- 04 4月, 2007 7 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When defined, this allows plumbing commands that update the index (add, apply, checkout-index, merge-recursive, mv, read-tree, rm, update-index, and write-tree) to write their resulting index to an alternative index file while holding a lock to the original index file. With this, git-commit that jumps the index does not have to make an extra copy of the index file, and more importantly, it can do the update while holding the lock on the index. However, I think the interface to let an environment variable specify the output is a mistake, as shown in the documentation. If a curious user has the environment variable set to something other than the file GIT_INDEX_FILE points at, almost everything will break. This should instead be a command line parameter to tell these plumbing commands to write the result in the named file, to prevent stupid mistakes. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Not that this release really matters, as we will be doing 1.5.1 tomorrow. This commit is to tie the loose ends and merge all of "maint" branch into "master" in preparation. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Jakub Narebski 提交于
Mainly consistent usage of "git command" and not "git-command" syntax Signed-off-by: NJakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When a file has more then one conflicting hunks, it repeated the contents of previous hunks in output for later ones. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
- 03 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
- 01 4月, 2007 3 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Lichtenheld 提交于
The git-cvsserver documentation claims that the server will set -k modes if appropriate which is not really the case. On the other hand the available gitcvs.allbinary variable is not documented at all. Fix both these issues by rewording the related paragraph. Signed-off-by: NFrank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Eric Wong 提交于
If we're on an invalid HEAD, we should detect this and avoid attempting to continue. Signed-off-by: NEric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Alex Riesen 提交于
This patch leaves the base name in the resulting intermediate tree, to propagate the conflict from intermediate merges up to the top-level merge. Signed-off-by: NAlex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
- 31 3月, 2007 6 次提交
-
-
由 Julian Phillips 提交于
Add a simple script to create a working directory that uses symlinks to point at an exisiting repository. This allows having different branches in different working directories but all from the same repository. Based on a description from Junio of how he creates multiple working directories[1]. With the following caveat: "This risks confusion for an uninitiated if you update a ref that is checked out in another working tree, but modulo that caveat it works reasonably well." [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/41513/Signed-off-by: NJulian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Andy Parkins 提交于
The update hook is no longer the correct place to generate emails; there is now the hooks/post-receive script which is run automatically after a ref has been updated. This patch is to make use of that new location, and to address some faults in the old update hook. The primary problem in the conversion was that in the update hook, the ref has not actually been changed, but is about to be. In the post-receive hook the ref has already been updated. That meant that where we previously had lines like: git rev-list --not --all would now give the wrong list because "--all" in the post-receive hook includes the ref that we are making the email for. This made it more difficult to show only the new revisions added by this update. The solution is not pretty; however it does work and doesn't need any changes to git-rev-list itself. It also fixes (more accurately: reduces the likelihood of) a nasty race when another update occurs while this script is running. The solution, in short, looks like this (see the source code for a longer explanation) git rev-parse --not --all | grep -v $(git rev-parse $refname) | git rev-list --pretty --stdin $oldrev..$newrev This uses git-rev-parse followed by grep to filter out the revision of the ref in question before it gets to rev-list and inhibits the output of itself. By using $(git rev-parse $revname) rather than $newrev as the filter, it also takes care of the situation where another update to the same ref has been made since $refname was $newrev. The second problem that is addressed is that of tags inhibiting the correct output of an update email. Consider this, with somebranch and sometag pointing at the same revision: git push origin somebranch git push origin sometag That would work fine; the push of the branch would generate an email containing all the new commits introduced by the update, then the push of the tag would generate the shortlog formatted tag email. Now consider: git push origin sometag git push origin somebranch When some branch comes to run its "--not --all" line, it will find sometag, and filter those commits from the email - leaving nothing. That meant that those commits would not show (in full) on any email. The fix is to not use "--all", and instead use "--branches" in the git-rev-parse command. Other changes * Lose the monstrous one-giant-script layout and put things in easy to digest functions. This makes it much easier to find the place you need to change if you wanted to customise the output. I've also tried to write more verbose comments for the same reason. The hook script is big, mainly because of all the different cases that it has to handle, so being easy to navigate is important. * All uses of "git-command" changed to "git command", to cope better if a user decided not to install all the hard links to git; * Cleaned up some of the English in the email * The fact that the receive hook makes the ref available also allows me to use Shawn Pearce's fantastic suggestion that an annotated tag can be parsed with git-for-each-ref. This removes the potentially non-portable use of "<<<" heredocs and the nasty messing around with "date" to convert numbers of seconds UTC to a real date * Deletions are now caught and notified (briefly) * To help with debugging, I've retained the command line mode from the update hook; but made it so that the output is not emailed, it's just printed to the screen. This could then be redirected if the user wanted * Removed the "Hello" from the beginning of the email - it's just noise, and no one seriously has their day made happier by "friendly" programs * The fact that it doesn't rely on repository state as an indicator any more means that it's far more stable in its output; hopefully the same arguments will always generate the same email - even if the repository changes in the future. This means you can easily recreate an email should you want to. * Included Jim Meyering's envelope sender option for the sendmail call * The hook is now so big that it was inappropriate to copy it to every repository by keeping it in the templates directory. Instead, I've put a comment saying to look in contrib/hooks, and given an example of calling the script from that template hook. The advantage of calling the script residing at some fixed location is that if a future package of git included a bug fixed version of the script, that would be picked up automatically, and the user would not have to notice and manually copy the new hook to every repository that uses it. Signed-off-by: NAndy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Eric Wong 提交于
We ignore errors if the path we're tracking did not exist for a particular revision range, but we still print out warnings telling the user about that. As pointed out by Seth Falcon, this amounts to a lot of warnings that could confuse and worry users. I'm not entirely comfortable completely silencing the warnings, but showing one warning per path that we track should be reasonable. Signed-off-by: NEric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This fixes a problem reported by Randal Schwartz: >I finally tracked down all the (albeit inconsequential) errors I was getting >on both OpenBSD and OSX. It's the warn() function in usage.c. There's >warn(3) in BSD-style distros. It'd take a "great rename" to change it, but if >someone with better C skills than I have could do that, my linker and I would >appreciate it. It was annoying to me, too, when I was doing some mergetool testing on Mac OS X, so here's a fix. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Don Zickus 提交于
Don't translate the patch to UTF-8, instead preserve the data as is. This also reverts a test case that was included in the original patch series. Also allow overwriting the authorship and title information we gather from RFC2822 mail headers with additional in-body headers, which was pointed out by Linus. Signed-off-by: NDon Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Jakub Narebski 提交于
Fix the bug that caused "blobdiff" view called with new style URI for a rename with change diff to be show as new (added) file diff. New style URI for "blobdiff" for rename means with $hash_base ('hb') and $hash_parent_base ('hpb') paramaters denoting tree-ish (usually commit) of a blobs being compared, together with both $file_name ('f') and $file_parent ('fp') parameters. It is done by adding $file_parent ('fp') to the path limiter, meaning that diff command becomes: git diff-tree [options] hpb hb -- fp f Other option would be finding hash of a blob using git_get_hash_by_path subroutine and comparing blobs using git-diff, or using extended SHA-1 syntax and compare blobs using git-diff: git diff [options] hpb:fp hp:f Signed-off-by: NJakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
- 30 3月, 2007 16 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
* maint: git-upload-pack: make sure we close unused pipe ends Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt: fix example in SPECIFYING RANGES. Documentation/git-svnimport.txt: fix typo.
-
由 Francis Daly 提交于
Bryan Wu reported /usr/local/bin/git-quiltimport: 114: Syntax error: Missing '))' Most bourne-ish shells I have here accept x=$((echo x)|cat) but all bourne-ish shells I have here accept x=$( (echo x)|cat) because $(( might mean arithmetic expansion. Signed-off-by: NFrancis Daly <francis@daoine.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Christian Couder 提交于
So we can remove the specific message in "bisect_run". Signed-off-by: NChristian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
git://repo.or.cz/git/mergetool.git由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git/mergetool.git: mergetool: Clean up description of files and prompts for merge resolutions mergetool: Make git-rm quiet when resolving a deleted file conflict mergetool: Add support for Apple Mac OS X's opendiff command mergetool: Fix abort command when resolving symlinks and deleted files mergetool: Remove spurious error message if merge.tool config option not set mergetool: factor out common code mergetool: portability fix: don't use reserved word function mergetool: portability fix: don't assume true is in /bin mergetool: Don't error out in the merge case where the local file is deleted mergetool: Replace use of "echo -n" with printf(1) to be more portable Fix minor formatting issue in man page for git-mergetool
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This fixes complaints from Junio for how messages and prompts are printed when resolving symlink and deleted file merges. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArjen Laarhoven <arjen@yaph.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Create common function check_unchanged(), save_backup() and remove_backup(). Also fix some minor whitespace issues while we're at it. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If the file we are trying to merge resolve is in git-ls-files -u, then skip the file existence test. If the file isn't reported in git-ls-files, then check to see if the file exists or not to give an appropriate error message. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 29 3月, 2007 7 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
Right now, we don't close the read end of the pipe when git-upload-pack runs git-pack-object, so we hang forever (why don't we get SIGALRM?) instead of dying with SIGPIPE if the latter dies, which seems to be the norm if the client disconnects. Thanks to Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> for pointing out where this close() needed to go. This patch has been tested on kernel.org for several weeks and appear to resolve the problem of git-upload-pack processes hanging around forever. Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> (cherry picked from commit 465b3518)
-
由 Gerrit Pape 提交于
Please see http://bugs.debian.org/404795: In git-rev-parse(1), there is an example commit tree, which is used twice. The explanation for this tree is very clear: B and C are commit *parents* to A. However, when the tree is reused as an example in the SPECIFYING RANGES, the manpage author screws up and uses A as a commit *parent* to B and C! I.e., he inverts the tree. And the fact that for this example you need to read the tree backwards is not explained anywhere (and it would be confusing even if it was). Signed-off-by: NGerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Gerrit Pape 提交于
This was noticed by Frederik Schwarzer. SVN's repository by default has trunk, tags/, and branch_es_/. Signed-off-by: NGerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
-