- 17 5月, 2013 8 次提交
-
-
由 Kevin Bracey 提交于
Previously, the default history treated bottom commits the same as any other UNINTERESTING commit, which could force it down side branches. Consider the following history: *A--*B---D--*F * marks !TREESAME parent paths \ /* `-C-' When requesting "B..F", B is UNINTERESTING but TREESAME to D. C is !UNINTERESTING. So default following would go from D into the irrelevant side branch C to A, rather than to B. Note also that if there had been an extra !UNINTERESTING commit B1 between B and D, it wouldn't have gone down C. Change the default following to test relevant_commit() instead of !UNINTERESTING, so it can proceed straight from D to B, thus finishing the traversal of that path. Signed-off-by: NKevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Kevin Bracey 提交于
When using --parents or --children, get_commit_action() previously showed all merges, even if TREESAME to both parents. This was intended to tie together the topology of the rewritten parents, but it was excessive - in fact we only need to show merges that have two or more relevant parents. Merges at the boundary do not necessarily need to be shown. Signed-off-by: NKevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Kevin Bracey 提交于
Use the BOTTOM flag to define relevance for pruning. Relevant commits are those that are !UNINTERESTING or BOTTOM, and this allows us to identify irrelevant side branches (UNINTERESTING && !BOTTOM). If a merge has relevant parents, and it is TREESAME to them, then do not let irrelevant parents cause the merge to be treated as !TREESAME. When considering simplification, don't always include all merges - merges with exactly one relevant parent can be simplified, if TREESAME according to the above rule. These two changes greatly increase simplification in limited, pruned revision lists. Signed-off-by: NKevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Kevin Bracey 提交于
When performing edge-based operations on the revision graph, it can be useful to be able to identify the INTERESTING graph's connection(s) to the bottom commit(s) specified by the user. Conceptually when the user specifies "A..B" (== B ^A), they are asking for the history from A to B. The first connection from A onto the INTERESTING graph is part of that history, and should be considered. If we consider only INTERESTING nodes and their connections, then we're really only considering the history from A's immediate descendants to B. This patch does not change behaviour, but adds a new BOTTOM flag to indicate the bottom commits specified by the user, ready to be used by following patches. We immediately use the BOTTOM flag to return collect_bottom_commits() to its original approach of examining the pending commit list rather than the command line. This will ensure alignment of the definition of "bottom" with future patches. Signed-off-by: NKevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Kevin Bracey 提交于
Reimplement commit 4b7f53da on top of the new simplify-merges infrastructure, tightening the condition to only consider root parents; the original version incorrectly dropped parents that were TREESAME to anything. Original log message follows. The merge simplification rule stated in 6546b593 (revision traversal: show full history with merge simplification, 2008-07-31) still treated merge commits too specially. Namely, in a history with this shape: ---o---o---M / x---x---x where three 'x' were on a history completely unrelated to the main history 'o' and do not touch any of the paths we are following, we still said that after simplifying all of the parents of M, 'x' (which is the leftmost 'x' that rightmost 'x simplifies down to) and 'o' (which would be the last commit on the main history that touches the paths we are following) are independent from each other, and both need to be kept. That is incorrect; when the side branch 'x' never touches the paths, it should be removed to allow M to simplify down to the last commit on the main history that touches the paths. Suggested-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Kevin Bracey 提交于
When simplifying an odd merge, such as one that used "-s ours", we may find ourselves TREESAME to apparently redundant parents. Prevent simplify_merges() from removing every TREESAME parent; if this would happen reinstate the first TREESAME parent - the one that the default log would have followed. This avoids producing a totally disjoint history from the default log when the default log is a better explanation of the end result, and aids visualisation of odd merges. Signed-off-by: NKevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Kevin Bracey 提交于
History simplification previously always treated merges as TREESAME if they were TREESAME to any parent. While this was consistent with the default behaviour, this could be extremely unhelpful when searching detailed history, and could not be overridden. For example, if a merge had ignored a change, as if by "-s ours", then: git log -m -p --full-history -Schange file would successfully locate "change"'s addition but would not locate the merge that resolved against it. Futher, simplify_merges could drop the actual parent that a commit was TREESAME to, leaving it as a normal commit marked TREESAME that isn't actually TREESAME to its remaining parent. Now redefine a commit's TREESAME flag to be true only if a commit is TREESAME to _all_ of its parents. This doesn't affect either the default simplify_history behaviour (because partially TREESAME merges are turned into normal commits), or full-history with parent rewriting (because all merges are output). But it does affect other modes. The clearest difference is that --full-history will show more merges - sufficient to ensure that -m -p --full-history log searches can really explain every change to the file, including those changes' ultimate fate in merges. Also modify simplify_merges to recalculate TREESAME after removing a parent. This is achieved by storing per-parent TREESAME flags on the initial scan, so the combined flag can be easily recomputed. This fixes some t6111 failures, but creates a couple of new ones - we are now showing some merges that don't need to be shown. Signed-off-by: NKevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Kevin Bracey 提交于
The documentation assures users that "A...B" is defined as "A B --not $(git merge-base --all A B)". This wasn't in fact quite true, because the calculated merge bases were not sent to add_rev_cmdline(). The main effect of this was that although git rev-list --ancestry-path A B --not $(git merge-base --all A B) worked, the simpler form git rev-list --ancestry-path A...B failed with a "no bottom commits" error. Other potential users of bottom commits could also be affected by this problem, if they examine revs->cmdline_info; I came across the issue in my proposed history traversal refinements series. So ensure that the calculated merge bases are sent to add_rev_cmdline(), flagged with new 'whence' enum value REV_CMD_MERGE_BASE. Signed-off-by: NKevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
The commit encoding is parsed by logmsg_reencode, there's no need for the caller to re-parse it again. The reencoded message now has the new encoding, not the original one. The caller would need to read commit object again before parsing. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Rast 提交于
read_revisions_from_stdin() has passed pointers to its read buffer down to handle_revision_arg() since its inception way back in 42cabc34 (Teach rev-list an option to read revs from the standard input., 2006-09-05). Even back then, this was a bug: through add_pending_object, the argument was recorded in the object_array's 'name' field. Fix it by making a copy whenever read_revisions_from_stdin() passes an argument down the callchain. The other caller runs handle_revision_arg() on argv[], where it would be redundant to make a copy. Signed-off-by: NThomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 09 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Kevin Bracey reports that the change regresses a case shown in the user manual. Trading one fix with another breakage is not worth it. Just keep the test to document the existing breakage, and revert the change for now. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kacper Kornet 提交于
Logic in still_interesting function allows to stop the commits traversing if the oldest processed commit is not older then the youngest commit on the list to process and the list contains only commits marked as not interesting ones. It can be premature when dealing with a set of coequal commits. For example git rev-list A^! --not B provides wrong answer if all commits in the range A..B had the same commit time and there are more then 7 of them. To fix this problem the relevant part of the logic in still_interesting is changed to: the walk can be stopped if the oldest processed commit is younger then the youngest commit on the list to processed. Signed-off-by: NKacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 12 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
If you run "git log --grep=foo", we will run your regex on the literal bytes of the commit message. This can provide confusing results if the commit message is not in the same encoding as your grep expression (or worse, you have commits in multiple encodings, in which case your regex would need to be written to match either encoding). On top of this, we might also be grepping in the commit's notes, which are already re-encoded, potentially leading to grepping in a buffer with mixed encodings concatenated. This is insanity, but most people never noticed, because their terminal and their commit encodings all match. Instead, let's massage the to-be-grepped commit into a standardized encoding. There is not much point in adding a flag for "this is the encoding I expect my grep pattern to match"; the only sane choice is for it to use the log output encoding. That is presumably what the user's terminal is using, and it means that the patterns found by the grep will match the output produced by git. As a bonus, this fixes a potential segfault in commit_match when commit->buffer is NULL, as we now build on logmsg_reencode, which handles reading the commit buffer from disk if necessary. The segfault can be triggered with: git commit -m 'text1' --allow-empty git commit -m 'text2' --allow-empty git log --graph --no-walk --grep 'text2' which arguably does not make any sense (--graph inherently wants a connected history, and by --no-walk the command line is telling us to show discrete points in history without connectivity), and we probably should forbid the combination, but that is a separate issue. Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The merge simplification rule stated in 6546b593 (revision traversal: show full history with merge simplification, 2008-07-31) still treated merge commits too specially. Namely, in a history with this shape: ---o---o---M / x---x---x where three 'x' were on a history completely unrelated to the main history 'o' and do not touch any of the paths we are following, we still said that after simplifying all of the parents of M, 'x' (which is the leftmost 'x' that rightmost 'x simplifies down to) and 'o' (which would be the last commit on the main history that touches the paths we are following) are independent from each other, and both need to be kept. That is incorrect; when the side branch 'x' never touches the paths, it should be removed to allow M to simplify down to the last commit on the main history that touches the paths. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 11 1月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When we taught the commit_match() mechanism to pay attention to the new --use-mailmap option, we started to unconditionally copy the commit object to a temporary buffer, just in case we need the author and committer lines updated via the mailmap mechanism, and rewrite author and committer using the mailmap. It turns out that this has a rather unpleasant performance implications. In the linux kernel repository, running $ git log --author='Junio C Hamano' --pretty=short >/dev/null under /usr/bin/time, with and without --use-mailmap (the .mailmap file is 118 entries long, the particular author does not appear in it), cost (with warm cache): [without --use-mailmap] 5.42user 0.26system 0:05.70elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2005936maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+137669minor)pagefaults 0swaps [with --use-mailmap] 6.47user 0.30system 0:06.78elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2006288maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+137692minor)pagefaults 0swaps which incurs about 20% overhead. The command is doing extra work, so the extra cost may be justified. But it is inexcusable to pay the cost when we do not need author/committer match. In the same repository, $ git log --grep='fix menuconfig on debian lenny' --pretty=short >/dev/null shows very similar numbers as the above: [without --use-mailmap] 5.32user 0.30system 0:05.63elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2005984maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+137672minor)pagefaults 0swaps [with --use-mailmap] 6.64user 0.24system 0:06.89elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2006320maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+137694minor)pagefaults 0swaps The latter case is an unnecessary performance regression. We may want to _show_ the result with mailmap applied, but we do not have to copy and rewrite the author/committer of all commits we try to match if we do not query for these fields. Trivially optimize this performace regression by limiting the rewrites for only when we are matching with author/committer fields. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Antoine Pelisse 提交于
Currently you can use mailmap to display log authors and committers but you can't use the mailmap to find commits with mapped values. This commit allows you to run: git log --use-mailmap --author mapped_name_or_email git log --use-mailmap --committer mapped_name_or_email Of course it only works if the --use-mailmap option is used. The new name and email are copied only when necessary. Signed-off-by: NAntoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 18 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
We either stuff the notes message without modification for %N userformat, or format it for human consumption. Using two bits is an overkill that does not benefit anybody. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 10月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
When we added the "--perl-regexp" option (or "-P") to "git grep", we should have done the same for the commands in the "git log" family, but somehow we forgot to do so. This corrects it, but we will reserve the short-and-sweet "-P" option for something else for now. Also introduce the "--basic-regexp" option for completeness, so that the "last one wins" principle can be used to defeat an earlier -E option, e.g. "git log -E --basic-regexp --grep='<bre>'". Note that it cannot have the short "-G" option as the option is to grep in the patch text in the context of "log" family. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The command line option parser for "git log -F -E --grep='<ere>'" did not flip the "fixed" bit, violating the general "last option wins" principle among conflicting options. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Instead of using the hand-rolled initialization sequence, use grep_init() to populate the necessary bits. This opens the door to allow the calling commands to optionally read grep.* configuration variables via git_config() if they want to. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 30 9月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Notes are shown after commit body. From user perspective it looks pretty much like commit body and they may assume --grep would search in that part too. Make it so. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 提交于
Similar to --author/--committer which filters commits by author and committer header fields. --grep-reflog adds a fake "reflog" header to commit and a grep filter to search on that line. All rules to --author/--committer apply except no timestamp stripping. Signed-off-by: NNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 15 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Our "grep" allows complex boolean expressions to be formed to match each individual line with operators like --and, '(', ')' and --not. Introduce the "--debug" option to show the parse tree to help people who want to debug and enhance it. Also "log" learns "--grep-debug" option to do the same. The command line parser to the log family is a lot more limited than the general "git grep" parser, but it has special handling for header matching (e.g. "--author"), and a parse tree is valuable when working on it. Note that "--all-match" is *not* any individual node in the parse tree. It is an instruction to the evaluator to check all the nodes in the top-level backbone have matched and reject a document as non-matching otherwise. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin von Zweigbergk 提交于
When 'git log' is passed the --no-walk option, no revision walk takes place, naturally. Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, however, the provided revisions still get sorted by commit date. So e.g 'git log --no-walk HEAD HEAD~1' and 'git log --no-walk HEAD~1 HEAD' give the same result (unless the two revisions share the commit date, in which case they will retain the order given on the command line). As the commit that introduced --no-walk (8e64006e (Teach revision machinery about --no-walk, 2007-07-24)) points out, the sorting is intentional, to allow things like git log --abbrev-commit --pretty=oneline --decorate --all --no-walk to show all refs in order by commit date. But there are also other cases where the sorting is not wanted, such as <command producing revisions in order> | git log --oneline --no-walk --stdin To accomodate both cases, leave the decision of whether or not to sort up to the caller, by allowing --no-walk={sorted,unsorted}, defaulting to 'sorted' for backward-compatibility reasons. Signed-off-by: NMartin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 24 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Either end of revision range operator can be omitted to default to HEAD, as in "origin.." (what did I do since I forked) or "..origin" (what did they do since I forked). But the current parser interprets ".." as an empty range "HEAD..HEAD", and worse yet, because ".." does exist on the filesystem, we get this annoying output: $ cd Documentation/howto $ git log .. ;# give me recent commits that touch Documentation/ area. fatal: ambiguous argument '..': both revision and filename Use '--' to separate filenames from revisions Surely we could say "git log ../" or even "git log -- .." to disambiguate, but we shouldn't have to. Helped-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Rast 提交于
diff_setup_done() has historically returned an error code, but lost the last nonzero return in 943d5b73 (allow diff.renamelimit to be set regardless of -M/-C, 2006-08-09). The callers were in a pretty confused state: some actually checked for the return code, and some did not. Let it return void, and patch all callers to take this into account. This conveniently also gets rid of a handful of different(!) error messages that could never be triggered anyway. Note that the function can still die(). Signed-off-by: NThomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 30 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
The diff code represents paths using the diff_filespec struct. This struct has a sha1 to represent the sha1 of the content at that path, as well as a sha1_valid member which indicates whether its sha1 field is actually useful. If sha1_valid is not true, then the filespec represents a working tree file (e.g., for the no-index case, or for when the index is not up-to-date). The diff_filespec is only used internally, though. At the interfaces to the diff subsystem, callers feed the sha1 directly, and we create a diff_filespec from it. It's at that point that we look at the sha1 and decide whether it is valid or not; callers may pass the null sha1 as a sentinel value to indicate that it is not. We should not typically see the null sha1 coming from any other source (e.g., in the index itself, or from a tree). However, a corrupt tree might have a null sha1, which would cause "diff --patch" to accidentally diff the working tree version of a file instead of treating it as a blob. This patch extends the edges of the diff interface to accept a "sha1_valid" flag whenever we accept a sha1, and to use that flag when creating a filespec. In some cases, this means passing the flag through several layers, making the code change larger than would be desirable. One alternative would be to simply die() upon seeing corrupted trees with null sha1s. However, this fix more directly addresses the problem (while bogus sha1s in a tree are probably a bad thing, it is really the sentinel confusion sending us down the wrong code path that is what makes it devastating). And it means that git is more capable of examining and debugging these corrupted trees. For example, you can still "diff --raw" such a tree to find out when the bogus entry was introduced; you just cannot do a "--patch" diff (just as you could not with any other corrupted tree, as we do not have any content to diff). Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff King 提交于
During a revision traversal in which --max-count has been specified, we decrement a counter for each revision returned by get_revision. When it hits 0, we typically return NULL (the exception being if we still have boundary commits to show). However, before we check the counter, we call get_revision_1 to get the next commit. This might involve looking at a large number of commits if we have restricted the traversal (e.g., we might traverse until we find the next commit whose diff actually matches a pathspec). There's no need to make this get_revision_1 call when our counter runs out. If we are not in --boundary mode, we will just throw away the result and immediately return NULL. If we are in --boundary mode, then we will still throw away the result, and then start showing the boundary commits. However, as git_revision_1 does not impact the boundary list, it should not have an impact. In most cases, avoiding this work will not be especially noticeable. However, in some cases, it can make a big difference: [before] $ time git rev-list -1 origin Documentation/RelNotes/1.7.11.2.txt 8d141a1d real 0m0.301s user 0m0.280s sys 0m0.016s [after] $ time git rev-list -1 origin Documentation/RelNotes/1.7.11.2.txt 8d141a1d real 0m0.010s user 0m0.008s sys 0m0.000s Note that the output is produced almost instantaneously in the first case, and then git uselessly spends a long time looking for the next commit to touch that file (but there isn't one, and we traverse all the way down to the roots). Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Add a field to setup_revision_opt structure and allow these callers to tell the setup_revisions command parsing machinery that short SHA1 it encounters are meant to name committish. This step does not go all the way to connect the setup_revisions() to sha1_name.c yet. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The existing "cant_be_filename" that tells the function that the caller knows the arg is not a path (hence it does not have to be checked for absense of the file whose name matches it) is made into a bit in the flag word. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Many callers know that the user meant to name a committish by syntactical positions where the object name appears. Calling this function allows the machinery to disambiguate shorter-than-unique abbreviated object names between committish and others. Note that this does NOT error out when the named object is not a committish. It is merely to give a hint to the disambiguation machinery. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The function takes user input string and returns the object name (binary SHA-1) with mode bits and path when the object was looked up in a tree. Additionally give hints to help disambiguation of abbreviated object names when the caller knows what it is looking for. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 04 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
There are only two callers, and they will benefit from being able to pass disambiguation hints to underlying get_sha1_with_context() API once it happens. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 19 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthieu Moy 提交于
verify_filename() can be called in two different contexts. Either we just tried to interpret a string as an object name, and it fails, so we try looking for a working tree file (i.e. we finished looking at revs that come earlier on the command line, and the next argument must be a pathname), or we _know_ that we are looking for a pathname, and shouldn't even try interpreting the string as an object name. For example, with this change, we get: $ git log COPYING HEAD:inexistant fatal: HEAD:inexistant: no such path in the working tree. Use '-- <path>...' to specify paths that do not exist locally. $ git log HEAD:inexistant fatal: Path 'inexistant' does not exist in 'HEAD' Signed-off-by: NMatthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 14 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The simplify_merges() function needs to look at all history chain to find the closest ancestor that is relevant after the simplification, but after --first-parent traversal, side parents haven't been marked for relevance (they are irrelevant by definition due to the nature of first-parent-only traversal) nor culled from the parents list of resulting commits. We cannot simply remove these side parents from the parents list, as the output phase still wants to see the parents. Instead, teach simplify_one() and its callees to ignore the later parents. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 09 6月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
Among the three similar-looking loops that walk singly linked commit_list, the first one is only peeking and the same list is later used for real work. Leave a comment not to mistakenly free its elements there. Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
由 Junio C Hamano 提交于
The code internally runs sort_in_topo_order() already; it is more clear to spell it out in the option parsing phase, instead of adding a special case in simplify_merges() function.
-
- 26 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 René Scharfe 提交于
By using commit_list_insert(), we added new items to the top of the list and, since this is not the order we want, reversed it afterwards. Simplify this process by adding new items at the bottom instead, getting rid of the reversal step. Signed-off-by: NRene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
- 16 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Clemens Buchacher 提交于
If a commit-ish passed to cherry-pick or revert happens to have a file of the same name, git complains that the argument is ambiguous and advises to use '--'. To make things worse, the '--' argument is removed by parse_options, und so passing '--' has no effect. Instead, always interpret cherry-pick/revert arguments as revisions. Signed-off-by: NClemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-