Skip to content

G
git

李少辉-开发者 / git
与 Fork 源项目一致

从无法访问的项目Fork

通知 2
Star 1
Fork 0
G
git

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 28 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 26 9月, 2014 3 次提交
  5. 20 9月, 2014 13 次提交
  7. 30 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 29 8月, 2014 3 次提交
  11. 27 8月, 2014 3 次提交
  13. 26 8月, 2014 6 次提交
    • J
      checkout -m: attempt merge when deletion of path was staged · 6a143aa2
      由 Jonathan Nieder 提交于 
      twoway_merge() is missing an o->gently check in the case where a file
that needs to be modified is missing from the index but present in the
old and new trees.  As a result, in this case 'git checkout -m' errors
out instead of trying to perform a merge.

Fix it by checking o->gently.  While at it, inline the o->gently check
into reject_merge to prevent future call sites from making the same
mistake.

Noticed by code inspection.  The test for the motivating case was
added by JC.
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      6a143aa2
    • J
      Merge git://github.com/git-l10n/git-po · c285171d
      由 Junio C Hamano 提交于 
      * git://github.com/git-l10n/git-po:
  l10n: de.po: improve message when switching branches
  l10n: de.po: fix typo
  po/TEAMS: Add Catalan team
  l10n: Add Catalan translation
  l10n: fr.po (2257t) update for version 2.1.0
  l10n: sv.po: Update Swedish translation (2257t0f0u)
  l10n: vi.po (2257t): Update translation
  l10n: Updated Bulgarian translation of git (2257t,0f,0u)
  l10n: zh_CN: translations for git v2.1.0-rc0
  l10n: git.pot: v2.1.0 round 1 (38 new, 9 removed)
  l10n: Updated Bulgarian translation of git (2247t,0f,0u)
  l10n: Updated Bulgarian translation of git (2228t,0f,0u)
  l10n: Fix more typos in the Swedish translations
      c285171d
    • J
      git-prompt: do not look for refs/stash in $GIT_DIR · 0fa7f016
      由 Jeff King 提交于 
      Since dd0b72cb (bash prompt: use bash builtins to check stash
state, 2011-04-01), git-prompt checks whether we have a
stash by looking for $GIT_DIR/refs/stash. Generally external
programs should never do this, because they would miss
packed-refs.

That commit claims that packed-refs does not pack
refs/stash, but that is not quite true. It does pack the
ref, but due to a bug, fails to prune the ref. When we fix
that bug, we would want to be doing the right thing here.
Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NRonnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      0fa7f016
    • J
      fast-import: fix buffer overflow in dump_tags · c2527859
      由 Jeff King 提交于 
      When creating a new annotated tag, we sprintf the refname
into a static-sized buffer. If we have an absurdly long
tagname, like:

  git init repo &&
  cd repo &&
  git commit --allow-empty -m foo &&
  git tag -m message mytag &&
  git fast-export mytag |
  perl -lpe '/^tag/ and s/mytag/"a" x 8192/e' |
  git fast-import <input

we'll overflow the buffer. We can fix it by using a strbuf.
Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NRonnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      c2527859
    • J
      fast-import: clean up pack_data pointer in end_packfile · 3c078b9c
      由 Jeff King 提交于 
      We have a global pointer pack_data pointing to the current
pack we have open. Inside end_packfile we have two new
pointers, old_p and new_p. The latter points to pack_data,
and the former points to the new "installed" version of the
packfile we get when we hand the file off to the regular
sha1_file machinery. When then free old_p.

Presumably the extra old_p pointer was there so that we
could overwrite pack_data with new_p and still free old_p,
but we don't do that. We just leave pack_data pointing to
bogus memory, and don't overwrite it until we call
start_packfile again (if ever).

This can cause problems for our die routine, which calls
end_packfile to clean things up. If we die at the wrong
moment, we can end up looking at invalid memory in
pack_data left after the last end_packfile().

Instead, let's make sure we set pack_data to NULL after we
free it, and make calling endfile() again with a NULL
pack_data a noop (there is nothing to end).

We can further make things less confusing by dropping old_p
entirely, and moving new_p closer to its point of use.
Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: NRonnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      3c078b9c
    • J
      pack-refs: prune top-level refs like "refs/foo" · afd11d3e
      由 Jeff King 提交于 
      After we have packed all refs, we prune any loose refs that
correspond to what we packed. We do so by first taking a
lock with lock_ref_sha1, and then deleting the loose ref
file.

However, lock_ref_sha1 will refuse to take a lock on any
refs that exist at the top-level of the "refs/" directory,
and we skip pruning the ref.  This is almost certainly not
what we want to happen here. The criteria to be pruned
should not differ from that to be packed; if a ref makes it
to prune_ref, it's because we want it both packed and
pruned (if there are refs you do not want to be packed, they
should be omitted much earlier by pack_ref_is_possible,
which we do in this case if --all is not given).

We can fix this by switching to lock_any_ref_for_update.
This behaves exactly the same with the exception of this
top-level check.
Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NRonnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      afd11d3e
  15. 24 8月, 2014 2 次提交
  17. 23 8月, 2014 3 次提交
  19. 21 8月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      intersect_paths: respect mode in git's tree-sort · e09867f0
      由 Jeff King 提交于 
      When we do a combined diff, we individually diff against
each parent, and then use intersect_paths to do a parallel
walk through the sorted results and come up with a final
list of interesting paths.

The sort order here is that returned by the diffs, which
means it is in git's tree-order which sorts sub-trees as if
their paths have "/" at the end. When we do our parallel
walk, we need to use a comparison function which provides
the same order.

Since 8518ff8f (combine-diff: optimize combine_diff_path sets
intersection, 2014-01-20), we use a simple strcmp to
compare the pathnames, and get this wrong. It's somewhat
hard to trigger because normally a diff does not produce
tree entries at all, and therefore the sort order is the
same as a strcmp. However, if the "-t" option is used with
the diff, then we will produce diff_filepairs for both trees
and files.

We can use base_name_compare to do the comparison, just as
the tree-diff code does. Even though what we have are not
technically base names (they are full paths within the
tree), the end result is the same (we do not care about
interior slashes at all, only about the final character).

However, since we do not have the length of each path
stored, we take a slight shortcut: if neither of the entries
is a sub-tree then the comparison is equivalent to a strcmp.
This lets us skip the extra strlen calls in the common case
without having to reimplement base_name_compare from
scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
      e09867f0
  21. 20 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  23. 19 8月, 2014 2 次提交
  25. 16 8月, 2014 1 次提交