提交 d7da5597 编写于 作者: J Junio C Hamano

Sync with GIT 1.5.3.3

Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GIT v1.5.3.3 Release Notes
==========================
Fixes since v1.5.3.2
--------------------
* git-quiltimport did not like it when a patch described in the
series file does not exist.
* p4 importer missed executable bit in some cases.
* The default shell on some FreeBSD did not execute the
argument parsing code correctly and made git unusable.
* git-svn incorrectly spawned pager even when the user user
explicitly asked not to.
* sample post-receive hook overquoted the envelope sender
value.
* git-am got confused when the patch contained a change that is
only about type and not contents.
* git-mergetool did not show our and their version of the
conflicted file when started from a subdirectory of the
project.
* git-mergetool did not pass correct options when invoking diff3.
* git-log sometimes invoked underlying "diff" machinery
unnecessarily.
--
exec >/var/tmp/1
O=v1.5.3.2-29-gb7bb760
echo O=`git describe refs/heads/maint`
git shortlog --no-merges $O..refs/heads/maint
......@@ -1459,7 +1459,8 @@ Although git is a truly distributed system, it is often
convenient to organize your project with an informal hierarchy
of developers. Linux kernel development is run this way. There
is a nice illustration (page 17, "Merges to Mainline") in
link:http://tinyurl.com/a2jdg[Randy Dunlap's presentation].
link:http://www.xenotime.net/linux/mentor/linux-mentoring-2006.pdf
[Randy Dunlap's presentation].
It should be stressed that this hierarchy is purely *informal*.
There is nothing fundamental in git that enforces the "chain of
......
......@@ -103,14 +103,20 @@ We set a tag in R1 (lastR2bundle) after the previous such transport,
and move it afterwards to help build the bundle.
in R1 on A:
------------
$ git-bundle create mybundle master ^lastR2bundle
$ git tag -f lastR2bundle master
------------
(move mybundle from A to B by some mechanism)
in R2 on B:
------------
$ git-bundle verify mybundle
$ git-fetch mybundle refspec
------------
where refspec is refInBundle:localRef
......@@ -124,9 +130,11 @@ Also, with something like this in your config:
You can first sneakernet the bundle file to ~/tmp/file.bdl and
then these commands:
------------
$ git ls-remote bundle
$ git fetch bundle
$ git pull bundle
------------
would treat it as if it is talking with a remote side over the
network.
......
......@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ merge.verbosity::
message if conflicts were detected. Level 1 outputs only
conflicts, 2 outputs conflicts and file changes. Level 5 and
above outputs debugging information. The default is level 2.
Can be overriden by 'GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY' environment variable.
Can be overridden by 'GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY' environment variable.
HOW MERGE WORKS
......
......@@ -145,17 +145,6 @@ sign `$` upon checkout. Any byte sequence that begins with
with `$Id$` upon check-in.
Interaction between checkin/checkout attributes
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
In the check-in codepath, the worktree file is first converted
with `ident` (if specified), and then with `crlf` (again, if
specified and applicable).
In the check-out codepath, the blob content is first converted
with `crlf`, and then `ident`.
`filter`
^^^^^^^^
......@@ -175,11 +164,10 @@ but makes the filter a no-op passthru.
The content filtering is done to massage the content into a
shape that is more convenient for the platform, filesystem, and
the user to use. The keyword here is "more convenient" and not
"turning something unusable into usable". In other words, it is
"hanging yourself because we gave you a long rope" if your
project uses filtering mechanism in such a way that it makes
your project unusable unless the checkout is done with a
specific filter in effect.
"turning something unusable into usable". In other words, the
intent is that if someone unsets the filter driver definition,
or does not have the appropriate filter program, the project
should still be usable.
Interaction between checkin/checkout attributes
......
......@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ precedence, the last matching pattern decides the outcome):
* Patterns read from a `.gitignore` file in the same directory
as the path, or in any parent directory, with patterns in the
higher level files (up to the root) being overriden by those in
higher level files (up to the root) being overridden by those in
lower level files down to the directory containing the file.
These patterns match relative to the location of the
`.gitignore` file. A project normally includes such
......
......@@ -2856,8 +2856,7 @@ between two related tree objects, since it can ignore any entries with
identical object names.
(Note: in the presence of submodules, trees may also have commits as
entries. See gitlink:git-submodule[1] and gitlink:gitmodules.txt[1]
for partial documentation.)
entries. See <<submodules>> for documentation.)
Note that the files all have mode 644 or 755: git actually only pays
attention to the executable bit.
......@@ -3163,12 +3162,45 @@ information as long as you have the name of the tree that it described.
Submodules
==========
This tutorial explains how to create and publish a repository with submodules
using the gitlink:git-submodule[1] command.
Submodules maintain their own identity; the submodule support just stores the
submodule repository location and commit ID, so other developers who clone the
superproject can easily clone all the submodules at the same revision.
Large projects are often composed of smaller, self-contained modules. For
example, an embedded Linux distribution's source tree would include every
piece of software in the distribution with some local modifications; a movie
player might need to build against a specific, known-working version of a
decompression library; several independent programs might all share the same
build scripts.
With centralized revision control systems this is often accomplished by
including every module in one single repository. Developers can check out
all modules or only the modules they need to work with. They can even modify
files across several modules in a single commit while moving things around
or updating APIs and translations.
Git does not allow partial checkouts, so duplicating this approach in Git
would force developers to keep a local copy of modules they are not
interested in touching. Commits in an enormous checkout would be slower
than you'd expect as Git would have to scan every directory for changes.
If modules have a lot of local history, clones would take forever.
On the plus side, distributed revision control systems can much better
integrate with external sources. In a centralized model, a single arbitrary
snapshot of the external project is exported from its own revision control
and then imported into the local revision control on a vendor branch. All
the history is hidden. With distributed revision control you can clone the
entire external history and much more easily follow development and re-merge
local changes.
Git's submodule support allows a repository to contain, as a subdirectory, a
checkout of an external project. Submodules maintain their own identity;
the submodule support just stores the submodule repository location and
commit ID, so other developers who clone the containing project
("superproject") can easily clone all the submodules at the same revision.
Partial checkouts of the superproject are possible: you can tell Git to
clone none, some or all of the submodules.
The gitlink:git-submodule[1] command is available since Git 1.5.3. Users
with Git 1.5.2 can look up the submodule commits in the repository and
manually check them out; earlier versions won't recognize the submodules at
all.
To see how submodule support works, create (for example) four example
repositories that can be used later as a submodule:
......@@ -3213,8 +3245,8 @@ The `git submodule add` command does a couple of things:
- It clones the submodule under the current directory and by default checks out
the master branch.
- It adds the submodule's clone path to the `.gitmodules` file and adds this
file to the index, ready to be committed.
- It adds the submodule's clone path to the gitlink:gitmodules[5] file and
adds this file to the index, ready to be committed.
- It adds the submodule's current commit ID to the index, ready to be
committed.
......@@ -4277,5 +4309,3 @@ Write a chapter on using plumbing and writing scripts.
Alternates, clone -reference, etc.
git unpack-objects -r for recovery
submodules
......@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ USAGE='[--tool=tool] [file to merge] ...'
SUBDIRECTORY_OK=Yes
. git-sh-setup
require_work_tree
prefix=$(git rev-parse --show-prefix)
# Returns true if the mode reflects a symlink
is_symlink () {
......@@ -162,9 +163,9 @@ merge_file () {
local_mode=`git ls-files -u -- "$path" | awk '{if ($3==2) print $1;}'`
remote_mode=`git ls-files -u -- "$path" | awk '{if ($3==3) print $1;}'`
base_present && git cat-file blob ":1:$path" > "$BASE" 2>/dev/null
local_present && git cat-file blob ":2:$path" > "$LOCAL" 2>/dev/null
remote_present && git cat-file blob ":3:$path" > "$REMOTE" 2>/dev/null
base_present && git cat-file blob ":1:$prefix$path" >"$BASE" 2>/dev/null
local_present && git cat-file blob ":2:$prefix$path" >"$LOCAL" 2>/dev/null
remote_present && git cat-file blob ":3:$prefix$path" >"$REMOTE" 2>/dev/null
if test -z "$local_mode" -o -z "$remote_mode"; then
echo "Deleted merge conflict for '$path':"
......@@ -191,10 +192,10 @@ merge_file () {
case "$merge_tool" in
kdiff3)
if base_present ; then
(kdiff3 --auto --L1 "$path (Base)" -L2 "$path (Local)" --L3 "$path (Remote)" \
(kdiff3 --auto --L1 "$path (Base)" --L2 "$path (Local)" --L3 "$path (Remote)" \
-o "$path" -- "$BASE" "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE" > /dev/null 2>&1)
else
(kdiff3 --auto -L1 "$path (Local)" --L2 "$path (Remote)" \
(kdiff3 --auto --L1 "$path (Local)" --L2 "$path (Remote)" \
-o "$path" -- "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE" > /dev/null 2>&1)
fi
status=$?
......@@ -251,9 +252,9 @@ merge_file () {
;;
emerge)
if base_present ; then
emacs -f emerge-files-with-ancestor-command "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE" "$BASE" "$path"
emacs -f emerge-files-with-ancestor-command "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE" "$BASE" "$(basename "$path")"
else
emacs -f emerge-files-command "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE" "$path"
emacs -f emerge-files-command "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE" "$(basename "$path")"
fi
status=$?
save_backup
......
......@@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ commit=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
mkdir $tmp_dir || exit 2
for patch_name in $(grep -v '^#' < "$QUILT_PATCHES/series" ); do
if ! [ -f "$QUILT_PATCHES/$patch_name" ] ; then
echo "$patch_name doesn't exist. Skipping."
continue
fi
echo $patch_name
git mailinfo "$tmp_msg" "$tmp_patch" \
<"$QUILT_PATCHES/$patch_name" >"$tmp_info" || exit 3
......
......@@ -1209,8 +1209,6 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char **argv, struct rev_info *revs, const ch
opts = diff_opt_parse(&revs->diffopt, argv+i, argc-i);
if (opts > 0) {
if (strcmp(argv[i], "-z"))
revs->diff = 1;
i += opts - 1;
continue;
}
......@@ -1254,6 +1252,14 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char **argv, struct rev_info *revs, const ch
add_pending_object_with_mode(revs, object, def, mode);
}
/* Did the user ask for any diff output? Run the diff! */
if (revs->diffopt.output_format & ~DIFF_FORMAT_NO_OUTPUT)
revs->diff = 1;
/* Pickaxe needs diffs */
if (revs->diffopt.pickaxe)
revs->diff = 1;
if (revs->topo_order)
revs->limited = 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册