提交 81eaa065 编写于 作者: J Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'jk/doc-fsck' into maint

* jk/doc-fsck:
  docs: brush up obsolete bits of git-fsck manpage
......@@ -72,30 +72,20 @@ index file, all SHA1 references in .git/refs/*, and all reflogs (unless
a blob, the contents are written into the file, rather than
its object name.
It tests SHA1 and general object sanity, and it does full tracking of
the resulting reachability and everything else. It prints out any
corruption it finds (missing or bad objects), and if you use the
'--unreachable' flag it will also print out objects that exist but
that aren't reachable from any of the specified head nodes.
So for example
git fsck --unreachable HEAD \
$(git for-each-ref --format="%(objectname)" refs/heads)
DISCUSSION
----------
will do quite a _lot_ of verification on the tree. There are a few
extra validity tests to be added (make sure that tree objects are
sorted properly etc), but on the whole if 'git fsck' is happy, you
do have a valid tree.
git-fsck tests SHA1 and general object sanity, and it does full tracking
of the resulting reachability and everything else. It prints out any
corruption it finds (missing or bad objects), and if you use the
'--unreachable' flag it will also print out objects that exist but that
aren't reachable from any of the specified head nodes (or the default
set, as mentioned above).
Any corrupt objects you will have to find in backups or other archives
(i.e., you can just remove them and do an 'rsync' with some other site in
the hopes that somebody else has the object you have corrupted).
Of course, "valid tree" doesn't mean that it wasn't generated by some
evil person, and the end result might be crap. git is a revision
tracking system, not a quality assurance system ;)
Extracted Diagnostics
---------------------
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册