提交 fbc90123 编写于 作者: J Junio C Hamano

Do not merge random set of refs out of wildcarded refs

When your fetch configuration has only the wildcards, we would
pick the lexicographically first ref from the remote side for
merging, which was complete nonsense.  Make sure nothing except
the one that is specified with branch.*.merge is merged in this
case.
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
上级 63c97ce2
......@@ -76,16 +76,32 @@ get_remote_default_refs_for_push () {
# from get_remote_refs_for_fetch when it deals with refspecs
# supplied on the command line. $ls_remote_result has the list
# of refs available at remote.
#
# The first token returned is either "explicit" or "glob"; this
# is to help prevent randomly "globbed" ref from being chosen as
# a merge candidate
expand_refs_wildcard () {
first_one=yes
for ref
do
lref=${ref#'+'}
# a non glob pattern is given back as-is.
expr "z$lref" : 'zrefs/.*/\*:refs/.*/\*$' >/dev/null || {
if test -n "$first_one"
then
echo "explicit"
first_one=
fi
echo "$ref"
continue
}
# glob
if test -n "$first_one"
then
echo "glob"
first_one=
fi
from=`expr "z$lref" : 'z\(refs/.*/\)\*:refs/.*/\*$'`
to=`expr "z$lref" : 'zrefs/.*/\*:\(refs/.*/\)\*$'`
local_force=
......@@ -116,7 +132,8 @@ canon_refs_list_for_fetch () {
if test "$1" = "-d"
then
shift ; remote="$1" ; shift
set x $(expand_refs_wildcard "$@")
set $(expand_refs_wildcard "$@")
is_explicit="$1"
shift
if test "$remote" = "$(get_default_remote)"
then
......@@ -125,6 +142,10 @@ canon_refs_list_for_fetch () {
merge_branches=$(git-repo-config \
--get-all "branch.${curr_branch}.merge")
fi
if test -z "$merge_branches" && test $is_explicit != explicit
then
merge_branches=..this.will.never.match.any.ref..
fi
fi
for ref
do
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册