1. 28 12月, 2005 5 次提交
    • J
      git-describe: still prefer annotated tag under --all and --tags · 64deb858
      Junio C Hamano 提交于
      Even though --all and --tags can be used to include non
      annotated tags in the reference point candidates, prefer to use
      annotated tags if there are more than one refs that name the
      same commit.
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
      64deb858
    • J
      git-describe: --tags and --abbrev · 2d9e7c9f
      Junio C Hamano 提交于
      With --tags, not just annontated tags, but also any ref under
      refs/tags/ are used to name the revision.
      
      The number of digits is configurable with the --abbrev=<n> option.
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
      2d9e7c9f
    • J
      git-describe: use find_unique_abbrev() · 4cdf78bf
      Junio C Hamano 提交于
      Just in case 8 hexadecimal digits are not enough.  We could use
      shorter default if we wanted to.
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
      4cdf78bf
    • J
      git-describe: really prefer tags only. · 635d4134
      Junio C Hamano 提交于
      Often there are references other than annotated tags under
      refs/tags hierarchy that are used to "keep things just in case".
      default to use annotated tags only, still leaving the option to
      use any ref with --all flag.
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
      635d4134
    • L
      Add a "git-describe" command · 908e5310
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      It shows you the most recent tag that is reachable from a particular
      commit is.
      
      Maybe this is something that "git-name-rev" should be taught to do,
      instead of having a separate command for it. Regardless, I find it useful.
      
      What it does is to take any random commit, and "name" it by looking up the
      most recent commit that is tagged and reachable from that commit. If the
      match is exact, it will just print out that ref-name directly. Otherwise
      it will print out the ref-name, followed by the 8-character "short SHA".
      
      IOW, with something like Junios current tree, I get:
      
      	[torvalds@g5 git]$ git-describe parent
      	refs/tags/v1.0.4-g2414721b
      
      ie the current head of my "parent" branch (ie Junio) is based on v1.0.4,
      but since it has a few commits on top of that, it has added the git hash
      of the thing to the end: "-g" + 8-char shorthand for the commit
      2414721b.
      
      Doing a "git-describe" on a tag-name will just show the full tag path:
      
      	[torvalds@g5 git]$ git-describe v1.0.4
      	refs/tags/v1.0.4
      
      unless there are _other_ tags pointing to that commit, in which case it
      will just choose one at random.
      
      This is useful for two things:
      
       - automatic version naming in Makefiles, for example. We could use it in
         git itself: when doing "git --version", we could use this to give a
         much more useful description of exactly what version was installed.
      
       - for any random commit (say, you use "gitk <pathname>" or
         "git-whatchanged" to look at what has changed in some file), you can
         figure out what the last version of the repo was. Ie, say I find a bug
         in commit 39ca371c45b04cd50d0974030ae051906fc516b6, I just do:
      
      	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-describe 39ca371c45b04cd50d0974030ae051906fc516b6
      	refs/tags/v2.6.14-rc4-g39ca371c
      
         and I now know that it was _not_ in v2.6.14-rc4, but was presumably in
         v2.6.14-rc5.
      
      The latter is useful when you want to see what "version timeframe" a
      commit happened in.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
      908e5310
  2. 27 12月, 2005 6 次提交
  3. 26 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  4. 24 12月, 2005 13 次提交
  5. 23 12月, 2005 10 次提交
  6. 22 12月, 2005 5 次提交