提交 c50230f7 编写于 作者: J Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'tr/maint-merge-ours-clarification' (early part)

* 'tr/maint-merge-ours-clarification' (early part):
  rebase docs: clarify --merge and --strategy
  Documentation: clarify 'ours' merge strategy
......@@ -228,13 +228,23 @@ OPTIONS
Use merging strategies to rebase. When the recursive (default) merge
strategy is used, this allows rebase to be aware of renames on the
upstream side.
+
Note that a rebase merge works by replaying each commit from the working
branch on top of the <upstream> branch. Because of this, when a merge
conflict happens, the side reported as 'ours' is the so-far rebased
series, starting with <upstream>, and 'theirs' is the working branch. In
other words, the sides are swapped.
-s <strategy>::
--strategy=<strategy>::
Use the given merge strategy.
If there is no `-s` option, a built-in list of strategies
is used instead ('git-merge-recursive' when merging a single
head, 'git-merge-octopus' otherwise). This implies --merge.
If there is no `-s` option 'git-merge-recursive' is used
instead. This implies --merge.
+
Because 'git-rebase' replays each commit from the working branch
on top of the <upstream> branch using the given strategy, using
the 'ours' strategy simply discards all patches from the <branch>,
which makes little sense.
-q::
--quiet::
......
......@@ -29,8 +29,9 @@ octopus::
pulling or merging more than one branch.
ours::
This resolves any number of heads, but the result of the
merge is always the current branch head. It is meant to
This resolves any number of heads, but the resulting tree of the
merge is always that of the current branch head, effectively
ignoring all changes from all other branches. It is meant to
be used to supersede old development history of side
branches.
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册