提交 f8a9d428 编写于 作者: J Junio C Hamano

read-tree: further loosen "working file will be lost" check.

This follows up commit ed93b449 where we removed overcautious
"working file will be lost" check.

A new option "--exclude-per-directory=.gitignore" can be used to
tell the "git-read-tree" command that the user does not mind
losing contents in untracked files in the working tree, if they
need to be overwritten by a merge (either a two-way "switch
branches" merge, or a three-way merge).
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
上级 8ebe185b
......@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include "tree-walk.h"
#include "cache-tree.h"
#include "unpack-trees.h"
#include "dir.h"
#include "builtin.h"
static struct object_list *trees;
......@@ -178,6 +179,23 @@ int cmd_read_tree(int argc, const char **argv, const char *unused_prefix)
continue;
}
if (!strncmp(arg, "--exclude-per-directory=", 24)) {
struct dir_struct *dir;
if (opts.dir)
die("more than one --exclude-per-directory are given.");
dir = calloc(1, sizeof(*opts.dir));
dir->show_ignored = 1;
dir->exclude_per_dir = arg + 24;
opts.dir = dir;
/* We do not need to nor want to do read-directory
* here; we are merely interested in reusing the
* per directory ignore stack mechanism.
*/
continue;
}
/* using -u and -i at the same time makes no sense */
if (1 < opts.index_only + opts.update)
usage(read_tree_usage);
......@@ -190,6 +208,8 @@ int cmd_read_tree(int argc, const char **argv, const char *unused_prefix)
}
if ((opts.update||opts.index_only) && !opts.merge)
usage(read_tree_usage);
if ((opts.dir && !opts.update))
die("--exclude-per-directory is meaningless unless -u");
if (opts.prefix) {
int pfxlen = strlen(opts.prefix);
......
......@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void add_excludes_from_file(struct dir_struct *dir, const char *fname)
die("cannot use %s as an exclude file", fname);
}
static int push_exclude_per_directory(struct dir_struct *dir, const char *base, int baselen)
int push_exclude_per_directory(struct dir_struct *dir, const char *base, int baselen)
{
char exclude_file[PATH_MAX];
struct exclude_list *el = &dir->exclude_list[EXC_DIRS];
......@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static int push_exclude_per_directory(struct dir_struct *dir, const char *base,
return current_nr;
}
static void pop_exclude_per_directory(struct dir_struct *dir, int stk)
void pop_exclude_per_directory(struct dir_struct *dir, int stk)
{
struct exclude_list *el = &dir->exclude_list[EXC_DIRS];
......
......@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ extern int common_prefix(const char **pathspec);
extern int match_pathspec(const char **pathspec, const char *name, int namelen, int prefix, char *seen);
extern int read_directory(struct dir_struct *, const char *path, const char *base, int baselen);
extern int push_exclude_per_directory(struct dir_struct *, const char *, int);
extern void pop_exclude_per_directory(struct dir_struct *, int);
extern int excluded(struct dir_struct *, const char *);
extern void add_excludes_from_file(struct dir_struct *, const char *fname);
extern void add_exclude(const char *string, const char *base,
......
......@@ -8,23 +8,27 @@ test_description='read-tree -m -u checks working tree files'
test_expect_success 'two-way setup' '
mkdir subdir &&
echo >file1 file one &&
echo >file2 file two &&
git update-index --add file1 file2 &&
echo >subdir/file1 file one in subdirectory &&
echo >subdir/file2 file two in subdirectory &&
git update-index --add file1 file2 subdir/file1 subdir/file2 &&
git commit -m initial &&
git branch side &&
git tag -f branch-point &&
echo file2 is not tracked on the master anymore &&
rm -f file2 &&
git update-index --remove file2 &&
git commit -a -m "master removes file2"
rm -f file2 subdir/file2 &&
git update-index --remove file2 subdir/file2 &&
git commit -a -m "master removes file2 and subdir/file2"
'
test_expect_success 'two-way not clobbering' '
echo >file2 master creates untracked file2 &&
echo >subdir/file2 master creates untracked subdir/file2 &&
if err=`git read-tree -m -u master side 2>&1`
then
echo should have complained
......@@ -34,20 +38,82 @@ test_expect_success 'two-way not clobbering' '
fi
'
echo file2 >.gitignore
test_expect_success 'two-way with incorrect --exclude-per-directory (1)' '
if err=`git read-tree -m --exclude-per-directory=.gitignore master side 2>&1`
then
echo should have complained
false
else
echo "happy to see $err"
fi
'
test_expect_success 'two-way with incorrect --exclude-per-directory (2)' '
if err=`git read-tree -m -u --exclude-per-directory=foo --exclude-per-directory=.gitignore master side 2>&1`
then
echo should have complained
false
else
echo "happy to see $err"
fi
'
test_expect_success 'two-way clobbering a ignored file' '
git read-tree -m -u --exclude-per-directory=.gitignore master side
'
rm -f .gitignore
# three-tree test
test_expect_success 'three-way not complaining' '
test_expect_success 'three-way not complaining on an untracked path in both' '
rm -f file2 &&
rm -f file2 subdir/file2 &&
git checkout side &&
echo >file3 file three &&
git update-index --add file3 &&
git commit -a -m "side adds file3" &&
echo >subdir/file3 file three &&
git update-index --add file3 subdir/file3 &&
git commit -a -m "side adds file3 and removes file2" &&
git checkout master &&
echo >file2 file two is untracked on the master side &&
echo >subdir/file2 file two is untracked on the master side &&
git-read-tree -m -u branch-point master side
'
test_expect_success 'three-way not cloberring a working tree file' '
git reset --hard &&
rm -f file2 subdir/file2 file3 subdir/file3 &&
git checkout master &&
echo >file3 file three created in master, untracked &&
echo >subdir/file3 file three created in master, untracked &&
if err=`git read-tree -m -u branch-point master side 2>&1`
then
echo should have complained
false
else
echo "happy to see $err"
fi
'
echo >.gitignore file3
test_expect_success 'three-way not complaining on an untracked file' '
git reset --hard &&
rm -f file2 subdir/file2 file3 subdir/file3 &&
git checkout master &&
echo >file3 file three created in master, untracked &&
echo >subdir/file3 file three created in master, untracked &&
git read-tree -m -u --exclude-per-directory=.gitignore branch-point master side
'
test_done
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include "cache.h"
#include "dir.h"
#include "tree.h"
#include "tree-walk.h"
#include "cache-tree.h"
......@@ -77,6 +78,12 @@ static int unpack_trees_rec(struct tree_entry_list **posns, int len,
{
int baselen = strlen(base);
int src_size = len + 1;
int i_stk = i_stk;
int retval = 0;
if (o->dir)
i_stk = push_exclude_per_directory(o->dir, base, strlen(base));
do {
int i;
const char *first;
......@@ -143,7 +150,7 @@ static int unpack_trees_rec(struct tree_entry_list **posns, int len,
}
/* No name means we're done */
if (!first)
return 0;
goto leave_directory;
pathlen = strlen(first);
ce_size = cache_entry_size(baselen + pathlen);
......@@ -240,13 +247,20 @@ static int unpack_trees_rec(struct tree_entry_list **posns, int len,
newbase[baselen + pathlen] = '/';
newbase[baselen + pathlen + 1] = '\0';
if (unpack_trees_rec(subposns, len, newbase, o,
indpos, df_conflict_list))
return -1;
indpos, df_conflict_list)) {
retval = -1;
goto leave_directory;
}
free(newbase);
}
free(subposns);
free(src);
} while (1);
leave_directory:
if (o->dir)
pop_exclude_per_directory(o->dir, i_stk);
return retval;
}
/* Unlink the last component and attempt to remove leading
......@@ -456,7 +470,7 @@ static void invalidate_ce_path(struct cache_entry *ce)
/*
* We do not want to remove or overwrite a working tree file that
* is not tracked.
* is not tracked, unless it is ignored.
*/
static void verify_absent(const char *path, const char *action,
struct unpack_trees_options *o)
......@@ -465,7 +479,7 @@ static void verify_absent(const char *path, const char *action,
if (o->index_only || o->reset || !o->update)
return;
if (!lstat(path, &st))
if (!lstat(path, &st) && !(o->dir && excluded(o->dir, path)))
die("Untracked working tree file '%s' "
"would be %s by merge.", path, action);
}
......
......@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct unpack_trees_options {
int verbose_update;
int aggressive;
const char *prefix;
struct dir_struct *dir;
merge_fn_t fn;
int head_idx;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册