields. It used to return the value of type "enum cmit_fmt", but all the callers assigned it to rev->commit_format. There are only two cases the code turns use_terminator on. Obviously, the traditional oneline format (--pretty=oneline) is one of them, and the new case is --pretty=tformat:... that acts like --pretty=format:... but flips the bit on. With this, "--pretty=tformat:%H %s" acts like --pretty=oneline. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
The revision limiter uses the commit date to decide when it has seen enough commits to finalize the revision list, but that can get confused if there are incorrect dates far in the past on some commits. This makes the logic a bit more robust by - we always walk an extra SLOP commits from the source list even if we decide that the source list is probably all done (unless the source is entirely empty, of course, because then we really can't do anything at all) - we keep track of the date of the last commit we added to the destination list (this will *generally* be the oldest entry we've seen so far) - we compare that with the youngest entry (the first one) of the source list, and if the destination is older than the source, we know we want to look at the source. which causes occasional date mishaps to be handled cleanly. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 29 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Uwe Kleine-König 提交于
These flags are already known to rev-parse and have the same meaning. This patch allows to run gitk as follows: gitk --branches --not --remotes to show only your local work. Signed-off-by: NUwe Kleine-König <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@digi.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 28 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The command did not reject the combination of these options, but did not show left/right markers. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 27 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jakub Narebski 提交于
Add support for -F | --fixed-strings option to "git log --grep" and friends: "git log --author", "git log --committer=<pattern>". Code is based on implementation of this option in "git grep". Signed-off-by: NJakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Koegler 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMartin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Martin Koegler 提交于
As these functions are directly called with the result from lookup_tree/blob, they must handle NULL. Signed-off-by: NMartin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
It's really not very easy to visualize the commit walker, because - on purpose - it obvously doesn't show the uninteresting commits! This adds a "--show-all" flag to the revision walker, which will make it show uninteresting commits too, and they'll have a '^' in front of them (it also fixes a logic error for !verbose_header for boundary commits - we should show the '-' even if left_right isn't shown). A separate patch to gitk to teach it the new '^' was sent to paulus. With the change in place, it actually is interesting even for the cases that git doesn't have any problems with, ie for the kernel you can do: gitk -d --show-all v2.6.24.. and you see just how far down it has to parse things to see it all. The use of "-d" is a good idea, since the date-ordered toposort is much better at showing why it goes deep down (ie the date of some of those commits after 2.6.24 is much older, because they were merged from trees that weren't rebased). So I think this is a useful feature even for non-debugging - just to visualize what git does internally more. When it actually breaks out due to the "everybody_uninteresting()" case, it adds the uninteresting commits (both the one it's looking at now, and the list of pending ones) to the list This way, we really list *all* the commits we've looked at. Because we now end up listing commits we may not even have been parsed at all "show_log" and "show_commit" need to protect against commits that don't have a commit buffer entry. That second part is debatable just how it should work. Maybe we shouldn't show such entries at all (with this patch those entries do get shown, they just don't get any message shown with them). But I think this is a useful case. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This allows the --relative option to say which subdirectory to pretend to be in, so that in a bare repository, you can say: $ git log --relative=drivers/ v2.6.20..v2.6.22 -- drivers/scsi/ Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This adds --relative option to the diff family. When you start from a subdirectory: $ git diff --relative shows only the diff that is inside your current subdirectory, and without $prefix part. People who usually live in subdirectories may like it. There are a few things I should also mention about the change: - This works not just with diff but also works with the log family of commands, but the history pruning is not affected. In other words, if you go to a subdirectory, you can say: $ git log --relative -p but it will show the log message even for commits that do not touch the current directory. You can limit it by giving pathspec yourself: $ git log --relative -p . This originally was not a conscious design choice, but we have a way to affect diff pathspec and pruning pathspec independently. IOW "git log --full-diff -p ." tells it to prune history to commits that affect the current subdirectory but show the changes with full context. I think it makes more sense to leave pruning independent from --relative than the obvious alternative of always pruning with the current subdirectory, which would break the symmetry. - Because this works also with the log family, you could format-patch a single change, limiting the effect to your subdirectory, like so: $ cd gitk-git $ git format-patch -1 --relative 911f1eb But because that is a special purpose usage, this option will never become the default, with or without repository or user preference configuration. The risk of producing a partial patch and sending it out by mistake is too great if we did so. - This is inherently incompatible with --no-index, which is a bolted-on hack that does not have much to do with git itself. I didn't bother checking and erroring out on the combined use of the options, but probably I should. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 27 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjen Laarhoven 提交于
In commit b7bb760d (Fix revision log diff setup, avoid unnecessary diff generation) an optimization was made to avoid unnecessary diff generation. This was partly fixed in 99516e35 (Fix embarrassing "git log --follow" bug). The '--diff-filter' option also needs the diff machinery in action. Signed-off-by: NArjen Laarhoven <arjen@yaph.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 12 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Instead of warning the user that it is expecting git log output from the standard input (and waiting for the user to type the log from the keyboard, which is a silly thing to do), default to traverse from HEAD when there is no rev parameter given and the standard input is a tty. This factors out a useful helper "add_head()" from builtin-diff.c to a more appropriate place revision.c while renaming it to more descriptive name add_head_to_pending(), as that is what the function is about. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 17 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
The function mark_tree_uninteresting() assumed that the tree entries are blob when they are not trees. This is not so. Since we do not traverse into submodules (yet), the gitlinks should be ignored. In general, we should try to start moving away from using the "S_ISLNK()" like things for internal git state. It was a mistake to just assume the numbers all were same across all systems in the first place. This implementation converts to the "object_type", and then uses a case statement. Noticed by Ilari on IRC. Test script taken from an earlier version by Dscho. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 11月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
We cannot tell a node that has been checked and found not to be interesting (which does not have the TREECHANGE flag) from a node that hasn't been checked if it is interesting or not, without relying on something else, such as object->parsed. But an object can get the "parsed" flag for other reasons. Which means that "TREECHANGE" has the wrong polarity. This changes the way how the path pruning logic marks an uninteresting commits. From now on, we consider a commit interesting by default, and explicitly mark the ones we decided to prune. The flag is renamed to "TREESAME". Then, this fixes the logic to show the early output with incomplete pruning. It basically says "a commit that has TREESAME set is kind-of-UNINTERESTING", but obviously in a different way than an outright UNINTERESTING commit. Until we parse and examine enough parents to determine if a commit becomes surely "kind-of-UNINTERESTING", we avoid rewriting the ancestry so that later rounds can fix things up. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
The function mark_tree_uninteresting() assumed that the tree entries are blob when they are not trees. This is not so. Since we do not traverse into submodules (yet), the gitlinks should be ignored. In general, we should try to start moving away from using the "S_ISLNK()" like things for internal git state. It was a mistake to just assume the numbers all were same across all systems in the first place. This implementation converts to the "object_type", and then uses a case statement. Noticed by Ilari on IRC. Test script taken from an earlier version by Dscho. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pierre Habouzit 提交于
reverse_diff was a bit-value in disguise, it's merged in the flags now. Signed-off-by: NPierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 11月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This removes the unnecessary indirection of "revs->prune_fn", since that function is always the same one (or NULL), and there is in fact not even an abstraction reason to make it a function (i.e. its not called from some other file and doesn't allow us to keep the function itself static or anything like that). It then just replaces it with a bit that says "prune or not", and if not pruning, every commit gets TREECHANGE. That in turn means that - if (!revs->prune_fn || (flags & TREECHANGE)) - if (revs->prune_fn && !(flags & TREECHANGE)) just become - if (flags & TREECHANGE) - if (!(flags & TREECHANGE)) respectively. Together with adding the "single_parent()" helper function, the "complex" conditional now becomes if (!(flags & TREECHANGE) && rev->dense && single_parent(commit)) continue; Also indirection of "revs->dense" checking is thrown away the same way, because TREECHANGE bit is set appropriately now. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This makes --early-output a bit more advanced, and actually makes it generate multiple "Final output:" headers as it updates things asynchronously. I realize that the "Final output:" line is now illogical, since it's not really final until it also says "done", but It now _always_ generates a "Final output:" header in front of any commit list, and that output header gives you a *guess* at the maximum number of commits available. However, it should be noted that the guess can be completely off: I do a reasonable job estimating it, but it is not meant to be exact. So what happens is that you may get output like this: - at 0.1 seconds: Final output: 2 incomplete .. 2 commits listed .. - half a second later: Final output: 33 incomplete .. 33 commits listed .. - another half a second after that: Final output: 71 incomplete .. 71 commits listed .. - another half second later: Final output: 136 incomplete .. 100 commits listed: we hit the --early-output limit, and .. will only output 100 commits, and after this you'll not .. see an "incomplete" report any more since you got as much .. early output as you asked for! - .. and then finally: Final output: 73106 done .. all the commits .. The above is a real-life scenario on my current kernel tree after having flushed all the caches. Tested with the experimental gitk patch that Paul sent out, and by looking at the actual log output (and verifying that my commit count guesses actually match real life fairly well). Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 11月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This adds support for "--early-output[=n]" as a flag to the "git log" family of commands. This allows GUI programs to state that they want to get some output early, in order to be able to show at least something quickly, even if the full output may take longer to generate. If no count is specified, a default count of a hundred commits will be used, although the actual numbr of commits output may be smaller depending on how many commits were actually found in the first tenth of a second (or if *everything* was found before that, in which case no early output will be provided, and only the final list is made available). When the full list is generated, there will be a "Final output:" string prepended to it, regardless of whether any early commits were shown or not, so that the consumer can always know the difference between early output and the final list. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
.. by not using quite so much indirection. This currently grows the "struct commit" a bit, which could be avoided by using a union for "util" and "indegree" (the topo-sort used to use "util" anyway, so you cannot use them together), but for now the goal of this was to simplify, not optimize. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 16 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
It turns out that I completely broke "git log --follow" with my recent patch to revision.c ("Fix revision log diff setup, avoid unnecessary diff generation", commit b7bb760d). Why? Because --follow obviously requires the diff machinery to function, exactly the same way pickaxe does. So everybody is away right now, but considering that nobody even noticed this bug, I don't think it matters. But for the record, here's the trivial one-liner fix (well, two, since I also fixed the comment). Because of the nature of the bug, if you ask for patches when following (which is one of the things I normally do), the bug is hidden, because then the request for diff output will automatically also enable the diffs themselves. So while "git log --follow <filename>" didn't work, adding a "-p" magically made it work again even without this fix. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
-
- 30 9月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Parkins 提交于
Factor out the code to parse --date=<format> parameter to revision walkers into a separate function, parse_date_format(). This function is passed a string and converts it to an enum date_format: - "relative" => DATE_RELATIVE - "iso8601" or "iso" => DATE_ISO8601 - "rfc2822" => DATE_RFC2822 - "short" => DATE_SHORT - "local" => DATE_LOCAL - "default" => DATE_NORMAL In the event that none of these strings is found, the function die()s. Signed-off-by: NAndy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
We used to incorrectly start calculating diffs whenever any argument but '-z' was recognized by the diff options parsing. That was bogus, since not all arguments result in diffs being needed, so we just waste a lot of time and effort on calculating diffs that don't matter. This actually also fixes another bug in "git log". Try this: git log -C and notice how it prints an extra empty line in between log entries, even though it never prints the actual diff (because we didn't ask for any diff format, so the diff machinery never prints anything). With this patch, that bogus empty line is gone, because "revs->diff" is never set. So this isn't just a "wasted time and effort" issue, it's also a slight semantic fix. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 16 9月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
We used to rely on the fact that cherry-pick would trigger the code path to set limited = 1 in handle_commit(), when an uninteresting commit was encountered. However, when cherry picking between two independent branches, i.e. when there are no merge bases, and there is only linear development (which can happen when you cvsimport a fork of a project), no uninteresting commit will be encountered. So set limited = 1 when --cherry-pick was asked for. Noticed by Martin Bähr. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
"git log" family of commands, even when run from a subdirectory, do not limit the revision range with the current directory as the path limiter, but with double-dash without any paths after it, i.e. "git log --" do so. It was a mistake to have a difference between "git log --" and "git log" introduced in commit ae563542 (First cut at libifying revlist generation). Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn O. Pearce 提交于
The --walk-reflogs logic and the --reverse logic are completely incompatible with one another. Attempting to use both at the same time leads to confusing results that sometimes violates the user's formatting options or ignores the user's request to see the reflog message and timestamp. Unfortunately the implementation of both of these features is glued onto the side of the revision walking machinary in such a way that they are probably not going to be easy to make them compatible with each other. Rather than offering the user confusing results we are better off bailing out with an error message until such a time as the implementations can be refactored to be compatible. Signed-off-by: NShawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marco Costalba 提交于
With this option git-log prints log message size just before the corresponding message. Porcelain tools could use this to speedup parsing of git-log output. Note that size refers to log message only. If also patch content is shown its size is not included. In case it is not possible to know the size upfront size value is set to zero. Signed-off-by: NMarco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-