- 16 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Clemens Buchacher 提交于
In case HEAD does not point to a valid commit yet, merge is implemented as a hard reset. This will cause untracked files to be overwritten. Instead, assume the empty tree for HEAD and do a regular merge. An untracked file will cause the merge to abort and do nothing. If no conflicting files are present, the merge will have the same effect as a hard reset. Signed-off-by: NClemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 11 5月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Tay Ray Chuan 提交于
When the user specifies a message, use fmt_merge_msg_shortlog() to append the shortlog. Previously, when a message was specified, we ignored the merge title ("Merge <foo> into <bar>") and shortlog from fmt_merge_msg(). Update the documentation for -m to reflect this too. Signed-off-by: NTay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Tay Ray Chuan 提交于
It is more accurate to call it 'merge_names' instead of 'msg', as it does not contain the final message. Signed-off-by: NTay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Tay Ray Chuan 提交于
ce9d823b (merge: do not add standard message when message is given with -m option) changed the behaviour of the code that the comment addressed, but the comment was not similarly updated. Fix this. Signed-off-by: NTay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 4月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Christian Couder 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Christian Couder 提交于
In the try_merge_strategy() function, when the strategy is "recursive" or "subtree", the merge_recursive() function is called. Otherwise we launch a "git merge-STRATEGY" process. To make it possible to reuse code that launches a "git merge-STRATEGY" process, this patch refactors this code into a new try_merge_command() function. Signed-off-by: NChristian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This shrinks the top-level directory a bit, and makes it much more pleasant to use auto-completion on the thing. Instead of [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab> Display all 180 possibilities? (y or n) [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-sh builtin-shortlog.c builtin-show-branch.c builtin-show-ref.c builtin-shortlog.o builtin-show-branch.o builtin-show-ref.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shor<tab> builtin-shortlog.c builtin-shortlog.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shortlog.c you get [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab> [type] builtin/ builtin.h [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin [auto-completes to] [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sh<tab> [type] shortlog.c shortlog.o show-branch.c show-branch.o show-ref.c show-ref.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sho [auto-completes to] [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shor<tab> [type] shortlog.c shortlog.o [torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shortlog.c which doesn't seem all that different, but not having that annoying break in "Display all 180 possibilities?" is quite a relief. NOTE! If you do this in a clean tree (no object files etc), or using an editor that has auto-completion rules that ignores '*.o' files, you won't see that annoying 'Display all 180 possibilities?' message - it will just show the choices instead. I think bash has some cut-off around 100 choices or something. So the reason I see this is that I'm using an odd editory, and thus don't have the rules to cut down on auto-completion. But you can simulate that by using 'ls' instead, or something similar. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This makes "subtree" more orthogonal to the rest of recursive merge, so that you can use subtree and ours/theirs features at the same time. For example, you can now say: git merge -s subtree -Xtheirs other to merge with "other" branch while shifting it up or down to match the shape of the tree of the current branch, and resolving conflicts favoring the changes "other" branch made over changes made in the current branch. It also allows the prefix used to shift the trees to be specified using the "-Xsubtree=$prefix" option. Giving an empty prefix tells the command to figure out how much to shift trees automatically as we have always done. "merge -s subtree" is the same as "merge -s recursive -Xsubtree=" (or "merge -s recursive -Xsubtree"). Based on an old patch done back in the days when git-merge was a script; Avery ported the script part to builtin-merge.c. Bugs in shift_tree() is mine. Signed-off-by: NAvery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Avery Pennarun 提交于
Teach "-X <option>" command line argument to "git merge" that is passed to strategy implementations. "ours" and "theirs" autoresolution introduced by the previous commit can be asked to the recursive strategy. Signed-off-by: NAvery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 13 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthieu Moy 提交于
Various commands refuse to run in the presence of conflicts (commit, merge, pull, cherry-pick/revert). They all used to provide rough, and inconsistant error messages. A new variable advice.resolveconflict is introduced, and allows more verbose messages, pointing the user to the appropriate solution. For commit, the error message used to look like this: $ git commit foo.txt: needs merge foo.txt: unmerged (c34a92682e0394bc0d6f4d4a67a8e2d32395c169) foo.txt: unmerged (3afcd75de8de0bb5076942fcb17446be50451030) foo.txt: unmerged (c9785d77b76dfe4fb038bf927ee518f6ae45ede4) error: Error building trees The "need merge" line is given by refresh_cache. We add the IN_PORCELAIN option to make the output more consistant with the other porcelain commands, and catch the error in return, to stop with a clean error message. The next lines were displayed by a call to cache_tree_update(), which is not reached anymore if we noticed the conflict. The new output looks like: U foo.txt fatal: 'commit' is not possible because you have unmerged files. Please, fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>' as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit, or use 'git commit -a'. Pull is slightly modified to abort immediately if $GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD exists instead of waiting for merge to complain. The behavior of merge and the test-case are slightly modified to reflect the usual flow: start with conflicts, fix them, and afterwards get rid of MERGE_HEAD, with different error messages at each stage. Signed-off-by: NMatthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 26 12月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When resolving a conflict using "git add" to create a stage #0 entry, or "git rm" to remove entries at higher stages, remove_index_entry_at() function is eventually called to remove unmerged (i.e. higher stage) entries from the index. Introduce a "resolve_undo_info" structure and keep track of the removed cache entries, and save it in a new index extension section in the index_state. Operations like "read-tree -m", "merge", "checkout [-m] <branch>" and "reset" are signs that recorded information in the index is no longer necessary. The data is removed from the index extension when operations start; they may leave conflicted entries in the index, and later user actions like "git add" will record their conflicted states afresh. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Instead of using the low-level index_state interface, use the bog standard active_cache and active_nr macros to access the cache entries when using the default one. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 09 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This reverts commit c0ecb070 "git-pull.sh: Fix call to git-merge for new command format" and commit b81e00a9 "git-merge: a deprecation notice of the ancient command line syntax". They caused a "git pull" (without any arguments, and without any local commits---only to update to the other side) to warn that commit log message is ignored because the merge resulted in a fast-forward. Another possible solution is to add an extra option to "git merge" so that "git pull" can tell it that the message given is not coming from the end user (the canned message is passed just in case the merge resulted in a non-ff and caused commit), but I think it is easier _not_ to deprecate the old syntax. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Introduce a command line option to override rerere.autoupdate configuration variable to make it more useful. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 03 12月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Even if the user explicitly gave her own message to "git merge", the command still added its standard merge message. It resulted in a useless repetition like this: % git merge -m "Merge early part of side branch" `git rev-parse side~2` % git show -s commit 37217141e7519629353738d5e4e677a15096206f Merge: e68e646 a1d2374 Author: しらいし ななこ <nanako3@lavabit.com> Date: Wed Dec 2 14:33:20 2009 +0900 Merge early part of side branch Merge commit 'a1d2374f8f52f4e8a53171601a920b538a6cec23' The gave her own message because she didn't want git to add the standard message (if she wanted to, she wouldn't have given one, or she would have prepared it using git-fmt-merge-msg command). Noticed by Nanako Shiraishi Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
This was misinterpreted as an ancient style "git merge <message> HEAD <commit> <commit>..." that merges one (or more) <commit> into the current branch and record the resulting commit with the given message. Then a later sanity check found that there is no <commit> specified and gave a usage message. Tested-by: NNanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The ancient form of git merge command used in the original sample script has been copied from Linus and are still found everywhere, I think, and people may still have it in their scripts, but on the other hand, it is so unintuitive that even people reasonably familiar with git are surprised by accidentally triggering the support to parse this ancient form. Gently nudge people to upgrade their script to more recent and readable style for eventual removal of the original syntax. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 30 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matthieu Moy 提交于
fadd069d (merge-recursive: give less scary messages when merge did not start, Sep 7 2009) introduced some friendlier error message for merge failure, but the messages were shown only for non-fast forward merges. This patch uses the same for fast-forward. Signed-off-by: NMatthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Avery Pennarun 提交于
We need to call exclude_cmds() after the loop, not during the loop, because excluding a command from the array can change the indexes of objects in the array. The result is that, depending on file ordering, some commands weren't excluded as they should have been. Signed-off-by: NAvery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 11 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Nieder 提交于
Builtins do not need to run setup_worktree() for themselves, since the builtin machinery runs it for them. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 31 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Björn Gustavsson 提交于
For convenience in scripts and aliases, add the option --ff-only to only allow fast-forwards (and up-to-date, despite the name). Disallow combining --ff-only and --no-ff, since they flatly contradict each other. Allow all other options to be combined with --ff-only (i.e. do not add any code to handle them specially), including the following options: * --strategy (one or more): As long as the chosen merge strategy results in up-to-date or fast-forward, the command will succeed. * --squash: I cannot imagine why anyone would want to squash commits only if fast-forward is possible, but I also see no reason why it should not be allowed. * --message: The message will always be ignored, but I see no need to explicitly disallow providing a redundant message. Acknowledgements: I did look at Yuval Kogman's earlier patch (107768 in gmane), mainly as shortcut to find my way in the code, but I did not copy anything directly. Signed-off-by: NBjörn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 25 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Felipe Contreras 提交于
It's a compound word. Signed-off-by: NFelipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 20 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Rast 提交于
pretty_print_commit() has a bunch of rarely-used arguments, and introducing more of them requires yet another update of all the call sites. Refactor most of them into a struct to make future extensions easier. The ones that stay "plain" arguments were chosen on the grounds that all callers put real arguments there, whereas some callers have 0/NULL for all arguments that were factored into the struct. We declare the struct 'const' to ensure none of the callers are bitten by the changed (no longer call-by-value) semantics. Signed-off-by: NThomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 8月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
Previously when merging directly from a local tracking branch like: git merge origin/master The merge message said: Merge commit 'origin/master' * commit 'origin/master': ... Instead, let's be more explicit about what we are merging: Merge remote branch 'origin/master' * origin/master: ... We accomplish this by recognizing remote tracking branches in git-merge when we build the simulated FETCH_HEAD output that we feed to fmt-merge-msg. In addition to a new test in t7608, we have to tweak the expected output of t3409, which does such a merge. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
If we have both a tag and a branch named "foo", then calling "git merge foo" will warn about the ambiguous ref, but merge the tag. When generating the commit message, though, we simply checked whether "refs/heads/foo" existed, and if it did, assumed it was a branch. This led to the statement "Merge branch 'foo'" in the commit message, which is quite wrong. Instead, we should use dwim_ref to find the actual ref used, and describe it appropriately. In addition to the test in t7608, we must also tweak the expected output of t4202, which was accidentally triggering this bug. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 06 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Sixt 提交于
As a general guideline, functions in git's code return zero to indicate success and negative values to indicate failure. The run_command family of functions followed this guideline. But there are actually two different kinds of failure: - failures of system calls; - non-zero exit code of the program that was run. Usually, a non-zero exit code of the program is a failure and means a failure to the caller. Except that sometimes it does not. For example, the exit code of merge programs (e.g. external merge drivers) conveys information about how the merge failed, and not all exit calls are actually failures. Furthermore, the return value of run_command is sometimes used as exit code by the caller. This change arranges that the exit code of the program is returned as a positive value, which can now be regarded as the "result" of the function. System call failures continue to be reported as negative values. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 28 6月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Rast 提交于
Lots of die() calls did not actually report the kind of error, which can leave the user confused as to the real problem. Use die_errno() where we check a system/library call that sets errno on failure, or one of the following that wrap such calls: Function Passes on error from -------- -------------------- odb_pack_keep open read_ancestry fopen read_in_full xread strbuf_read xread strbuf_read_file open or strbuf_read_file strbuf_readlink readlink write_in_full xwrite Signed-off-by: NThomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Thomas Rast 提交于
Change calls to die(..., strerror(errno)) to use the new die_errno(). In the process, also make slight style adjustments: at least state _something_ about the function that failed (instead of just printing the pathname), and put paths in single quotes. Signed-off-by: NThomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 21 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
There are a few remaining ones, but this fixes the trivial ones. It boils down to two main issues that sparse complains about: - warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Sparse doesn't like you using '0' instead of 'NULL'. For various good reasons, not the least of which is just the visual confusion. A NULL pointer is not an integer, and that whole "0 works as NULL" is a historical accident and not very pretty. A few of these remain: zlib is a total mess, and Z_NULL is just a 0. I didn't touch those. - warning: symbol 'xyz' was not declared. Should it be static? Sparse wants to see declarations for any functions you export. A lack of a declaration tends to mean that you should either add one, or you should mark the function 'static' to show that it's in file scope. A few of these remain: I only did the ones that should obviously just be made static. That 'wt_status_submodule_summary' one is debatable. It has a few related flags (like 'wt_status_use_color') which _are_ declared, and are used by builtin-commit.c. So maybe we'd like to export it at some point, but it's not declared now, and not used outside of that file, so 'static' it is in this patch. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 02 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Clemens Buchacher 提交于
The following is an easy mistake to make for users coming from version control systems with an "update and commit"-style workflow. 1. git pull 2. resolve conflicts 3. git pull Step 3 overrides MERGE_HEAD, starting a new merge with dirty index. IOW, probably not what the user intended. Instead, refuse to merge again if a merge is in progress. Reported-by: NDave Olszewski <cxreg@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NClemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 25 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Boyd 提交于
To give OPT_FILENAME the prefix, we pass the prefix to parse_options() which passes the prefix to parse_options_start() which sets the prefix member of parse_opts_ctx accordingly. If there isn't a prefix in the calling context, passing NULL will suffice. Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 28 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Allan Caffee 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAllan Caffee <allan.caffee@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMiklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The function takes a user-supplied string that is supposed to be a branch name, and puts it in a strbuf after expanding possible shorthand notation. A handful of open coded sequence to do this in the existing code have been changed to use this helper function. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
These allow you to say "git checkout @{-2}" to switch to the branch two "branch switching" ago by pretending as if you typed the name of that branch. As it is likely that we will be introducing more short-hands to write the name of a branch without writing it explicitly, rename the functions from "nth_last_branch" to more generic "branch_name", to prepare for different semantics. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Schindelin 提交于
By having flags represented as bits in the new member variable 'flags', it will be easier to use parse_options when dir_struct is involved. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
1.6.2 will have @{-1} syntax advertised as "usable anywhere you can use a branch name". However, "git merge @{-1}" did not work. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 05 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Potashev 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Potashev <aspotashev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephan Beyer 提交于
A function that runs a hook is used in several Git commands. builtin-commit.c has the one that is most general for cases without piping. The one in builtin-gc.c prints some useful warnings. This patch moves a merged version of these variants into libgit and lets the other builtins use this libified run_hook(). The run_hook() function used in receive-pack.c feeds the standard input of the pre-receive or post-receive hooks. This function is renamed to run_receive_hook() because the libified run_hook() cannot handle this. Mentored-by: NDaniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Mentored-by: NChristian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: NStephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 05 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Riesen 提交于
So that full filesystem conditions or permissions problems won't go unnoticed. Signed-off-by: NAlex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tuncer Ayaz 提交于
Implement git-pull --quiet and git-pull --verbose by adding the options to git-pull and fixing verbosity handling in git-fetch. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-