提交 cc06c870 编写于 作者: J Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'jc/send-pack-pipeline'

* jc/send-pack-pipeline:
  Documentation: illustrate send-pack pipeline.
  send-pack: fix pipeline.
git-send-pack
=============
Overall operation
-----------------
. Connects to the remote side and invokes git-receive-pack.
. Learns what refs the remote has and what commit they point at.
Matches them to the refspecs we are pushing.
. Checks if there are non-fast-forwards. Unlike fetch-pack,
the repository send-pack runs in is supposed to be a superset
of the recipient in fast-forward cases, so there is no need
for want/have exchanges, and fast-forward check can be done
locally. Tell the result to the other end.
. Calls pack_objects() which generates a packfile and sends it
over to the other end.
. If the remote side is new enough (v1.1.0 or later), wait for
the unpack and hook status from the other end.
. Exit with appropriate error codes.
Pack_objects pipeline
---------------------
This function gets one file descriptor (`out`) which is either a
socket (over the network) or a pipe (local). What's written to
this fd goes to git-receive-pack to be unpacked.
send-pack ---> fd ---> receive-pack
It somehow forks once, but does not wait for it. I am not sure
why.
The forked child calls rev_list_generate() with that file
descriptor (while the parent closes `out` -- the child will be
the one that writes the packfile to the other end).
send-pack
|
rev-list-generate ---> fd ---> receive-pack
Then rev-list-generate forks after creates a pipe; the child
will become a pipeline "rev-list --stdin | pack-objects", which
is the rev_list() function, while the parent feeds that pipeline
the list of refs.
send-pack
|
rev-list-generate ---> fd ---> receive-pack
| ^ (pipe)
v |
rev-list
The child process, before calling rev-list, rearranges the file
descriptors:
. what it reads from rev-list-generate via pipe becomes the
stdin; this is to feed the upstream of the pipeline which will
be git-rev-list process.
. what it writes to its stdout goes to the fd connected to
receive-pack.
On the other hand, the parent process, before starting to feed
the child pipeline, closes the reading side of the pipe and fd
to receive-pack.
send-pack
|
rev-list-generate
|
v [0]
rev-list [1] ---> receive-pack
The parent then writes to the pipe and later closes it. There
is a commented out waitpid to wait for the rev-list side before
it exits, I again do not understand why.
The rev-list function further sets up a pipe and forks to run
git-rev-list piped to git-pack-objects. The child side, before
exec'ing git-pack-objects, rearranges the file descriptors:
. what it reads from the pipe becomes the stdin; this gets the
list of objects from the git-rev-list process.
. its stdout is already connected to receive-pack, so what it
generates goes there.
The parent process arranges its file descriptors before exec'ing
git-rev-list:
. its stdout is sent to the pipe to feed git-pack-objects.
. its stdin is already connected to rev-list-generate and will
read the set of refs from it.
send-pack
|
rev-list-generate
|
v [0]
git-rev-list [1] ---> [0] git-pack-objects [1] ---> receive-pack
......@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void exec_rev_list(struct ref *refs)
/*
* Run "rev-list --stdin | pack-objects" pipe.
*/
static void rev_list(int fd, struct ref *refs)
static void rev_list(struct ref *refs)
{
int pipe_fd[2];
pid_t pack_objects_pid;
......@@ -71,10 +71,8 @@ static void rev_list(int fd, struct ref *refs)
* and writes to the original fd
*/
dup2(pipe_fd[0], 0);
dup2(fd, 1);
close(pipe_fd[0]);
close(pipe_fd[1]);
close(fd);
exec_pack_objects();
die("pack-objects setup failed");
}
......@@ -85,7 +83,6 @@ static void rev_list(int fd, struct ref *refs)
dup2(pipe_fd[1], 1);
close(pipe_fd[0]);
close(pipe_fd[1]);
close(fd);
exec_rev_list(refs);
}
......@@ -111,7 +108,7 @@ static void rev_list_generate(int fd, struct ref *refs)
close(pipe_fd[0]);
close(pipe_fd[1]);
close(fd);
rev_list(fd, refs);
rev_list(refs);
die("rev-list setup failed");
}
if (rev_list_generate_pid < 0)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册